WASHINGTON, DC --The Rutherford Institute, in conjunction with the Cato Institute and the Goldwater Institute's Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation, has filed a friend of the court brief with the United States Supreme Court in Safford Unif. Sch. Dist. # 1 v. Redding.
The Institute's brief asks the Court to affirm that school officials violated the constitutional rights of a 13-year-old Arizona girl when they subjected her to an intimate strip search based on a classmate's uncorroborated accusation that she possessed ibuprofen.
"Subjecting students throughout the country to invasive strip searches in the so-called quest to make the schools safer and drug-free is ludicrous," said John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute. "Savana's case illustrates the danger inherent in giving school administrators carte blanche authority to violate the civil liberties and privacy rights of students."
In October 2003, Savana Redding, an eighth-grade honor roll student at Safford Middle School in Safford, Arizona, was accused of possessing prescription-strength ibuprofen. Although Savana, who had no disciplinary record, denied the charge and a search of her belongings and outer clothing disclosed no evidence of wrongdoing, school officials subjected her to what a federal appeals judge described as a humiliating and degrading strip search.
After stripping down to her underwear, Savana was ordered to pull out her bra and move it from side to side and open her legs and pull out her underwear so that her breasts and genital area could be examined by two female school employees. No pills were found. Savana did not return to school for months after the search and eventually transferred to another school.
In response to a lawsuit filed by Savana's mother, a district court ruled that the strip search did not violated Savana's Fourth Amendment rights. However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court's ruling, stating, "It does not require a constitutional scholar to conclude that a nude search of a 13-year-old child is an invasion of constitutional rights. More than that, it is a violation of any known principle of human dignity." School officials subsequently appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which agreed to hear arguments in the case on April 21.
Pointing out that strip searches are the most severe invasions of privacy that the government can legally commit, Rutherford Institute attorneys argue in their brief that school officials must have particularly strong and targeted evidence to support the decision to require a student to disrobe and expose his or her private areas. In addition to asking the Supreme Court to affirm the Ninth Circuit's ruling, Institute attorneys also urged the justices to provide school officials with guidance that will protect the security of students from severe intrusions into their personal privacy.
Join the lawsuit that will expose the true roots of terrorism at the Bohemian Grove. We are seeking a multi-million dollar settlement from those mind programmers who deceived us about 9/11 and the "war on terror."
Consumer advocate: 'I have never seen a credit card practice this abusive.' Usury is the Mind Control weapon of choice by top U.S. companies.
Until recently, Brian Woods of Akron, Ohio was a happy Chase Bank customer. Several years ago he accepted a promotional offer to use the bank’s “Lower than Prime” balance transfer checks to move high interest debt to his Chase credit card. The Chase solicitation promised: “No tricks. No gimmicks. Just savings.”
The offer was straightforward. Woods would pay a 3 percent transfer fee and get an amazingly low interest rate of 3.99 percent APR “until the balance is paid off.” Woods says he paid “on time, every time” in order to keep that interest rate.
Woods became an angry Chase customer when he received his January statement and saw a $10 “monthly service charge” had been added. The bank also bumped up his monthly minimum from 2 percent to 5 percent sending his payment from $140 to $300.
“I’ve seen banks do screwy things before, but this was the most blatant breach of contract I’ve seen a bank do,” he says.
Woods called Chase customer service and was told the bank would drop the monthly fee and return the minimum payment to 2 percent if he agreed to a new interest rate of 7.99 percent for a year. After that, he was told, the rate could go even higher.
“I said no, that’s blackmail, I’m not doing it,” Woods tells me. He got off the phone and contacted a lawyer.
This was not an isolated case. Last November, Chase notified about 400,000 people with these low interest cards their minimum monthly payment would more than double and a $10 monthly service fee would be added.
“I have never seen a credit card practice this abusive,” says Joe Ridout with Consumer Action, the San Francisco-based advocacy group. “The people who accepted this offer were those who really read the fine print. They understood the fine print. Then Chase went and erased the fine print and wrote some new fine print that was very advantageous to the bank and lets them gouge their cardholders.”
Class-action lawsuit filed
Earlier this year, Woods and another unhappy customer filed a class-action lawsuit against Chase. The suit claims Chase engages in “unlawful, unfair, and fraudulent business acts and practices.” It also alleges the bank violated the federal Truth-in-Lending Act.
What do I need to do?
If you are one of the Chase customers who had this happen to you, you don’t need to do anything right now. If the lawsuit is certified as a class action suit and there is a settlement, you will be notified by mail. The New York firm of Giskan, Solotaroff, Anderson and Stewart is handling this case.
The suit blasts Chase for “taking advantage of its customers, many of who are suffering extreme economic hardship by essentially ‘welching’ on its promise …”
All credit card issuers, including Chase, have provisions in their member agreements giving them the right to change the terms at anytime for any reason. The lawsuit argues this language does not allow Chase to change “the main terms” of the contract – a fixed rate for the life of the loan as long as you are a customer in good standing.
Attorney Jason Solotaroff who’s working on the class action lawsuit says his clients, Chase customers, were never told a fee could be added.
Why did Chase do this? Chase will not comment on a pending lawsuit, but the company e-mailed me a statement. “Tens of millions of Chase customers have taken advantage of our promotional low rate financing over the last five years,” writes Stephanie Jackson, first vice president for public affairs.
Goldman Sachs is attempting to shut down a dissident blogger who is extremely critical of the investment bank, its board members and its practices.
By James Quinn, Wall Street Correspondent Last Updated: 2:16PM BST 11 Apr 2009
The New York headquarters of Goldman Sachs, which has instructed a Wall Street law firm to tell a blogger to stop criticising the bank Photo: Getty Images The bank has instructed Wall Street law firm Chadbourne & Parke to pursue blogger Mike Morgan, warning him in a recent cease-and-desist letter that he may face legal action if he does not close down his website. Maybe the first amendment is actually working as the Founding Fathers had planned? A real citizen speaking freely against a monster corporation?
Florida-based Mr Morgan began a blog entitled "Facts about Goldman Sachs" – the web address for which is goldmansachs666.com – just a few weeks ago.
Wall Street backs Barack Obama's toxic assets planIn that time Mr Morgan, a registered investment adviser, has added a number of posts to the site, including one entitled "Does Goldman Sachs run the world?". However, many of the posts relate to other Wall Street firms and issues.
According to Chadbourne & Parke's letter, dated April 8, the bank is rattled because the site "violates several of Goldman Sachs' intellectual property rights" and also "implies a relationship" with the bank itself.
Unsurprisingly for a man who has conjoined the bank's name with the Number of the Beast – although he jokingly points out that 666 was also the S&P500's bear-market bottom – Mr Morgan is unlikely to go down without a fight.
He claims he has followed all legal requirements to own and operate the website – and that the header of the site clearly states that the content has not been approved by the bank.
On a special section of his blog entitled "Goldman Sachs vs Mike Morgan" he predicts that the fight will probably end up in court.
"It's just another example of how a bully like Goldman Sachs tries to throw their weight around," he writes.
Speaking to The Daily Telegraph, Mr Morgan explained how he went through a similar battle with US homebuilder Lennar a few years ago after he set up a website to collect information on what he alleged was shoddy workmanship in its homes. The pair eventually settled out of court.
"Since I went through this with Lennar, I've had advice from some of the best intellectual property lawyers, and I know exactly what I can and can't do. We're not going to back down from this," he promises.
Mr Morgan adds that if Goldman manages to shut down his site, he has a number of other domain names registered.
• Speculation is mounting that Goldman Sachs is set to raise several billion dollars via a share sale, possibly next week, in order to pay down a $10bn (£6.8bn) US government loan, as revealed in The Sunday Telegraph last week.
Who imagined that in 2009, the world’s governments would be declaring a new War on Pirates? Is this yet another programmed bogey-man to usher in more "endless war"? As you read this, the British Royal Navy - backed by the ships of more than two dozen nations, from the U.S. to China - is sailing into Somalian waters to take on men we still picture as parrot-on-the-shoulder pantomime villains. They will soon be fighting Somalian ships and even chasing the pirates onto land, into one of the most broken countries on earth.
In the “golden age of piracy” — from 1650 to 1730 — the idea of the pirate as the senseless, savage thief that lingers today was created by the British government in a great propaganda heave.
But behind the arrr-me-hearties oddness of this tale, there is an untold scandal. The people our governments are labeling as “one of the great menaces of our times” have an extraordinary story to tell - and some justice on their side.
Pirates have never been quite who we think they are. In the “golden age of piracy” - from 1650 to 1730 - the idea of the pirate as the senseless, savage thief that lingers today was created by the British government in a great propaganda heave. Many ordinary people believed it was false: Pirates were often rescued from the gallows by supportive crowds. Why? What did they see that we can’t?
In his book “Villains of All Nations,” the historian Marcus Rediker pores through the evidence to find out. If you became a merchant or navy sailor then - plucked from the docks of London’s East End, young and hungry - you ended up in a floating wooden Hell. You worked all hours on a cramped, half-starved ship, and if you slacked off for a second, the all-powerful captain would whip you with the cat o’ nine tails. If you slacked consistently, you could be thrown overboard. And at the end of months or years of this, you were often cheated of your wages.
Pirates were the first people to rebel against this world. They mutinied against their tyrannical captains - and created a different way of working on the seas. Once they had a ship, the pirates elected their captains, and made all their decisions collectively. They shared their bounty out in what Rediker calls “one of the most egalitarian plans for the disposition of resources to be found anywhere in the 18th century.”
They even took in escaped African slaves and lived with them as equals. The pirates showed “quite clearly - and subversively - that ships did not have to be run in the brutal and oppressive ways of the merchant service and the Royal navy.” This is why they were popular, despite being unproductive thieves.
The words of one pirate from that lost age - a young British man called William Scott - should echo into this new age of piracy. Just before he was hanged in Charleston, South Carolina, he said: “What I did was to keep me from perishing. I was forced to go a-pirating to live.”
In 1991, the government of Somalia - in the Horn of Africa - collapsed. Its 9 million people have been teetering on starvation ever since - and many of the ugliest forces in the Western world have seen this as a great opportunity to steal the country’s food supply and dump our nuclear waste in their seas.
In a surreal telephone interview, one of the pirate leaders, Sugule Ali, said their motive was “to stop illegal fishing and dumping in our waters … We don’t consider ourselves sea bandits. We consider sea bandits [to be] those who illegally fish and dump in our seas and dump waste in our seas and carry weapons in our seas.”
Yes: nuclear waste. As soon as the government was gone, mysterious European ships started appearing off the coast of Somalia, dumping vast barrels into the ocean. The coastal population began to sicken. At first they suffered strange rashes, nausea and malformed babies. Then, after the 2005 tsunami, hundreds of the dumped and leaking barrels washed up on shore. People began to suffer from radiation sickness, and more than 300 died.
Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah, the U.N. envoy to Somalia, tells me: “Somebody is dumping nuclear material here. There is also lead and heavy metals such as cadmium and mercury - you name it.” Much of it can be traced back to European hospitals and factories, who seem to be passing it on to the Italian mafia to “dispose” of cheaply. When I asked Ould-Abdallah what European governments were doing about it, he said with a sigh: “Nothing. There has been no cleanup, no compensation and no prevention.”
At the same time, other European ships have been looting Somalia’s seas of their greatest resource: seafood. We have destroyed our own fish stocks by over-exploitation - and now we have moved on to theirs. More than $300 million worth of tuna, shrimp, lobster and other sea life is being stolen every year by vast trawlers illegally sailing into Somalia’s unprotected seas.
The local fishermen have suddenly lost their livelihoods, and they are starving. Mohammed Hussein, a fisherman in the town of Marka 100km south of Mogadishu, told Reuters: “If nothing is done, there soon won’t be much fish left in our coastal waters.”
This is the context in which the men we are calling “pirates” have emerged. Everyone agrees they were ordinary Somalian fishermen who at first took speedboats to try to dissuade the dumpers and trawlers, or at least wage a “tax” on them. They call themselves the Volunteer Coast Guard of Somalia - and it’s not hard to see why.
In a surreal telephone interview, one of the pirate leaders, Sugule Ali, said their motive was “to stop illegal fishing and dumping in our waters … We don’t consider ourselves sea bandits. We consider sea bandits [to be] those who illegally fish and dump in our seas and dump waste in our seas and carry weapons in our seas.” William Scott would understand those words.
No, this doesn’t make hostage-taking justifiable, and yes, some are clearly just gangsters - especially those who have held up World Food Program supplies. But the “pirates” have the overwhelming support of the local population for a reason. The independent Somalian news site WardherNews conducted the best research we have into what ordinary Somalis are thinking - and it found 70 percent “strongly supported the piracy as a form of national defense of the country’s territorial waters.”
During the revolutionary war in America, George Washington and America’s founding fathers paid pirates to protect America’s territorial waters, because they had no navy or coast guard of their own. Most Americans supported them. Is this so different?
Did we expect starving Somalians to stand passively on their beaches, paddling in our nuclear waste, and watch us snatch their fish to eat in restaurants in London and Paris and Rome? We didn’t act on those crimes - but when some of the fishermen responded by disrupting the transit corridor for 20 percent of the world’s oil supply, we begin to shriek about “evil.” If we really want to deal with piracy, we need to stop its root cause - our crimes - before we send in the gunboats to root out Somalia’s criminals.
The story of the 2009 war on piracy was best summarized by another pirate, who lived and died in the fourth century BC. He was captured and brought to Alexander the Great, who demanded to know “what he meant by keeping possession of the sea.” The pirate smiled and responded: “What you mean by seizing the whole earth; but because I do it with a petty ship, I am called a robber, while you, who do it with a great fleet, are called emperor.”
Once again, our great imperial fleets sail in today - but who is the robber?
Postscript: Some commentators seem bemused by the fact that both toxic dumping and the theft of fish are happening in the same place - wouldn’t this make the fish contaminated? In fact, Somalia’s coastline is vast, stretching 3,300km (over 2,000 miles). Imagine how easy it would be - without any coast guard or army - to steal fish from Florida and dump nuclear waste on California, and you get the idea. These events are happening in different places but with the same horrible effect: death for the locals and stirred-up piracy. There’s no contradiction.
The Pirate Hoax
By Michael Feldstein | December 20, 2008
A friend asked me what I think about the story in the Chronicle about the professor who encouraged his students to create a hoax story about a pirate in order to teach them about students about vetting the quality of their sources as part of a history class. They created a blog about the fake history and added a Wikipedia page about the fictional pirate. Then they “Facebooked, Twittered, and Shoutwired it.” The professor pulled the plug when he found out that some of his historian colleagues were buying into the hoax.
So what do I think of it? I think it stinks.
My issue is not with the hoax part. In fact, I think it was a clever way to teach students some important lessons in an engaging and hands-on way. Nor do I feel bad for the professor’s colleagues who were fooled. Any professional historian who buys into some bogus information on the web should probably be taking that class rather than teaching somewhere. I also think the Chronicle’s headline, “Teaching by Lying,” is cheap. I had absolutely no problem with anything this professor did—until he told his students to write the fake Wikipedia page.
Think of it this way. Suppose there was a community garden in town. A botany professor wanted to teach his students about the dangers of shoddy pest control. So he encouraged his students to plant a crop in the community garden and deliberately infect it with aphids. Sure enough, the other plots in the garden became infected too. Would that be OK?
Because that’s what this guy did. A lot of people put huge amounts of time and effort into creating the public resource that is Wikipedia. By deliberately planting a hoax article—and inviting the Chronicle to write about how he and his students got away with it—he deliberately infected the entire garden with a credibility bug. Everybody already knows that gardens are susceptible to diseases and need constant vigilence, so it’s not like he was performing some enormous public service by proving it. No, what he did was malicious and showed a careless disregard for the effort that Wikipedians put in. Worse, he taught that disregard to his students.
If he wanted to have his students create a hoax using their own blog, that’s fine. Caveat emptor. But teaching students vandalism is not what I call responsible education. How can you teach students academic integrity while teaching them to disrespect the integrity of others?
Next time he wants to teach about the quality of information on the web, I have a different suggestion: He should have his students volunteer as Wikipedia editors, checking new articles for proper sourcing. In fact, maybe he should do some of that himself as an act of community service in pennance for his vandalism.
Just a reminder to our readers that David Ray Griffin's upcoming tour begins in Wayne, Pennsylvania. Here, again, is information on the tour dates; Full US schedule is below, with details in the now-updated article we posted last week. And details of the European leg of his tour continue to be updated at timeforasecondlook.com. Perhaps you'll consider whether you might forward this information to anyone you know in or near these cities so they can attend the events. Thank you.
Professor David Ray Griffin, renowned author of a series of eye-opening books that recount his painstaking research into the attacks of September 11, 2001, begins his new European tour in London on 14th April. Stressing the fact that the time has come for a second look at the events of that fateful day, the tour will include stops in Paris, Brussels and Madrid, and several other cities.
Professor Griffin's talks will afford the public an excellent opportunity to learn more about the fundamental questions surrounding 9/11. The 9/11 Truth Movement, which started out as a disparate, grass-roots undertaking, has blossomed into a serious community that now includes many specialized branches, such as Pilots for 9/11 Truth, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth, Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth, Religious Leaders for 9/11 Truth, Veterans for 9/11 Truth, and Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice (a group which includes a significant number of prominent scientists). Many former intelligence officers also support the movement and have contributed to the ever-growing list of evidence that proves far beyond a reasonable doubt that the explanations provided by the Bush-Cheney administration are quite simply false.
Details at Time for a Second Look - European Tour
April 7 - Wayne, Pennsylvania April 14 - London May 7 - Lucerne April 8 - Poughkeepsie, NY (Vassar) April 15 - Brussels May 9 - Hamburg April 9 - Portsmouth, New Hampshire April 17 - Paris May 11 - Stockholm April 10 - Keene, New Hampshire April 18 - Lausanne May 13 - Trondheim April 11 - Boston, Massachusetts April 20 - Madrid May 14 - Oslo
Press Release: Sherwood Ross Scoop World Independent News
Torture has received the most attention among the many war crimes of the Bush administration. But those who support Bush's pursuit of the "war on terror" have not been impressed by recriminations over torture. Worse than torture are the murders of at least 50 prisoners in Abu Ghraib, Afghanistan, and Guantánamo, but again the hard-hearted are unimpressed when those whom they perceive as terrorists receive illegal extrajudicial capital punishment.
The case for abusing children, however, is more difficult to support. The best kept secret of the Bush's war crimes is that thousands of children have been imprisoned, tortured, and otherwise denied rights under the Geneva Conventions and related international agreements. Yet both Congress and the media have strangely failed to identify the very existence of child prisoners as a war crime. In the Islamic world, however, there is no such silence. Indeed, the prophet Mohammed was the first to counsel warriors not to harm innocent children.
From jailing children together with adults in prisons where they were raped to failing to notify their parents of their arrest, the U.S. committed numerous war crimes against children in Afghanistan and Iraq, a new book on President Bush states.
"American guards videotaped Iraqi male prisoners raping young boys but took no action to stop the offenses (and) children in Abu Ghraib were deliberately frightened by dogs," writes political scientist Michael Haas in his new book, George W. Bush, War Criminal? (Praeger - see below for ordering information), a question he answers in the affirmative.
"In most cases, weeks or even years elapsed before parents were informed of the imprisonment of their children," says Haas, noting that in Afghanistan alone during 2002 "at least 800 boys, aged 10 to 15 were captured", 64 of whom were sent to Guantanamo, Cuba, where some were flung into solitary confinement. Haas notes that Protocol 1 of the 1977 Geneva Convention states "No Party to the conflict shall arrange for the evacuation of children, other than its own nationals, to a foreign country" unless written consent of the parents is obtained.
In a wide-ranging 389-page volume that documents 269 different classes of war crimes perpetrated by the Bush administration, some of them repeated hundreds or thousands of times, Haas systematically exposes the former president's reckless disregard for child welfare.
To begin with, Bush's legal advisors disputed the very definition of "child" as a person under 18 years of age who needs special protection. That's the definition spelled out in the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The U.S. defined "child" as someone age 16 or younger. The U.S. last year told the UN's Committee on the Rights of the Child(CRC) since 2002 it had detained 2,400 children in Iraq and 100 in Afghanistan although other sources state the latter figure was 800. (Irrespective of the number, it is a war crime to detain any person indefinitely, which was the case here.) Also, as of May, 2008, there were 21 children incarcerated in Guantanamo. The CRC has "upbraided the United States for charging minors with war crimes instead of treating underage persons as victims of war," Haas writes.
Contrary to the CRC's Article 9, which states that a captured child shall be allowed to "maintain personal relations and direct contact with both parents on a regular basis," some children were not allowed to write or telephone home for as long as five years.
And where CRC's Article 13 guarantees "The child shall have the right to freedom to ... seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print," Haas points out "Most children were held incommunicado at Guantanamo until April, 2003" and that one child, Mohammed Jawad "remains in solitary confinement." Jawad received promises of books to study that have not been kept, Haas adds.
Other violations of international covenants pertaining to children include:
The failure to stop mistreatment of children, The failure to investigate the abuse of children. The failure to prosecute prison personnel allegedly guilty of such abuse. The failure to allow parents to visit children. The failure to allow children to have legal counsel. The failure to provide children with speedy trials. The failure to promptly inform children of the crimes against them. The failure to allow witnesses to testify in behalf of children. The failure to provide children with social programs. And although CRC Article 31 requires that children have the right "to engage in play and recreational activities appropriate to the age of the child," Haas writes, "There is no record of recreation for the hundreds of children detained at Bagram or at Abu Ghraib."
The CRC's Article 37 requires that "No child shall be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment" yet at Abu Ghraib a girl of about 12 was stripped naked and beaten, according to Iraqi journalist Suhaib Badr-Addin al-Baz, who heard her screams. He also witnessed a 15-year-old boy forced to run up and down the prison carrying two heavy cans of water who was beaten whenever he stopped. On yet another occasion, authorities arrested the 16-year-old son of Iraqi General Hamid Zabar and tortured him before presenting him to his father, whom they wanted to confess. These and several hundred other war crimes are detailed in the new book.
Professor Haas is the author or editor of 33 books on government and world politics. He has taught at a number of outstanding schools, including the University of London and Northwestern University. To receive his book, send check in the amount of $32 to Haas at P.O. Box 46127, Los Angeles, CA 90046. Haas may be reached at mikehaas [at] aol.com.
(Further information and to arrange for interviews with Professor Haas, contact Sherwood Ross at sherwoodr1 [at] yahoo.com)
Most Americans are unaware of the greatest threat to children is Alpha-level brainwashing. Covert brainwashing activities have been ongoing in the U.S. since World War II originating from a Bohemian Grove secret program. Much of the programming is fully "normalized" throughout the culture as "news" and "entertainment," yet the deep programming function of building groupthink conformity provides the Pentagon with broad statistical results in the Nazification of children and adults alike. Over 600 Nazi Mind Control agents were brought to the U.S. to build this Nazification process into American mass media. Today, Nazified politicians and bureaucrats are actively removing children from the most enlightened parents, those parents who understand how Nazi Mind Control works. Clearly, our culture has transformed dramatically since 1950 due primarily to Alpha-level media programming.
Sexual repression at childhood away from parental authority and empowerment is a long-standing Nazi scheme to manipulate and control entire populations with wrongful government manipulation and programming. Hitler's first mission in Germany was to destroy the parental duty of sex education, the most important duty of parenthood. The destruction of the parental duty is key to brainwashing throughout history. The parental duty has protected children from the slave-makers for thousands of years, but today's slave-makers employ highly advanced mesmerist arts like television, music, film and video games. Once the parental duty is lost in a given population, that population turns into slaves easily manipulated by Rockefeller's vast media mind machine. This slavery is so obvious and so easy to prove, that only a retarded coward cannot see the import of this issue. Literally, these devices of superstition and sex magic cannot work in real courts of law, so they have placed our children in Nazi courts! They are now burning effigies of children in celebration of this imposed slavery.
Death cults do not create CAPTA to "protect" children. They are stealing children for child sacrifice rituals, all of which is normalized by a controlled media. Psychological engineering is used to spread broad disinformation, myths and Nazify bureaucrats with emotional programming to destroy sound child development and Nazify children en mass. The Nazification of these children is obvious to anyone who would look.
Hundreds of faulty programming errors occurred on 9/11 proving a massive government conspiracy regarding your Rockefeller-CIA media. This is a media that is conditioning you as a slave and is blind to the real atrocities going on in America. This is a controlled blindness using your own programmed belief system against you:
Pennsylvania is the worst violator of parent and child rights as it has by far the highest number of child-trafficking organizations. Children are violated by cyborgs, programmed by the "bahavioral sciences" of the elite and not by the Constitution. They now operate Inquisitions employing powerful Nazi Mind Control trauma-based brainwashing methods against women and children, fully inverting their entire belief system for the utter destruction of their families. German children are the most prized by the elite, and Pennsylvania's high German population is the most exploited population for the making of the child mind-slave. We are identifying hundreds of child mind-slaves terrorized, raped and destroyed by these "altruistic" programs coming down from the Bohemian Grove death cult.
Our Constitution was written as a bottom-up contract where the parent retains the real power. The Nazi elite cannot function in such a power system so they will advance Mind Control to reverse our Constitution's power system in order to fully exploit non-elite children. Massive covert programming of top-down power systems have targetted American children since the 1950s, much of it stemming from a top-secret Bohemian Grove Mind Control programming through mass media. The American people have been thoroughly duped about the Republican elite's "moral" movement concerning children. This movement is advanced by pedophiles at the very top of government, which is completely consistent with Mind Control variables regarding the inexplicable Machiavellian manipulator. Until the American public is made fully aware of the inexplicable realm in which these criminals operate, these children will continue to be exploited in the most heinous manner.
Sexual humiliation was used at Abu Ghraib prison by CIA "deprogrammers" due to Iraqi Mind Control. Most Mind Control employed around the world is Alpha-level and sex-based at childhood through the normalization of childhood sexual repression. Failure of these cultures to provide their non-elite children with the parental duty of sex education indoctrinates the child with state authority programming through terror. This effectively sets the child up for full mental manipulation with programmed events like 9/11. Many mesmerist churches have evolved with the same sexual repression programming which programs the sacred and the demonic.
One of the first tricks of Nazi Mind Control is to program fathers in the demonic parts of the mind, thus transferring authority from father to the state "Daddy" figures of the military.
To stop eugenicide in America, you must begin with your own children. Our children were deliberately empowered to talk about sex and learn the truth about sex and power, because they are being Nazified and dumbed-down by their own government! Such Nazification becomes obvious by studying the video games, television and movie programming which programs children. Continual repetition of themes which build groupthink conformity in news also provides powerful deep programming. This same government then used this empowerment of the parental duty as an excuse to rape-kit and destroy these children with outrageous lies, force and deception. The bureaucrats literally know nothing about the parental duty. Because the adults were fully programmed by Freudian sex taboos, they fully fall for this basic Nazi sex scam which destroys the parental duty in the entire community.
What is the real reason why Americans now fall for basic Nazi sex tricks? Sophisticated sexual ethics development from real parents would have protected them, but a government which brainwashes its children does not want sophisticated ethics development which protects children. Violation of the parental duty is the root of many social and personal ills. The historically all-important parental duty of childhood empowerment, the only protection from these powerful taboos and a slave-making government, is fully destroyed in nearly the entire culture and good parents are being lynched nearly everywhere. Freud even told our own "elite" how to program these taboos to build this wrongful power system. This is a very ancient slave-making system which still functions at the subconscious level, programmed by "entertainment." This is but one reason why European films are much different than American. None of these horrific facts are allowed in a real court of law. Why?
The King Kong movie featuring Jessica Lange was a Bohemian Grove blood sacrifice and pre-programming for the 9/11 attacks. As pre-programming, terror is used to program the collective unconscious of much of the nation serving to legitimitize the future terror events with conditioned responses and acceptance. The blood sacrifice of the beast functions at the subconscious level where a fire ceremony was employed to torment the beast and the military was employed to sacrifice the beast at the World Trade Center alter to build broad "crowd control" conformity for the ritual, as is the goal of Tavistock programming of false flag terror attacks.
This normalization of Nazi Mind Control in America is extremely important to understand, as these bureaucrats want to program your own children with the same taboos and through Tavistock, Freud told our own government how to program these taboos for eugenics and mass delusion. The eugenics movement in America is now destroying millions of families based upon programmed sex taboos. As nature intends for children to first fall in love with their parents in order to learn critical lessons of life, the mass destruction of the parental duty by government rednecks has profound implications.
The spreading of "crowd control" devices, false terror and animal spirits in adults by secret government requires the "depatterning" of the childhood mind away from normal development. The parental alienation process is now programmed into children at very early ages and is widely viewed by the mind-controlled as a good thing. They are so repleat with programmed bogey-man myths that normal child development is impossible. These are basic Nazi sex tricks and we are better than that. But they become very powerful over generations through media programming and groupthink conformity. This is the true source of terror programming which serves secret government slave-making. The secret federal government then spreads powerful subconscious control devices, pornography, violence programming, drugs and usury devices, to achieve broad eugenics results and political programming of "authority." None of which comes from real parents and serves only to destroy real parental authority. Real parental authority must be destroyed early in the child's life. We have very strong evidence to believe that the Bohemian Grove death cult has engineered AIDS and Nazi Mind Control to be used against the American people for eugenics. Such sex and death programming requires learned ignorance about sex at childhood. So protecting your children from these sex taboos and sex predator myths is extremely important.
We are researching the child trafficking methods being used in Bedford, Pennsylvania, home of Hitler's eugenics movement. A documentary and book entitled Destroyed: The Secret War on American Children will feature the stories of many children destroyed by a system that advances a government mythic system based on terror and trauma conditioning that make slaves and Nazifies children. The atrocities done to my own family will be fully documented. Even Mengele, the Nazi "Angel of Death," worked on this slave-making system. You may find this subject ridiculous until you actually study it. Your input into this important work is greatly appreciated. The states are now kidnapping and brainwashing children through scientific fraud, constitutional treason and bureaucratic dysfunction on a massive scale. View some of the children destroyed for a Nazi-inspired system that makes slaves.
Many Americans are so thoroughly brainwashed by mass media programming that the actual facts of their government's "war on terror" comes as a brutal and bizarre revelation. Most are literally too afraid to enter into the truth. But this is the realm of PsyOps for which your current government now operates. One of the darkest revelations of American brainwashing of children comes from European Freudian experts who have worked for decades to "deprogram" Europe from Nazi Mind Control operations. Little do Americans understand that Nazi Mind Control has been "normalized" right here in the U.S..
This Nazification of children in America is now so normalized that few even question it, largely because these atrocities are fully controlled by wrongful, secret government's psychological warfare program. Psychological warfare against the American people is so utterly unconstitutional, that it is fully covert and fully "normalized" as "news" and "entertainment." This powerful emotional programming over-rides the rational mind. The Age of emotional programming known as Mind Control then over-rides the Age of Reason. Nazification requires sexual repression at childhood as the parental duty centers the child's mind for understanding emotional programming from a rational perspective. But we are recording the work of this darkest of places, in an age of darkness, as these most disturbed and Nazified people destroy families like they are primitive savages. Such destruction of the parental duty builds on the taboos and myths for which children are reduced to utter slavery, so Americans have been made deliberately dumbed-down about what sexual repression means.
Europeans are not so naive. Hitler knew that bigotry programming was deeply irrational and emotion based. His assault on reason is well known in Europe as an assault on the parental duty. Sexual repression comes from the slave-making arts and Hitler's eugenicists tried very hard to legitimatize and normalize sexual learned ignorance in children. Ignorant Americans now routinely depict such abused children as "innocent." Nothing is further from the truth! These children are being made "programmable" for powerful subconscious programming via government-themed mass media. They are then programmed for a powerful form of neurosis where the "Illuminati" and the media itself are programmed as top-down "parental" entities and this programming is extremely unnatural and harmful to the individual. This brainwashing of top-down authority successfully reverses the power structure of our Constitution, destroying millions of U.S. families. Parents are no longer respected with basic parental and civil rights, all due to the tyranny of Nazi Mind control brought to the U.S. by over 600 Nazi agents. It only serves wrongful government. Such wrongful programming of children often results in hysteria which is now routinely depicted as "sex abuse" by parents. This is a basic Nazi sex scam.
Kill the messenger is the first mission of Mind Control and kill they have! PsyOps created this realm where up is down and black is white. By fully dominating your media, secret government programming becomes a powerful church, you are to conform to this powerful groupthink conformity and live your entire life suspended in a trance of totalitarian deception where there is absolutely no clarity at the top of government. The realm of the Machiavellian manipulator is pure theatre. Your leader may present himself as Pope while he is secretly a mobster. The only problem with this scheme is that your subconscious mind is smarter than that. Your subconscious mind knows that you are being slowly enslaved from within. You will feel deep alienation and fear and will not know that the true source is military PsyOps. But now you can know for sure, by studying the real history of Mind Control.
Alfred Hitchcock was a product of Tavistock, British Intelligence, and began the entire Horror genre which deeply programs and "depatterns" the mind in regard to psychic terror, sex and knives killing fertility symbols. Most major horror films began with PsyOps Operations which blend sex and death programming for eugenics and Pentagon military conditioning and recruiting. Paramount Studios specializes in sexing-up top-down military programming for children. Horror films like The Exorcist were produced by Air Force PsyOps experts. This programs deep sexual taboos and terror with fertility symbols in juxtaposition with the "parental protectors" who are usually programmed as government agents. Ian Flemming worked with J.Edgar Hoover to program FBI agents as "parental." Most CSI-styled programming now routinely employs horror to program the parental government and demonize the individual citizen.
Americans are conditioned to reject the powers of the mesmerist arts, but how else is terror known to the subconscious mind? "Shell shock" is relatively rare in American troops today due to horror conditioning.
Where governments brainwash their children, the most enlightened of families will be targeted first, just as in Nazi Germany. Subconscious slavery requires the destruction of the historically all-important parental duty. This is where "mental hygiene" is used to fully invert the idea of reality deep inside of children. These cases become critical for exposing a massive brainwashing fraud. This is because the enlightened will represent the highest threat and will in fact be a substantial threat to wrongful government. Therefore, they are subject to the most draconian repression. Where such brainwashing of children is viewed as illegal under the Constitution, such wrongful government will employ deep programming which will be smothered in layers of deception to hide its true source. Foreign subsidiaries of intelligence operations like Tavistock will be paid billions of dollars to brainwash your children into a totalitarian mythic system which desexes them later and later into their development. This Nazification process is heralded as normal and necessary just about everywhere except where elite parents demand the truth. Nazified bureaucrats and local "authorities" in the vast non-elite world will enslave those children whose parents do not conform with this brainwashing. Mass media will both advance brainwashing and omit critical information which will expose it as a massive fraud. This is in fact how our current mass media system, controlled by the Bohemian Grove, actually operates.
Deep programming is the hypnotist's realm and not the realm of honest government. The Atomic Age has advanced the war-logic that honest government is too naive and dangerous, as lesser evils are perceived as necessary to prevent greater evils. Therefore your government warped into an age of Mind Control under a war-logic of totalitarian deception, where all power is covert. The problem is, Mind Control is no lesser evil. It fully inverts our core value system and brings back absolute slavery. It builds a totalitarian mythic system based upon irrational fear and disinformation which becomes the beast. What you hear, see, smell and taste is theatre and theatre is a hammer for the elite mind programmer. Over generations, Nazi Mind Control was secretly pounding away and transforming a good American culture into a Nazi war machine and the evidence is all around you.
All that is required of wrongful government is that it dominates and themes this theatre for its own purposes. Such theatre becomes so seductive over generations, that you will not see the forest for the trees. It becomes an all-consuming mythic system which serves the elite mind programmer. If you grow up in the propaganda factory, you will not see it as propaganda, it simply becomes part of your religion which must inevitably destroy that religion. It is a cancer on your Constitution as well. Those held in ignorance of this wrongful power system become the very marionettes who actively advance it. Your government employs the "Illuminati" to do brainwashing missions for which they themselves are ignorant and this mass mesmerism requires the "programmable child" who is denied the reality principle from real parents.
Gay Republicans of Bedford County, Pennsylvania promote the renovations of the historic Bedford Springs Hotel as the true Gay White House and Seat of Barbaric Justice. This historic location is slated to become the home of "Northern Decadence," a festival drawing on the enormous popularity of "Southern Decadence" before the ravages of hurricane Katrina in New Orleans. Now gays, lesbians, transvestites and transgendered "perverts" will enjoy an ideal location in the North, in Bedford, Pennsylvania.
This scenic, rural Pennsylvania location is home to President Buchanan's summer White House, where he entertained his gay friends in lavish festivals while the United States trembled angrily toward Civil War. As one of his gay lovers was a Southern slave owner, this relationship fueled a largely word-of-mouth conspiracy in the area of Bedford which quickly spread throughout the North. Known for its "medicinal" springs, Bedford Springs Hotel functioned as the private sexual spa for the Supreme Court itself during the 1850s, a unique distinction in the Court's history. It was here where the inhumane and barbaric "Dred Scott" decision was toasted over fine wine and caviar declaring that Blacks were property and not entrusted with Constitutional Rights. The anger over this injustice and destruction of Dred Scott's family led to the Civil War. In extreme irony, Queen Victoria, known for her extreme sexual repression, was the first state figure to telegraph our President while in his gay lair at Bedford Springs. He was reportedly naked at the time.
As a symbol of both racial and sexual discrimination in America, Bedford Springs is an historic location for building awareness of the continued prejudice in America that now destroys nearly 700,000 minority families annually through active government programs. Few Americans are aware of these highly duplicitous programs and how they actually work. After all, the very science that explains the duplicity of these programs are actively repressed through force and massive disinformation. This is not the case in post-Nazi Europe, where these devices of wholesale family destruction have been used before. But a simple analysis of modern American Justice and Child Trafficking services are fully exposed at RobertsCourt.com as we petition the Supreme Court of the United States to investigate just how this illegal and unconstitutional Child Trafficking actually works. This website is critical for anyone trying to understand how full-blown discrimination still functions in America in 2008 as racial and political "depopulation" programs by targeting children. These crimes against children are so heinous that they must be suspended in silence, darkness and complete ignorance, and this fraud against basic human rights has worked since the Civil War.
The "outed" politicians who have been disgraced for bad sexual behavior in Washington are laughing all the way to the bank. For their social programs which target children are now law, and they are enjoying the kickbacks from an illegal Child Trafficking industry that targets your children. This child trafficking is largely financed by programs coming down from the Bohemian Grove death cult. Our website is designed to investigate these illegal practices and petition our government for much needed investigations and reform.
Not only is Bedford historic for Civil War and Supreme Court history, it was home to significant Revolutions in opposition to tyranny including the first known attack on a British garrison in 1765, now Fort Bedford, by Colonial Rebels known as "The Black Boys." The town square hosted bizarre public executions, floggings and draconian punishments for trivial crimes. This masochistic tradition found its full expression in the Indian scalpings of settlers in the area, a horror introduced by the French during the French and Indian War.
Even today, this strangely repressed community actively promotes the Gay White House even as it destroys families in order to socially engineer fatherless children and traffic them for profit. This "peculiar institution" needs to be exposed through federal action. The children of "Liberals" and cultural minorities are targeted through employing the sexually repressed traditions and bigotries of far-right Republicans who manage progressive programs first designed to "help" poor children. Republicans now veto any health initiatives for children and attempt to dumb down our children through oppressive "protection" services. They now routinely employ basic hypnotic brainwashing techniques against mothers and small children first developed in Nazi Germany for the creation of slaves. They do so as top-down cyborgs fully programmed by the "science of demoralization" perfected by the Skull and Bones eugenicists. I propose that cyborgs are not full citizens, but only 3/5 a citizen, for cyborgs are unable to understand the Constitution of the United States.
Now children are routinely taught sexual fears and sexual amplification against their own parents which are exploited through police power and serve to provide the local governments with orphans for profit. View this family engineering and modern institutional sadism where a first-grader and her younger sisters were savagely exploited by an out-of-control Nanny-state agency. We appeal to the Supreme Court, Congress and International Courts for basic human rights and basic parental rights at: RobertsCourt.com
"On April 6, 1848, a slave named Dred Scott and his wife Harriet sued for their freedom in this Courthouse. The Scotts had been taken by their owner to free jurisdictions and then returned to Missouri, a slave state. In 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney of the U.S. Supreme Court (holding session at Bedford Springs Hotel) announced the decision in the case of Dred Scott v. Sanford. He stated that Americans of African ancestry were not eligible to be citizens based on the historical claim that they 'had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.' Taney's opinion also declared that Congress could not prevent the spread of slavery into the Western territories. This decision fueled sectional conflicts which led to the Civil War."
All of these efforts at Reverse Mind Control will be vehemently attacked in an attempt to discredit the obvious truth. The important thing to remember is that this truth movement is based upon fact and real science, not propaganda, superstition or CIA mind tricks! Our secret federal government has been highly active in changing our entire psychological community and our culture from a parent-based power structure to a government-based power structure of absolute deception. But all of this manipulation is based upon voodoo, witchcraft and propaganda, not reason or sound science. This most corrupt of administrations is advancing psychological attacks against the American people for which we are meant to believe no one, not even our family or friends. This divide and conquer propaganda will only increase dramatically in the coming months.
Americans must advance truth as our Founding Fathers prescribed based upon reason, fact and not emotion. Record these crimes and demand justice. This government is actively demonizing parents and true patriots through the witchcraft of Mind Control in order to replace them with the New World Order's version of the parent: The Sun King. But this Nazi Mind Control will be thoroughly exposed!
In a post-Orwellian age of absolute deception, nothing is more bizarre than the truth. You are being sexually assaulted by devices your conscious mind cannot detect in order to demoralize and destroy millions of American families. We are finding subliminal seduction effects throughout our "free" media and even during the 911 terror events. Exposing Mind Control in media will be the next frontier for freedom.
The Nazi elite who actually financed and empowered Hitler are now in charge of your secret federal government and its many disinformation campaigns, including the war on "terror." Terror happens to be a prerequisite for all trauma-based Mind Control. They have successfully reversed our Constitution through Mind Control programming. Marionette programming now functions in "child services" organizations, as these marionettes are programmed to place your child in hypnotic suggestion, mine your child's mind for eroticistic exploitation. They will then eroticise your child's memories by turning normal and necessary events which were never traumatic to the child into "sexual" events which then become very traumatic for the child. They will then take your child as a result of their own trauma-making activities and make them mind-slaves for the Pentagon. This is the full power and horror of Nazi Mind Control being applied to millions of American children. You will not believe it, because you were programmed not to believe it. This is the "Sun King" trust programmed into you as the Constitution vanishes before your eyes.
The Republican Nazi elite have advanced "war logic" over our Constitution for generations. What is "war logic?" War logic is basic deception and duplicitous force used and advanced by many CIA "tricks." When the CIA operates a $200-$300 billion dollar/year drug trade around the world, they simultaneously flood powerful drugs into targeted ghettos and minority neighborhoods in America. This trick then requires a "war on drugs" to demonize and destroy countless minority families. This trick serves eugenics. When the government actively destroys the economy of these same locations, it stresses the population and creates crime. A "war on crime" is then employed to imprison massive minority populations and the populations of political non-conformists to this fraud. This war serves eugenics. When the secret federal government stages fake terror attacks on American citizens and builds broad conformity to these lies by keeping all evidence out of real courts and thoroughly manipulating the press, this allows this fraudulent government to kill millions of innocent people around the world, enrich its political supporters, demonize its political opponents and utterly destroy our Constitution. This "war on terror" serves eugenics.
Now the president has absolute powers to round-up all Americans through bogus terror attacks and inoculate them. That literally means a third-generation Nazi can round up your kids and inoculate them with drugs from the same companies that worked with Hitler. The truth is far more interesting than any fiction. Parents have a constitutional right to raise, educate and protect their children in historical truth, sexual truth, build sexual objectivity and sexual values so that their children are not easily manipulated by obvious Nazis and conspirators against our Constitution. Step up to our Constitution or step out!
"Because of its power and global interests U.S. leaders have committed crimes as a matter of course and structural necessity. A strict application of international law would ... have given every U.S. president of the past 50 years Nuremberg treatment." --Edward Herman
The United States ended World War II by using the most horrific weapon in the history of warfare—the atomic bomb—on the Japanese civilian population. This doomsday weapon had been developed in total secrecy as part of a massive research program employing a small army of world-class scientists. After the war, the United States scrambled through the rubble and chaos to determine what progress its enemies had made in their secret weapons development programs. It turned out that the Germans’ atom bomb effort was primitive compared to the Manhattan Project. However, the Germans and the Japanese had made progress in other areas – and we were obsessed over finding out just how much.
Two of the “weapons’’ we sought information on had nothing to do with the traditional field of battle, but their ramifications would be enormous. Using volumes of information gained from German and Japanese experiments conducted on concentration camp prisoners, POWs and entire civilian populations, the U.S. continued its enemies’ research programs in mind control[i] and biological warfare.[ii] It even employed some of the war criminals that managed these programs as consultants at Fort Detrick[iii],[iv] for experiments using U.S. citizens and soldiers as guinea pigs.
The Manhattan Project infrastructure itself was employed in this regard.[v] Under this umbrella, the U.S. hoped to duplicate its success in creating devastating weapons by perfecting the mind-control technology developed by the Germans[vi] and the biological warfare technology developed and tested by the Japanese.
The postwar effort to develop novel weapons was substantially different, however, from that which produced a super-bomb capable of leveling an entire city. Instead of using physics and chemistry to harness the fundamental forces of nature, these new weapons would exploit the fields of psychology and biology to manipulate the fundamental processes required for mental[vii] and physical health in humans. By unlocking the keys to the brain and the body, the United States would be able to induce diseases at will for psychological or biological warfare. These weapons ultimately had the potential to be more devastating than the atom bomb since they could not only control both mental and physical health on an unprecedented scale but, more importantly, could be tested and used in complete secrecy.
To refine the weapons developed by its enemies in WWII, the Central Intelligence Agency launched an immense program of clandestine research and international experimentation on human subjects. By covertly leveraging the U.S. medical infrastructure, the CIA was able to orchestrate this experimentation under the pretense of legitimate research by doctors who often didn't realize the sinister ends to which their research would be used.[viii]
The initial mind-control research was conducted toward nominally noble ends—even if the means to achieve them were abominable. Like their counterparts in other fields, the nation’s elite psychologists and psychiatrists attempted to create human diseases on-demand so that cures could be tested under laboratory conditions. For example, research geared toward selectively inducing hypnotic amnesia and drug-induced schizophrenic states would provide doctors with a way of testing theories on the causes of neurosis and mental illness. Medical research with biological agents had similarly stated goals. Human experiments with “anticancer viruses” such as West Nile Virus and with “cancer transplants” in subjects with impaired immune systems would allow scientists to test their theories of how the immune system controlled the growth of diseases. Such information would assist in manipulating the human immune system toward the development of cancer vaccines.
But of course these experiments toward inducing laboratory models of mental and physical diseases were not conducted purely for medical purposes. Much of this research was conducted for psychological and biological warfare applications, and even then under the pretext of developing defensive measures against enemy use of such technology. For example, learning how to destroy memory and manipulate personality through stress, drugs and hypnosis might allow researchers to counteract these processes and “inoculate” their men against enemy use of such techniques in hostile interrogations. (Ted Kaczynski, the “Unabomber,” was the victim of exactly this type of research as a student at Harvard.) Likewise, knowledge of how immunity could be destroyed by chemicals and viruses to cause disease would provide clues critical to counteract these processes in the development of vaccines. Such vaccines would allow the government to inoculate its own troops against bioweapons used by national security threats.[ix]
Toward even more sinister ends, this research also provided an offensive capability. Supposedly defensive mind-control research[x] would give the CIA the ability to create agents and operatives who would carry out their assignments in the midst of danger without risk of their becoming security threats.[xi] Through mental conditioning and the creation of synthetic, multiple personalities, interrogation-proof double agents could be produced who would not only safely transfer information as human couriers (to a friendly hypnotist) but obediently commit acts such as assassinations that were contrary to their personal morality and safety. Agents with enhanced or selectively depleted memories could even be sent into the field to accomplish tasks they would have no conscious recollection of completing.[xii]
Work on vaccines had dual uses as well. By developing the technology to selectively deplete the immune system, researchers could develop an understanding of how immune system defects caused disease. This information could then be used to counteract such processes and selectively enhance the immune system in the form of vaccines.[xiii] But the ability to controllably destroy the immune system was in itself a biological weapon that could be used as part of an offensive capability.[xiv] And these offensive and defensive tools could be used synergistically. Defensive vaccines could be developed that would allow U.S. forces to be inoculated against offensive bioweapons to be used on enemy forces.[xv]
Theory is one thing, implementation quite another. Has the U.S. government, through its agencies, transformed “could” and “would” into “can” and “will”? Did it actually bring research in psychological and biological warfare to the next level? Years of study have convinced me that this has happened and is happening to this very day. Consider:
* The technology developed to control the immune system—selectively depleting immune cells with viruses in animal cancer-transplant experiments—was exploited to induce the epidemic of AIDS and cancer in humans. This latter epidemic is highly beneficial for fulfilling the goals of both the cancer vaccine research and national security establishments, the two fields that worked synergistically to create AIDS viruses grown in human cells just prior to the HIV epidemic. My book AIDS: The “Perfect” Disease explains how such biological warfare agents were not only created under the pretext of cancer research but unleashed under the pretext of an international cancer experiment.[xvi] In this way, the United States echoed the wartime international biological warfare exercises conducted by the Japanese researchers it recruited following WWII using immunosuppressive viruses it perfected through decades of cancer experiments in animals.[xvii]
* Nazi mind-control techniques were covertly perfected by U.S. intelligence agencies after decades of research on hundreds of victims,[xviii] ultimately yielding the ability to control the human mind to create “programmed” provocateurs, double agents and “involuntary assassins.” According to declassified government documents published by the New York Times, such agents would carry out actions “even against such fundamental laws of nature as self-preservation.” The most egregious crime from these creations was the programming of the assassin used to murder President John F. Kennedy. My book The Perfect Assassin shows how Lee Harvey Oswald’s seemingly contradictory actions are eerily consistent with his being unwittingly manipulated through mind control by the CIA through the now legendary Cold War programs MKULTRA and COINTELPRO. The benefits of Oswald’s actions to the CIA and the foreshadowing of his activities in CIA memos and statements of military hypnotists are revealed in my harmonizing study of the JFK murder.
* Mind-control experimentation is also an enabling technology to maintain a population of human guinea pigs for biological experimentation. The use of AIDS within this framework of experimentation is an extraordinary vehicle to continue the long-running eugenics program to create a master race overseen by American corporations in Nazi Germany. I believe much of U.S. policy is designed to quietly perpetuate this brutally destructive and elitist program. My book Hitler Is Winning describes the tragic legacy and current dangers of this ongoing effort quietly sponsored by history’s deadliest and unpunished war criminals—including America’s elite universities, corporate foundations and political and financial luminaries.
While discussion of mind control and biological warfare by our own government is disconcerting to many, and incredible to some, it is only through public awareness of these subjects that I believe national security planners can be held accountable and thus be prevented from their continued use. For those interested in exploring these subjects further, please read my works explaining the development and use of these weapons available at www.winstonsmith.net.
[i] Ironically, one of the American biowarfare experts sent into Germany on a fact-finding mission would later die under suspicious circumstances as a result of being an unwitting participant in a CIA mind-control drug experiment similar to those conducted by the Nazis he was tasked with interviewing. Frank Olson, a U.S. government anthrax expert, had been sent to Germany in 1951 with two other men as part of a CIA program to evaluate progress made in Nazi mind-control research. In this case it was the research overseen by “Nazi anthrax expert and SS Major General Dr. Walter P. Schreiber” during the war. As H.P. Albarelli Jr. reported, the U.S.team “traveled to Germany to interview Schreiber” and learn “all that it could about a Nazi SS project that employed ‘psychochemical drugs’ during concentration camp interrogation experiments.” H.P. Albarelli Jr., “Feds’ involvement in anthrax experiments: Records show conflicting reports about bacterium’s use as weapon;” WorldNetDaily.com, 9/21/01, (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25406).
[ii] Americans also scrambled to get data from Japanese biological warfare experts such as Dr. Shiro Ishii, the head of Japan’s biowarfare establishment. (This establishment, known as Unit 731, killed tens of thousands of civilians in field tests with biowarfare agents it developed in tests on prisoners of war.) Lt. Col. Arvo T. Thompson interviewed Ishii after his capture by American forces: “In Japan, Thompson interviewed Ishii, who had been captured by the U.S. Army Counter Intelligence Corps. …A top-secret U.S. Army Far East Command report on Thompson’s findings reads: ‘The value to the U.S. of Japanese biological weapons data is of such importance to national security as to far outweigh the value accruing from war-crimes prosecution.’ A 1956 FBI memorandum reveals that by the mid-1950s the U.S. knew everything about Ishii’s human experiments but agreed not to prosecute in exchange for Japan’s scientific data on germ warfare.” Like Frank Olson, Thompson later committed suicide: “In May 1951, scientists at Fort Detrick were shocked to learn that Thompson had ‘committed suicide’ while on another special assignment in Tokyo. The circumstances surrounding Thompson’s death have never been publicly revealed. Two years later, Olson would also ‘commit suicide’ under circumstances so unusual that eventually he became an icon of American mysteries.” H.P. Albarelli Jr., “Feds’ involvement in anthrax experiments: Records show conflicting reports about bacterium’s use as weapon;” WorldNetDaily.com, 9/21/01, (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25406).
[iii] War criminals from both enemy camps would be hired as consultants and brought to lecture at Fort Detrick, Maryland—the U.S. center for biological warfare development. According to Fort Detrick researchers, the chief Japanese biological warfare researcher (Ishii), along with other Japanese researchers, “was secreted into the United States to lecture at Camp Detrick…. on Unit 731's human experiments.” http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25406
[iv] “Remarkably, despite his being wanted for war crimes and strong suspicions that he was acting as a double agent for the Russians, [Nazi SS Major Walter P. Schreiber] was hired to work with the U.S. Army’s Counter Intelligence Corps. On Oct. 7, 1951, the New York Times reported that Schreiber was in Texas working for the U.S. Air Force. After his employment contract with the Army and Air Force expired, the CIA blocked plans to send Schreiber back to Germany and in May 1952 helped arrange his relocation to Buenos Aires where he was employed as an expert on ‘disease and epidemics’ by the Argentine government. Some former Fort Detrick researchers who declined to be identified maintained that Schreiber, on at least two occasions, lectured at the Frederick, Md., facility. Others maintain that Schreiber was relocated to Argentina so he could help facilitate the flow to the United States of other fugitive Nazi scientists hiding there.” H.P. Albarelli Jr., “The secret history of anthrax: Declassified documents show widespread experimentation in ‘40s,” WorldNetDaily.com, 9/06/01, (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25220); H.P. Albarelli Jr., “Feds’ involvement in anthrax experiments: Records show conflicting reports about bacterium’s use as weapon;” WorldNetDaily.com, 9/21/01, (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25406).
[v] John Marks, The Search For The Manchurian Candidate (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1979), pp. 6-8.
[vi] Marks reports that the Nazis first conducted mind-control experiments with mescaline “to eliminate the will of the person examined.” While the Nazis experimented on “Jews, gypsies, Russians and other groups on whose lives the Nazis place little or no value,” American scientists using exactly the same techniques (for example, slipping the drug into a person’s drink) with even more powerful chemicals would test these substances on the American public at-large. Like the Nazis, the Americans would also use drugs in combination with hypnosis for mind-control experiments. Marks, p. 4, 5.
[vii] Quoting CIA sources, the New York Times summarized the “25-year, $25-million effort by the Central Intelligence Agency to learn how to control the human mind.” The CIA “sought to crack the mental defenses of enemy agents—to be able to program them and its own operatives to carry out any mission even against their will and ‘against such fundamental laws of nature as self-preservation.’” Nicholas M. Horrock, “Private Institutions Used in CIA Effort to Control Behavior,” New York Times, August 2, 1977.
[viii] This research was secretly financed and orchestrated through a network of CIA-controlled foundations.
[ix] There is a historical precedent for this scenario, which goes back to the very formation of the Republic. George Washington vaccinated his recruits against smallpox to protect them from suspected biological warfare attempts by the British. It is known that the British used such measures against Indian populations. According to an article on the PBS website: “During the French and Indian War in 1763 the British Commander-in-Chief Sir Jeffrey Amherst wrote to Colonel Henry Bouquet about the using smallpox against Indians: ‘Could it not be contrived to send smallpox among these disaffected tribes of Indians? We must use every stratagem in our power to reduce them.’” The BBC reported the favorable response to the letter: “The colonel replied: 'I will try to inoculate the [Native American tribe] with some blankets that may fall in their hands, and take care not to get the disease myself.' Smallpox decimated the Native Americans, who had never been exposed to the disease before and had no immunity.”
[x] John Marks described how offensive mind-control research was related to defensive research. According to Marks, the early mind-control researchers “quickly realized that the only way to build an effective defense against mind control was to understand its offensive possibilities. The line between offense and defense—if it ever existed—soon became so blurred as to be meaningless.” John Marks, The Search For The Manchurian Candidate (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1979), p. 25.
[xi] As John Marks summarized: “Caught in the muck and frustration of ordinary spywork, operators hoped for a miracle tool. Faced with liars and deceivers, they longed for a truth drug. Surrounded by people who knew too much, they sought a way to create amnesia. They dreamed of finding means to make unwilling people carry out specific tasks, such as stealing documents, provoking a fight, killing someone or otherwise committing an antisocial act. … Plagued by the unsureness, agency officials hoped to take the randomness—indeed, the free will—out of agent handling. … Thus the impetus toward mind-control research came not only from the lure of science and the fantasies of science fiction, it also came from the art of the spy business.” John Marks, The Search for the Manchurian Candidate (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1979), pp. 52, 53.
[xii] Mind-control technology could also be used to extract information from enemy agents or even turn them into unwitting double agents.
[xiii] This process was designed to induce immunoproficiency through creating immunodeficiency. See Why AIDS Was Invented, by the author.
[xiv] In addition to helping researchers understand how to increase the lethality of bioweapons, the ability to selectively deplete the immune system would allow the government to turn everyday diseases into biowarfare agents. Through the use of this technology, the U.S. could selectively destroy entire populations considered national security threats.
[xv] In the 1960s, the U.S. considered using smallpox as a bioweapon against the Vietnamese since U.S. soldiers were vaccinated against the disease while the Vietnamese were not. “A boomerang effect seemed unlikely, since American troops were routinely vaccinated against the contagious disease. And North Vietnamese troops appeared to be vulnerable. In some ways, the setting was ideal. Though Vietnam had experienced no smallpox outbreaks since 1959, the disease still lurked in neighboring countries, allowing an epidemic to be attributed to natural causes. In the argot of covert operations, the strike would be plausibly deniable, a key requirement.” Judith Miller, Stephen Engelberg, William Broad, Germs, (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2002), pp. 60, 61, 74.
[xvi] This technology allowed planners to selectively deplete not only populations of immune system cells but entire populations in the Third World.
[xvii] In my book, I summarize the evidence that this biological warfare exercise was conducted under the pretext of administering vaccines, including the smallpox vaccine. Curiously, there is a historical precedent for the use of smallpox vaccination in a biological warfare exercise. According to a BBC article by Colette Flight: “It has been alleged that smallpox was also used as a weapon during the American Revolutionary War (1775-83). During the winter of 1775-76, American forces were attempting to free Quebec from British control. After capturing Montreal, it looked as if they might succeed. But in December 1775, the British fort commander reportedly had civilians immunized against the disease and then deliberately sent out to infect the American troops. A few weeks later a major smallpox epidemic broke out in the American ranks, affecting about half of the 10,000 soldiers. They retreated in chaos after burying their dead in mass graves.”
[xviii] The Scotland Sunday Times reported the activities of an internationally respected Canadian doctor recruited by the CIA: “Doctor Ewan Cameron, who became one of the world’s leading psychiatrists, developed techniques used by Nazi scientists to wipe out the existing personalities of people in his care.” Under Cameron’s “care,” patients were kept on LSD for months at a time so they could be brainwashed. According to the Times, “Patients were woken from drug-induced stupors two or three times a day for multiple electric shocks. In a specially designed ‘sleep room’ …Cameron placed a speaker under the patient’s pillow and relayed negative messages for 16 hours a day.” One of Cameron’s victims was Gail Kastner, who after 50 years, has finally gotten her lawsuit appealed in the Canadian courts. According to the Times, “Kastner was a 19-year-old honors student suffering from mild depression when she first underwent ‘treatment’ in 1953. On returning home she sucked her thumb, demanded to be fed from a bottle, talked in a baby voice and urinated on the floor.” This court case opens the possibility of compensation for hundreds of more victims. “Brainwash victims win cash claims,” Karin Goodwin, The Sunday Times, Scotland October 17, 2004.
Jerry Leonard is a physicist who has been actively involved in microelectronics research and production for over 15 years. He has numerous patents and publications related to his scientific career. In his personal research he has analyzed the extensive though hidden role American corporations played not only in creating Nazi Germany but in recruiting Nazi war criminals following the war. Jerry documents how this resulted in the continuation of the unethical human experimentation conducted in Nazi concentration camps--including mind control research, which he proposes ultimately led to the assassination of JFK, and vaccine research, which he proposes led to AIDS and the continuation of Hitler's eugenic mission. http://www.winstonsmith.net
(It's been over 10 years since Annie Machon and David Shayler resigned from MI5, to blow the whistle on an act of False Flag terror by British intelligence in Libya, and other deceptive practices by intelligence agencies in the UK and abroad. In 2006, Machon gave a Keynote speech at the landmark Chicago 9/11 Truth Conference, introducing her story to a wider audience. In 2006-7, Machon organised three UK and European tours for William Rodriguez. She traveled and spoke with him at over 40 engagements, last year she spoke in California. She has also organised European speaking tours for Richard Gage and David Ray Griffin, and shared a platform with Cynthia McKinney in Amsterdam in 2007. Starting in May, Machon will be speaking at a number of places in Canada. To learn more about this speaking tour, and to possibly add your city to the itinerary, please contact Elizabeth Woodworth: elizwood(at)shaw.ca or Patrick Borden: omtrayumbakam(at)yahoo.com. -rep.)
911blogger: Ms. Machon, what is your current relationship with David Shayler? Do you still believe that Shayler had a genuine breakdown, or was his breakdown perhaps premediated, with the intent of making 9/11 Truth advocates look batty?
Machon: David and I separated almost three years ago, and I'm now living in Germany with my partner and Molly the cat.
I have very little contact with David now, which is strange after the intensity of our years together, when we blew the whistle, had to go on the run around Europe, watch as our friends, family, supporters and journalists were arrested, live in France for 3 years and survive two high-profile court cases.
It's a shame it all happened just before the internet, electronic media archives, and youtube were endemic - otherwise people would be able to see, at the click of a mouse, just how big a scandal it was, what we went through, and how vicious the response was from the government and intelligence agencies. The story has been largely forgotten and spun by the media, and my book (which described the full case) was buried.
Our involvement with the 9/11 movement started in 2005 at a journalism conference where we were trying to publicise the book, when a leading UK 9/11 activist approached us. We were actively "head hunted" by the nascent UK movement, and for the first year Shayler's name and profile really helped build it - media interviews, speaking tours etc.
Then he started to get more and more erratic, and increasingly intractable in his views, until he started talking about speculative fringe theories such as "no planes" in public, and the whole campaign was ridiculed by the media in the UK.
During 2006 I was working flat out on building the movement with interviews and speaking tours. David and I argued about his approach constantly towards the end of our relationship and it was a factor in our split, as I felt angry that he was jeopardising all this work from so many people with his views.
That said, in my view it was a genuine breakdown - I think the hero-worship for the whistleblowing from certain sectors of society and the vilification by others, plus the constant isolation and struggle to survive, led inevitably to this victim (sacrificial/Messiah) mentality. I think it was just a traumatised mind's survival mechanism.
I feel desperately sad about that a man who acted with the bravest and best of intentions should have been treated this way and brought to this state. And angry that the supine mainstream media did not hold the spies and government to account, but colluded in destroying a good man's reputation.
That said, it's difficult enough to get the general public to even ask the basic questions about 9/11. I think that going in at the deep end with subjects like NPT/space beams, let alone announcing that you're the Messiah, is inevitably going to damage the movement.
911blogger: You don't have to name names, but have you encountered MI5 operatives involved with infiltration of the 9/11 Truth movement in the UK?
Machon: I doubt if even MI5 would be incompetent enough to send in someone I'd recognise!
There is a very British muddle in how surveillance is done in the UK. It's not just MI5 we have to worry about, there are also police Special Branch sections (ie secret police - every force has one), as well as a massive growth in the private security companies that are also being used to watch activists - all utterly deniable of course. There was a good article about this in The New Statesman Magazine.
Also, work is strictly delineated within MI5. Intelligence officers (which is what I was) tend to co-ordinate operations; agents are people specifically recruited to infiltrate groups, and their identities are a closely guarded secret even within the service, so it would be highly unlikely that I would bump into anyone I would recognise.
That said, I did a speaking event in London last year and a former counter-terrorism officer from the Metropolitan Police, who has been battling the Met for the last few years and whom I'd met on a couple of TV projects, did tell me that he recognised one of his former colleagues in the audience. Perhaps he was just there out of interest....
911blogger: Does MI5 in the UK, and MI6 abroad, actively recruit Muslims, who then in turn recruit other Muslims for "al Qaeda" -- but really just wind up as Patsies to be blamed for False Flag terror? And is this really what "al Qaeda" is? A Western intelligence operation? Or do you think it is more complex than that?
Machon: The illegal MI6 plot to assassinate Colonel Gaddafi of Libya in 1996 was was a classic case of such false flag terrorism, and was the primary reason Shayler and I blew the whistle.
In this, MI6 funded a Libyan military intelligence officer, codenamed Tunworth, to organise this attack using a group of Islamic extremists with links to "Al Qaeda". The attack occurred when Gaddafi was returning from Sirte in a cavalcade of cars and an explosion occurred beneath the wrong car. Gaddafi obviously survived, but innocent people were killed in the ensuing security shoot-out.
As well as being unethical and highly reckless in a volatile part of the world, the operation was also illegal under UK law. MI6 is supposed to be governed by by the 1994 Intelligence Services Act. Under this law, MI6 officers can have immunity for illegal acts carried out abroad (the real "James Bond" license to kill), but only if they have prior written permission from their political master - the Foreign Secretary. In this case, they had no such permission.
We repeatedly tried to give evidence about the Gadaffi plot to the government; to this day they have refused to accept it, even though an MI6 document was leaked in 2000 proving the plot, and sources in French and US intelligence were aware of it. When Shayler exposed this crime in 1998, he was thrown in prison in Paris because the British government tried (and failed) to extradite him. There was huge pressure for an enquiry, but the government managed to spin its way out of one.
Of course, it's generally accepted that "Al Qaeda" began with the CIA's support for the mujahadin in Afghanistan in the 1980s. Also, that the links continue to this day. But "Al Qaeda" has also become an ideology, a franchise that genuinely angry Muslims will sign up to. So it's a mixed bag.
911blogger: Is there a political party in the UK that offers a real alternative for 9/11 Truth advocates? For example, is there a political party that demands a dismantling or serious overhaul of MI5/MI6?
Machon: Unfortunately not. The UK Green Party expressed some interest in the issue of 9/11 a while ago, but that went nowhere. The mainstream political parties won't touch it. The issue was getting a lot of coverage in the UK a couple of years ago, but since then the campaign has been fragmented by arguments about whether we should focus on a credible political campaign, a la David Ray Griffin or Richard Gage, or focus on the "bigger picture". Many people chose the latter, and this made it ridiculously easy for the media and political classes to dismiss the subject as pure conspiracy theory.
Ditto with the reform of the intelligence community. Whistleblowers are always dismissed as "Walter Mitty" fantasists who are disgruntled or too junior to know what they're talking about (think Shayler, Dr David Kelly, Katherine Gunn, Richard Tomlinson). By attacking and dismissing the whistleblower, the government and spooks thereby manage to avoid enquiries into the very grave disclosures. The only time that MPs were roused to ire was when one of their own was arrested by Special Branch last year: Conservative MP Damien Green.
MI5 holds information on many senior politicians in the UK, which might explain their reluctance to rein in the spooks. This is a real problem for a democracy - very much a case of the tail wagging the dog.
I have been arguing for years now that we need a radical overhaul of the intelligence agencies. They are completely unaccountable and above criticism and, as such, become self-perpetuating oligarchies. By throwing more power, money and resources at them to counter the "war on terror", we just make the existing problems bigger, not better.
So, the best thing that the politicians could do would be to step back and ask: what are the REAL threats to our national security and, based on that, how can we best protect ourselves from them? I would argue we should dismantle MI5. MI6 and GCHQ, with all their attendant historical baggage, and establish a new agency that has to work within strictly defined parameters, obey the law, and work under real democratic oversight.
Much more information about this can be found at www.anniemachon.com
911blogger: In Yuri Felshtinsky's new book, he shows that the KGB/FSB have engaged in False Flag terror to demonize Muslims in Chechnya. Recently, it was revealed in the New York Times, and elsewhere, that the Mossad recruited and ran a cousin of one of the alleged 9/11 hijackers as an asset. Can you cite some other examples of other nation's intelligence agencies engaging in this practice?
Machon: Certainly. The classic example is the Israeli Embassy bombing in London in 1994. In this case, two innocent Palestinians studying in London, Samar Alami and Jawed Botmeh, were befriended by someone called Reda Moghrabi, who then asked for help in buying a second-hand car. That car subsequently exploded outside the embassy, and Alami and Botmeh were convicted of conspiring to cause a terrorist attack and sentenced to 20 years each. Moghrabi was never traced.
MI5's official assessment of this attack, after reviewing all the evidence and all the intelligence, was that Mossad had attacked their own embassy in a controlled explosion. They did this for two reasons: first to gain enhanced security around Israeli interests in London, and secondly to shatter a fast-growing Palestinian support network in which Alami and Botmeh happened to be active.
This was one of the cases we blew the whistle on. You would think that there would have been an immediate retrial, but the government managed to avoid this as it would have justified the whistleblowing, and two innocent people continue to languish in prison.
Additionally, there was a similar attack in Buenos Aires in 1994. A few years ago, the government there DID order a judicial enquiry, and this revealed that Mossad had carried out that attack too.
911blogger: Are there any good books out there that tell a realistic version of how MI5/MI6 operates?
Machon: Glad you asked! My book is called "Spies, Lies and Whistleblowers". It was banned for 15 months by MI5, buried by the national media in the UK and is now, I believe, rather difficult to get hold of.
Also, Mark Urban, formerly of military intelligence and currently at the BBC, wrote a good book called "UK Eyes Alpha: Inside British Intelligence", which gets the tone right, and Stephen Dorril writes well-researched books, although he has no insider knowledge of the agencies.
911blogger: Thanks to the internet, we know much more about how "intelligence agencies" operate, and a growing realization of elite control that just didn't exist on any significant level 20 years ago. Faced with the Orwellian power of the mainstream media, do you think we even have a chance of waking enough people up to change Western society sufficiently to put an end to False Flag terrorism?
Machon: The internet could be our salvation - we need to be our own media. We increasingly see citizen journalists recording and reporting facts that the MSM choses to ignore - only last week during the G20 demonstrations in London, a man was assaulted by a police officer and died. The MSM and the police claimed that he just collapsed, but a bystander had captured what really happened on film.
Of course, the MSM is part of the establishment, no longer the Fourth Estate. In the UK, is easily manipulated and controlled by secrecy laws, as well as patronage and spin from the spies and government. There's a very good book out called "Flat Earth News" by Nick Davies that charts the demise of real investigative journalism.
So, yes, it's difficult to spread the word about 9/11 quickly and effectively. We need urgently to reach out beyond the choir. Many people around the world are appalled by the deaths of innocent millions in the illegal Middle East wars; and many are also appalled that the "war on terror" is used as an excuse to shred our freedoms and constitutional rights.
We need to place 9/11 at the heart of these discussions, but we will only have a chance of doing this if we are disciplined in our campaigning, no matter what our personal beliefs or interests are. The stakes are just too high.
April 7, 2009 Commentary by Tim Jones Electronic Frontier Foundation, Deeplinks Blog
We had hoped this would go differently.
Friday evening, in a motion to dismiss Jewel v. NSA, EFF's litigation against the National Security Agency for the warrantless wiretapping of countless Americans, the Obama Administration's made two deeply troubling arguments.
First, they argued, exactly as the Bush Administration did on countless occasions, that the state secrets privilege requires the court to dismiss the issue out of hand. They argue that simply allowing the case to continue "would cause exceptionally grave harm to national security." As in the past, this is a blatant ploy to dismiss the litigation without allowing the courts to consider the evidence.
It's an especially disappointing argument to hear from the Obama Administration. As a candidate, Senator Obama lamented that the Bush Administration "invoked a legal tool known as the 'state secrets' privilege more than any other previous administration to get cases thrown out of civil court." He was right then, and we're dismayed that he and his team seem to have forgotten.
Sad as that is, it's the Department Of Justice's second argument that is the most pernicious. The DOJ claims that the U.S. Government is completely immune from litigation for illegal spying -- that the Government can never be sued for surveillance that violates federal privacy statutes.
This is a radical assertion that is utterly unprecedented. No one -- not the White House, not the Justice Department, not any member of Congress, and not the Bush Administration -- has ever interpreted the law this way.
Previously, the Bush Administration has argued that the U.S. possesses "sovereign immunity" from suit for conducting electronic surveillance that violates the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). However, FISA is only one of several laws that restrict the government's ability to wiretap. The Obama Administration goes two steps further than Bush did, and claims that the US PATRIOT Act also renders the U.S. immune from suit under the two remaining key federal surveillance laws: the Wiretap Act and the Stored Communications Act. Essentially, the Obama Adminstration has claimed that the government cannot be held accountable for illegal surveillance under any federal statutes.
Again, the gulf between Candidate Obama and President Obama is striking. As a candidate, Obama ran promising a new era of government transparency and accountability, an end to the Bush DOJ's radical theories of executive power, and reform of the PATRIOT Act. But, this week, Obama's own Department Of Justice has argued that, under the PATRIOT Act, the government shall be entirely unaccountable for surveilling Americans in violation of its own laws.
This isn't change we can believe in. This is change for the worse.
For further reading, we suggest Salon.com's Glenn Greenwald and The Atlantic's Marc Ambinder. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EFF: Obama DOJ's Warrantless Wiretapping Arguments Are Worse Than Bush's By Mike Masnick, Tech Dirt April 8th, 2009
On the issue of warrantless wiretapping, we've never been given a clear explanation by anyone why it makes sense to allow the government to totally skip over the warrant process...
The EFF has an analysis of the new Justice Department in trying to get one of the warrantless wiretapping cases dismissed, noting that the new administration appears to be taking an even more extreme position than the previous administration (which was already quite extreme).
Deeplink by Tim Jones Last night (4/7/09), Countdown With Keith Olbermann on MSNBC had excellent coverage of and commentary on the Obama DOJ's radical new arguments in Jewel v. NSA, the EFF's lawsuit against the NSA for illegal surveillance. Olbermann's second guest, GWU Law Professor Jonathan Turley, aptly summarizes why the new ruling is so disappointing:
"I think right now, the Bush people are bringing out their mission-accomplished sign, because they've not only gotten Obama to protect Bush and Cheney and others from any criminal investigation on torture, but he's now gone even further than they did in the protection of unlawful surveillance. This is the ultimate victory for the Bush officials. They have Barack Obama adopting the same extremist arguments, and in fact exceeding the extremist arguments made by President Bush...
"You cannot any longer suggest that President Obama is advancing the civil liberties and the privacy interests that he promised to advance. This is a terrible roll-back. It's a terrible decision.
Ed. note: PLEASE go read this... many links, more information, litigation, FAQ's, etc. (and support EFF!!) --
Eff's Info Page on NSA Spying:
NSA Spying
The U.S. Government, with assistance from major telecommunications carriers including AT&T, has been engaging in a massive program of illegal dragnet surveillance of domestic communications and communications records of millions of ordinary Americans since at least 2001.
In 2005, after the New York Times broke the story of the surveillance program, the President publicly admitted one portion of it -- warrantless surveillance of Americans believed to be communicating with people connected with terrorism suspects. Senior Bush Administration officials later confirmed that the President's authorization went beyond the surveillance of terrorists and conceded that the program did not comply with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The President, invoking a theory of limitless executive power to disregard the mandates of Congress, has reauthorized this warrantless surveillance more than thirty times, including after the Department of Justice found the program to violate criminal laws, and has indicated that he intends to continue doing so.
Shortly after the initial revelations, a whistleblower named Mark Klein came forward with evidence describing the specific AT&T facilities, including one on Folsom Street in San Francisco [PDF], where the handoff of customer communications is occurring. Mr. Klein's evidence confirms the many newspaper reports that the government is engaging in dragnet surveillance of the domestic communications of millions of ordinary Americans.
EFF is fighting this surveillance on several fronts. In Hepting v. AT&T, EFF filed the first case against a telecom for violating its customers' privacy. In response to EFF's success in the case, and the filing of dozens of other cases across the country that attempted to hold law breaking telecoms accountable, the Bush Administration and the telecommunications carriers sought retroactive immunity for the carriers for their participation in the illegal surveillance. On July 9, 2008, Congress passed the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, which was intended to force the dismissal of Hepting v. AT&T and the other telecom lawsuits. EFF is working to challenge this law and hold telcoms accountable for their illegal behavior.
In addition, EFF is representing victims of the illegal surveillance program in Jewel v. NSA, a lawsuit filed in September 2008 against the government seeking to stop the warrantless wiretapping and hold the government officials behind the program accountable.
EFF is not alone in this fight. There are multiple cases challenging various parts of the illegal surveillance against both the telecoms and the government. This page collects information on EFF's cases as well as cases brought by individuals, the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California and of Illinois, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and others.
MUCH more at http://www.eff.org/issues/nsa-spying ...
'Devil's Advocate' jury finds no proof he was behind Sept. 11
By Scott Roxborough April 9, 2009, 12:37 PM ET Hollywoodreporter.com
Photo: Hollywoodreporter.com
BERLIN -- A Dutch TV jury has found Osama bin Laden not guilty of the Sept. 11 attacks.
In the conclusion Wednesday night to the show "Devil's Advocate" on Dutch public broadcaster Nederland 2, the jury of two men and three women, along with the studio audience, ruled there was no proof bin Laden was the mastermind behind the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in 2001.
The Netherlands, home to "Big Brother" creator Endemol, is known for being on the cutting edge of format-based television. But even for Dutch standards, "Devil's Advocate," from Amsterdam production house AVRO, pushes the envelope.
The show features star defense attorney Gerard Spong standing up for some of the world's worst criminals.
In the latest show, Spong was able to convince the jury that bin Laden's connection to Sept. 11 was a product of "Western propaganda." The jury also ruled there was insufficient evidence to prove bin Laden was the real head of terrorist network al-Qaida. However, the jury did rule that bin Laden is a "terrorist who has misused Islam."
The show is certain to provide further ammunition in the already heated Dutch debate over immigration and the country's large Muslim minority. The Netherlands saw a sharp rise in anti-immigration and anti-Islamic sentiment after the 2004 murder of Dutch director Theo Van Gogh by a Muslim extremist.
Spong has been at the center of the debate, supporting legal action against anti-immigrant politician Geert Wilders. Dutch TV show exonerates Osama bin Laden 'Devil's Advocate' jury finds no proof he was behind Sept. 11
By Scott Roxborough
April 9, 2009, 12:37 PM ET BERLIN -- A Dutch TV jury has found Osama bin Laden not guilty of the Sept. 11 attacks.
In the conclusion Wednesday night to the show "Devil's Advocate" on Dutch public broadcaster Nederland 2, the jury of two men and three women, along with the studio audience, ruled there was no proof bin Laden was the mastermind behind the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in 2001.
The Netherlands, home to "Big Brother" creator Endemol, is known for being on the cutting edge of format-based television. But even for Dutch standards, "Devil's Advocate," from Amsterdam production house AVRO, pushes the envelope.
The show features star defense attorney Gerard Spong standing up for some of the world's worst criminals.
In the latest show, Spong was able to convince the jury that bin Laden's connection to Sept. 11 was a product of "Western propaganda." The jury also ruled there was insufficient evidence to prove bin Laden was the real head of terrorist network al-Qaida. However, the jury did rule that bin Laden is a "terrorist who has misused Islam."
The show is certain to provide further ammunition in the already heated Dutch debate over immigration and the country's large Muslim minority. The Netherlands saw a sharp rise in anti-immigration and anti-Islamic sentiment after the 2004 murder of Dutch director Theo Van Gogh by a Muslim extremist.
Spong has been at the center of the debate, supporting legal action against anti-immigrant politician Geert Wilders.
The 9/11 Truth movement exposes the explosive force used to bring down the twin towers in a media event for mass Mind Control purposes. The way the buildings were utterly pulverized on 9/11 required a million times more energy than a "pancake" styled collapse. The freefall speeds at which the buildings fell would be impossible due to structural resistance of an enormous steel core. But during a Mind Control media event, millions of people would rely on their media to expose these facts, unaware that their media is unconstitutionally controlled to keep these facts secret. Goto the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth information website. As seen in this revealing photo, the Twin Towers' destruction exhibited all the characteristics of destruction by explosives: (and some non-standard characteristics)
1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration
2. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution
3. Extremely rapid onset of destruction
4. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes
5. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally 600 ft at 60 mph
6. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking
7. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds
8. 1200-foot-dia. debris field: no "pancaked" floors found
14. No precedent for steel-framed high-rise collapse due to fire
And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed.”
Exposing the fraud against children of abuse, Dr. Gardner advanced the Parental Alienation Syndrome in American Family Courts. He viewed sex education of children as a fundamental and innate duty of parents, now under attack by many courts. As an advocate for 9/11 Truth, Richard exposed the link between government brainwashing activity and parental alienation. He was publicly and savagely attacked for these professional insights. Suffering from advancing symptoms of type I Complex Regional Pain Syndrome and no longer capable of standing the pain, Gardner took his own life on May 25, 2003, using a kitchen knife to stab himself multiple times in the chest and neck, so we are told. A deeper story is that he was targeted by CIA assassins for his work in exposing childhood brainwashing, which is largely sex based.
The key requirement of Nazi Mind Control is sexual repression at childhood. The historically all-important parental duty of sex education is suppressed or demonized in order to keep children unnaturally ignorant and "programmable."
Gardner's main contribution was to draw attention to parental alienation processes, that is, how one parent may misuse the powers of socialization to turn a child against a once loved parent. Gardner's labeling of alienation processes as a "syndrome" remains controversial among psychiatrists, psychologists and therapists.Parental alienation syndrome has been extensively criticized by some scientists and jurists, who describe it as inadmissible in child custody hearings based on both science and law.
The issues he raised, by their nature, stirred considerable controversy. Because of this, he felt compelled to publish a rebuttal before he died. Noteworthy scholars such as Bruce Sales have cast serious doubt upon the workings of the family courts in the United States and elsewhere. Furthermore, scandals in New York City and San Diego have blown open a small window into the world of custody evaluation and revealed what may be a massive corruption scam. Gardner has been criticized for his atypical views on sexuality and pedophilia. His views have been compared to The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), a political, civil rights and educational organization that advocates sex between adult males and male children. It has been stated that Gardner’s theory of human sexuality, sees "adult-child sexual contact as benign and beneficial to the reproduction of the species."
Richard Gardner, as a denial of such infamant assertions, explained Misperceptions versus facts about Richard A. Gardner, and was published in The American Journal of Family Therapy October 2002: « I believe that pedophilia is a bad thing for society. I do believe, however, that pedophilia, like all other forms of atypical sexuality is part of the human repertoire and that all humans are born with the potential to develop any of the forms of atypical sexuality (which are referred to as paraphilias by DSM-IV). My acknowledgment that a form of behavior is part of the human potential is not an endorsement of that behavior. Rape, murder, sexual sadism, and sexual harassment are all part of the human potential. This does not mean I sanction these abominations. ».
"As a political advocate, Gardner lobbied to abolish mandated reporting of child abuse, to abolish immunity for reporters of child abuse, and for the creation of federally funded programs to assist individuals claiming to be falsely accused." Hyper abuse hysteria is the deliberate attempt to destroy the parental duty of sex education so as to advance wrongful custody or brainwashing activities, most of which are covert.
His work in exposing "childhood sex abuse" allegations with a disturbing trend toward childhood brainwashing and parental alienation are found in these reports and lectures:
1986
(1) June 11 "The Parental Alienation Syndrome" The Ninth Annual Herschfeld Lecture St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center Paterson, New Jersey
(2) Oct. 30 "The Parental Alienation Syndrome" New Jersey Society for Adolescent Psychiatry Nutley, New Jersey
1987
(3) Jan. 13 "Differentiating Between Bona Fide and Fabricated Sex-Abuse Allegations in Children" New Jersey Institute for Continuing Legal Education Jamestown, New Jersey
(4) Oct. 31 Full-Day Series of Presentations on the Differentiation Between Fabricated and Bona Fide Sex Abuse Allegations of Children Victims of Child Abuse Laws (VOCAL) Tampa, Florida
(5) Nov. 4 "Child Sex Abuse Allegations: Actual and Fabricated" "Mental Health Association of Essex County East Orange, New Jersey
1988
(6) Feb. 5 Full-Day Lecture Series on Psychotherapy of Child Sex Abuse and Other Forms of Childhood Psychopathology Charter Hospital Jacksonville, Florida
(7) Feb. 26 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Custody Litigation, Child Sex Abuse, and Child Psychotherapy Kings View Psychiatric Center Reedley, California
(8) Feb. 27 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Sex Abuse and Child Therapy Clinical Training, Inc. Los Angeles, California
(9) March 4 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Sex Abuse and Child Psychotherapy Psychological Associates Raleigh, North Carolina
(10) March 11 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Custody Litigation, Child Sex Abuse, Psychotherapy of Child Sex Abuse, and Family Therapy Brookhaven Psychiatric Pavilion Dallas, Texas
(11) March 25 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Sex Abuse and Child Psychotherapy Clinical Training, Inc. Chicago, Illinois
(12) April 16 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Custody Litigation and Sex Abuse State University of California at Fullerton Fullerton, California
(13) June 28 Full-Day Series of Presentations on the Psychiatric and Legal Aspects of Child Custody Litigation and Child Sex Abuse (A joint legal and psychiatric seminar) Forbes Regional Health Center Monroeville, Pennsylvania
(14) Sept. 30 "The Parental Alienation Syndrome and the Differentiation Between Fabricated and Genuine Child Sex Abuse" American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers New York, New York
1989
(15) March 11 "Is the Allegation of Sexual Abuse Fabricated or Genuine?" The Illinois Trial Lawyers Association Chicago, Illinois
(16) May 17 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Sex Abuse, Divorce, and Attention-Deficit Disorder Parkland Hospital Baton Rouge, Louisiana
(17) June 9 Full-Day Lecture Series on child Custody Litigation and Child Sex Abuse Division of Child Psychiatry Oregon Health Sciences University Portland, Oregon
(18) June 16 Full-Day Series of Presentations on Parental Alienation Syndrome, Child Custody Litigation, and Child Sex Abuse The Interdisciplinary Committee on Child Custody Denver, Colorado
(19) Nov. 17 The Parental Alienation Syndrome and Differentiating Between Fabricated and Bona Fide Sex Abuse State Board of Arizona Phoenix, Arizona
1990
(20) Feb. 17 Full-Day Lecture Series on Custody Litigation and Child Sex Abuse Baptist Medical Center Jacksonville, Florida
(21) June 22 One Week (half-days) Lecture Series on Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy Albert Einstein Colllege of Medicine Eleventh Cape Cod Institute Eastham, Massachusetts
(22) Oct. 4 "True and False Allegations on Child Sex Abuse" Department of Child Psychiatry Queens Children's Psychiatric Center New York, New York
(23) Dec. 1 "Differentiating Between Fabricated and Bona Fide Sex Abuse Allegations" "Psychotherapy of Child Sex Abuse" Department of Psychology Adelphi University Garden City, New York
1991
(24) March 1 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Custody and Sex Abuse Litigation Raising a Healthy Child, Inc. Tallahassee, Florida
(25) March 21 "Differentiating Between True and False Sex-Abuse Accusations "Attention Deficit Disorder: Fact or Fantasy?" SHP/Health Shield Poughkeepsie, New York
(26) April 19 Half-Day Lecture Series on Child Sex Abuse Half-Day Lecture Series on Child Psychotherapeutic Techniques Green Oaks Psychiatric Hospital Dallas, Texas
(27) Sept. 25 "Differentiating Between True and False Child Sex Abuse" New York Society of Forensic Sciences Lehman College Bronx, New York
(28) Oct. 3 Full-Day Lecture Series on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Child Sex Abuse D.W. McMillan Memorial Hospital Brewton, Alabama
(29) Oct. 11 "Differentiating Between True and False Child Sex- Abuse Accusations" Department of Psychiatry Manhattan Psychiatric Center Wards Island, New York
1992
(30) March 20 "The Parental Alienation Syndrome" "Child Custody Litigation" National Council on Children's Rights Arlington, Virginia
(31) April 3 Full-Day Series of Presentations on Child Custody Litigation and Child Sex Abuse Creative Educational Enterprises Nemacolin Woodlands Farmington, Pennsylvania
(32) April 8 "Guidelines for Deciding Child Custody Disputes" "Differentiating Between True and False Child Sex- Abuse Accusations" Superior Court Judges Orientation Seminar Princeton, New Jersey
(33) May 1 "Differentiating Between True and False Accusations of Child Sex Abuse" "The Parental Alienation Syndrome" (Keynote Speech) Ninth Annual Conference New York State Council on Divorce Mediation Suffern, New York
(34) Aug. 3-7 Five Half-Day Lecture Series on Child Custody, Sex Abuse, Psychotherapeutic Games, The Antisocial Child, and Family Therapy Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Cape Cod Institute Eastham, Massachusetts
(35) Aug. 29 Half-Day Lecture Series on Child Custody Litigation National Council for Men and Children Detroit, Michigan
(36) Oct. 14 "Differentiating Between True and False Sex- Accusations in Child Custody Disputes" Department of Child Psychiatry St. Vincent's Hospital New York, New York
(37) Nov. 5 Keynote Presentations Half-Day Lecture Series on the Parental Alienation Syndrome Half-Day Lecture Series on Differentiating Between True and False Sex-Abuse Accusations Thirtieth Annual Meeting of the American Association of Matrimonial Lawyers Chicago, Illinois
1993
(38) Feb. 5 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Psychotherapeutic Techniques Desert Hills Center for Youth and Families Tucson, Arizona
(39) Feb. 27 "Psychological Evaluation of the Allegedly Abused Child" "Psychotherapy of Child Sexual Abuse" Dept. of Psychology Adelphi University Garden City, New York
(40) April 2 Half-Day Lecture Series on Child Psychotherapeutic Techniques Half-Day Lecture Series on Sexual Abuse in Children and Adults Methodist Richard Young Hospital Omaha, Nebraska
(41) April 15 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Custody Litigation and Child Sexual Abuse (to mental health professionals) University of Kansas Medical Center Hays, Kansas
(42) April 16 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Custody Litigation and Child Sexual Abuse (to law enforcement and legal professionals) University of Kansas Medical Center Hays, Kansas
(43) April 19 Full-Day Lecture Series in the Treatment of Children, Adolescents, and Families Independence, Ohio
(44) April 20 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Sex Abuse Columbus, Ohio
(45) May 1 "Revising the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act: Our Best Hope for Dealing with Sex-Abuse Hysteria in the U.S." National Council for Children's Rights Seventh National Conference Bethesda, MD
(46) May 6-7 Two-Day Lecture Series on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Sexually Abused Children Lancaster County Committee on Child Abuse Lancaster, Pennsylvania
(47) May 12 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Psychotherapeutic Techniques Baptist Health Care Center Beaumont, Texas
(48) May 22 "The Parental Alienation Syndrome: Families in Which Sexual Abuse Has Been Fabricated" The Association of Trial Lawyers of America National College of Advocacy Las Vegas, Nevada
(49) July 25 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Psychotherapeutic Techniques Department of Psychology Fairleigh Dickinson University Teaneck, New Jersey
(50) Aug. 20 Full-Day Lecture Series on Differentiating Between True and False Sex-Abuse Accusations University of Lund Lund, Sweden
(51) Sept. 17 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Sexual Abuse Family Service of Beaver/Butler County Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
(52) Oct. 1 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Psychotherapy and Sex Abuse The Family Service League of Suffolk County West Islip, New York
(53) Oct. 16 Child Sex Abuse and Hysteria: 1890s (Austria)/1990s (U.S.) 1993 Sigmund Freud Laureate Lecture The Society of Medical Psychoanalysts New York, New York
(54) Oct. 28-29 Two-Day Lecture Series on Child Sexual Abuse Sponsored by David R. Lima, ACSW, Inc. Continuing Education Seminars Orlando, Florida
(55) Nov. 11-12 Two-Day Lecture Series on Child Sexual Abuse Sponsored by David R. Lima, ACSW, Inc. Continuing Education Seminars Worcester, Massachusetts
(56) Nov. 19 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Custody Litigation Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah
1994
(57) Feb. 17 One-Hour Presentation "Child Sexual Abuse: Distinguishing Fact from Fiction" The Carrier Clinic Belle Mead, NJ
(58) Mar 10-11 Two-Day Lecture Series on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Child Sex Abuse and Differentiating Between True and False Accusations Sponsored by David R. Lima, ACSW, Inc. Continuing Education Seminars Mentor, Ohio
(59) April 8 Full-Day Series of Presentations:"Contemporary Issues in the Treatment of Child Sex Abuse" Dept. of School Psychology Bucknell University Lewisburg, PA
(60) April 9 One-Hour Presentation: "Sex-Abuse Hysteria in the United States" National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Washington, D.C.
(61) April 13 Half-Day Presentation on Child Sexual Abuse Annual Meeting, Children's Rights Council Washington, D.C.
(62) Apr. 28-29 Two-Day Lecture Series on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Child Sex Abuse and Differentiating Between True and False Accusations Sponsored by David R. Lima, ACSW, Inc. Continuing Education Seminars Mentor, Ohio
(63) May 14 Full-Day of Presentations on The Parental Alienation Syndrome and Differentiation Between True and False Accusations of Child Sexual Abuse Forensic Psychological Services Tempe (near Phoenix) Arizona
(64) May 26 Full-Day Series of Presentations on Assessment and Treatment of Child Sex Abuse Psychologists Association of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta - Canada
(65) June 3 Full-Day Series of Presentations on Child-Custody Litigation and Child Sexual Abuse Tenth Family Law Institute State Bar of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico
(66) June 24 Full-Day Series of Presentations on True and False Accusations of Child Sex Abuse Utah Psychological Association Utah Chapter, National Association of Social Workers Salt Lake City, Utah
(67) Aug. 15-19 Five Half-Day Presentation Series on Child Sexual Abuse Albert Einstein College of Medicine Cape Cod Summer Institute Eastham, Massachusetts
(68) Sept. 12-13 Two-Day Lecture Series on Child Sexual Abuse and Psychotherapeutic Techniques Garrison House Seminars Front Royal, Virginia
(69) Sept. 23 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Sexual Abuse School of Continuing Education Marywood College Scranton, Pennsylvania
(70) Oct. 5-6 One-and-a-Half-Days of Presentations on Child Sexual Abuse University of Oslo Oslo, Norway
(71) Oct. 27 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Sexual Abuse Sponsored by David R. Lima, ACSW, Inc. Continuing Education Seminars Detroit, Michigan
(72) Nov. 11 "Child Sex Abuse and Suggestibility" The 1994 Litigation/Claims Management Conference Eagle International Associates New York, New York
(73) Nov. 17 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Sexual Abuse Sponsored by David R. Lima, ACSW, Inc. Continuing Education Seminars Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
1995
(74) Feb. 11 Full-Day Presentation Series on Child Custody Litigation and Child Sex Abuse Idaho Psychiatric Association Boise, Idaho
(75) March 24 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Sex Abuse Sponsored by David R. Lima, ACSW, Inc. Continuing Education Seminars Charlotte, North Carolina
(76) April 1 "Differentiating Between True and False Sex-Abuse Accusations in Child-Custody Disputes" Keynote Presentation Council for Children's Rights Washington, D.C.
(77) June 8 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Sexual Abuse Sponsored by David R. Lima, ACSW, Inc. Continuing Education Seminars St. Louis, Missouri
(78) June 9 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Sexual Abuse Sponsored by David R. Lima, ACSW, Inc. Continuing Education Seminars Kansas City, Missouri
(79) Oct. 12 "Sex-Abuse Hysteria in the United States: The False Sex-Abuse Accusation" Eagle Associates London, England
1996
(80) Feb. 20 "The Embedment in the Brain Circuitry Phenomenon" The American Society of Psychoanalytic Physicians New York, New York
(81) Mar. 14 "Differentiating Between True and False Sex-Abuse Accusations in Child-Custody Disputes" Grand Rounds Presentation New York Medical College Valhalla, New York
(82) June 19 "Sex-Abuse Hysteria in the United States: How It Arose and What We Can Do About It" The Presbyterian Hospital New York, New York
(83) Sept. 13 Full-Day Lecture Series on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Childhood Sexual Abuse The Child Protection Team and the Wyoming Chapter of the National Association of Social Workers Laramie, Wyoming
(84) Oct. 3 "Sex Abuse Hysteria: Fact or Fantasy?" The Eighth Annual Linda M. Weissman Memorial Lecture The Pennsylvania Hospital Philadelphia, PA
(85) Oct. 11 Full-Day Lecture Series on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Childhood Sexual Abuse Montana Chapter of the National Association of Social Workers West Yellowstone, Montana
(86) Nov. 18 Full-Day Lecture Series on the Psychotherapy of Common Childhood Disorders David R. Lima, ACSW, Inc. New Orleans, LA
1997
(87) Feb. 18 "Repression, Dissociation, and Sexual Abuse Accusations: Is Your Patient's Sex-Abuse Allegation Fact or Fantasy?" Society of Medical Psychoanalysts New York, New York
(88) April 30 "Sex Abuse Hysteria in North America and Western Europe: Will the Hysteria Spread to Russia?" Department of Psychology University of St. Petersburg St. Petersburg, Russia
(89) May 9 "Is Truth in Jeopardy? True and False Accusations of Child Sexual Abuse" Full Day Program Presented Jointly with Stephen J. Ceci, Ph.D. Sponsored by the Ohio Bar Association Columbus, OH
(90) June 6 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Psychotherapeutic Techniques Lima Associates Boston, Massachusetts
(91) Oct. 23 Half-Day Lecture on the Parental Alienation Syndrome Half-Day Lecture on the Differentation Between True and False Sex-Abuse Accusations in Child Custody Disputes National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland
(92) Oct. 24 Half-Day Lecture on Differentiating Between the Parental Alienation Syndrome and Bona-Fide Abuse Children's Rights Council Washington, D.C.
(93) Dec. 11 Half-Day Lecture on Differentiating Between True and False Sex-Abuse Accusations Charter Behavioral Health Systems of New Jersey Summit, New Jersey
1998
(94) Feb. 20 Full-Day Lecture Series on Child Psychotherapeutic Techniques Department of Psychology University of Loyola, Maryland Campus Columbia, MD
(95) March 1-5 Four Full-Day Lectures on Child Psychotherapeutic Techniques and Forensic Child Psychiatry Israel Institute for Systemic Studies and Family and Personal Change Herzylia, Israel
(96) May 14 Full-Day Lecture Series on the Parental Alienation Syndrome and Differentiating Between True and False Child Sex Abuse Lima Associates Springfield, New Jersey
(97) May 20 Children of Divorce South Carolina Association of Marriage and Family Counselors Charleston, South Carolina
(98) May 21 Psychotherapy with Children of Divorce South Carolina Association of Marriage and Family Counselors Charleston, South Carolina
(99) June 5 The Parental Alienation Syndrome Department of Psychiatry, Mt. Sinai Hospital New York, New York
(100) June 24 The Parental Alienation Syndrome Open University Breda The Netherlands
(101) June 29- July 3 Five Half-Day Lecture Series on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Child Sexual Abuse Albert Einstein College of Medicine Cape Cod Summer Institute Eastham, Massachusetts
(102) Aug. 23-24 Two-Day Lecture Series: 1) Psychotherapeutic Techniques with Children and Adolescents 2) The Parental Alienation Syndrome: Diagnosis and Treatment Lima Associates Indianopolis, Indiana
(103) Aug. 26-27 Two-Day Lecture Series: 1) Psychotherapeutic Techniques with Children and Adolescents 2) The Parental Alienation Syndrome: Diagnosis and Treatment Lima Associates Cleveland, Ohio
(104) Sept. 26 1) PAS and Sex Abuse Accusations: Update 2) Misperceptions Versus Facts About Richard A. Gardner Children's Rights Council Old Town Alexandria, Virginia
(105) Oct. 4-5 Two-Day Lecture Series: 1) Psychotherapeutic Techniques with Children and Adolescents 2) The Parental Alienation Syndrome: Diagnosis and Treatment Lima Associates Atlanta, Georgia
(106) Oct. 7-8 Two-Day Lecture Series: 1) Psychotherapeutic Techniques with Children and Adolescents 2) The Parental Alienation Syndrome: Diagnosis and Treatment Lima Associates Nashville, Tennessee
(107) Oct. 16 Psychotherapy with Children of Divorce Carrier Clinic Belle Mead, NJ
(108) Oct. 30 Half-Day Lecture on The Parental Alienation Syndrome: Diagnosis and Treatment The American Academy of Forensic Examiners New York, New York
(109) Nov. 12 Full-Day Lecture Series on the Parental Alienation Syndrome, Child Sexual Abuse, and Psychotherapeutic Techniques Waukesha Memorial Hospital Waukesha, WI
2000
(110) Feb. 17 The Parental Alienation Syndrome Long Island Jewish Medical Center New Hyde Park, New York
(111) June 15- 16 Two-Day Lecture Series on Psychotherapeutic Techniques with Children and Adolescents and The Parental Alienation Syndrome: Diagnosis and Treatment Lima Associates Minneapolis, Minnesota
2002
(112) Sept. 5-6 1) "The Parental Alienation Syndrome" 2) "Differentiating Between True and False Sex Abuse Allegations in Child Custody Disputes" Pathways Treatment Center Whitefish, Montana
(113) Sept. 10 "The Causes of the Denial of the Word Syndrome in The Parental Alienation Syndrome" Kensington Institute London, England
(114) Oct. 19-20 1) "The Parental Alienation Syndrome: Past, Present and Future 2) "How the Denial of the Parental Alienation Syndrome Harms Women International Conference on the Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) Frankfurt/Main Germany
2003
(115) Jan. 30 The Parental Alienation Syndrome Grand Rounds Presentation The Montefiore Hospital Medical Center Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx, NY
RobertsCourt.com is a Supreme Court blog dedicated to exposing the truth behind American brainwashing. We address the issues of brainwashing, 9/11 Truth, child advocacy and empowerment and parental rights in the Age of Mind Control. If you find our opinions extreme, please understand that we back up these opinions with enormous factual evidence and that much of this truth must be repressed in a hypocritical nation which brainwashes its children in the name of "freedom," "truth" and "endless war."
The better paradigm would be freedom, love and endless peace all of which is consistant with teaching your children the truth at the proper times in their development and keeping them away from the sex Nazis in America. Parental sex education as a right to life is repressed in those countries which brainwash their children.
The truth is, most American children are taken away from true freedom and truth very early in their development and are denied normal development. This brainwashing has been thoroughly "normalized" as "patriotism" through a highly controlled mass media. It is not.
Note these facts: 500,000 American's are estimated to contract HIV/AIDS due to sexual ignorance and intellectual blindness in regard to sexuality imposed at childhood. Since this intellectual blindness is secretly advanced by government for the purpose of brainwashing, governments are not likely to empower and protect children. Only enlightened parents can protect and empower their own children through comprehensive and timely sex education.
Brainwashing of children and 9/11 Truth is so important that many in the movement to expose these crimes have been killed. We promote the Exceptional Patriots who understand the true meaning and mission of the Constitution of the United States. We appeal to the Roberts Court, Supreme Court of the United States and Congress for truth and justice. Step up to our Constitution or step out.
How can you help stop the brainwashing of children?Click, click, click! Please click on our ads and vote for RobertsCourt.com at all conspiracy sites. Help us advance the Mind Control lawsuit against wrongful government tyranny!
Much of American Mind Control is sex and fear based which can be treated and prevented by the traditional parental duty which is common in Europe and with our own "elite." But a brainwashing government does not want protected and enlightened children! Sex and fear programming goes to the very heart of "authority" programming for which your Nazified government does not want you to know about. After 60 years of Nazi Mind Control programming through mass media, most Americans are fully conditioned to accept these sex and terror devices as normal or necessary. It will program bureaucrats and children with emotional programming which fully Nazifies them with sex myths, taboos and terror bogey-men and this is a major source of wrongful power which must reside in deep darkness. The science which fully explains it as a secret government "crowd control" device has been fully repressed.
Gay Republicans of Bedford County, Pennsylvania promote the renovations of the historic Bedford Springs Hotel as the true Gay White House and Seat of Barbaric Justice. This historic location is slated to become the home of "Northern Decadence," a festival drawing on the enormous popularity of "Southern Decadence" before the ravages of hurricane Katrina in New Orleans. Now gays, lesbians, transvestites and transgendered "perverts" will enjoy an ideal location in the North, in Bedford, Pennsylvania.
This scenic, rural Pennsylvania location is home to President Buchanan's summer White House, where he entertained his gay friends in lavish festivals while the United States trembled angrily toward Civil War. As one of his gay lovers was a Southern slave owner, this relationship fueled a largely word-of-mouth conspiracy in the area of Bedford which quickly spread throughout the North. Known for its "medicinal" springs, Bedford Springs Hotel functioned as the private sexual spa for the Supreme Court itself during the 1850s, a unique distinction in the Court's history. It was here where the inhumane and barbaric "Dred Scott" decision was toasted over fine wine and caviar declaring that Blacks were property and not entrusted with Constitutional Rights. The anger over this injustice and destruction of Dred Scott's family led to the Civil War. In extreme irony, Queen Victoria, known for her extreme sexual repression, was the first state figure to telegraph our President while in his gay lair at Bedford Springs. He was reportedly naked at the time.
As a symbol of both racial and sexual discrimination in America, Bedford Springs is an historic location for building awareness of the continued prejudice in America that now destroys nearly 700,000 minority families annually through active government programs. Few Americans are aware of these highly duplicitous programs and how they actually work. After all, the very science that explains the duplicity of these programs are actively repressed through force and massive disinformation. This is not the case in post-Nazi Europe, where these devices of wholesale family destruction have been used before. But a simple analysis of modern American Justice and Child Trafficking services are fully exposed at RobertsCourt.comas we petition the Supreme Court of the United States to investigate just how this illegal and unconstitutional Child Trafficking actually works. This website is critical for anyone trying to understand how full-blown discrimination still functions in America in 2008 as racial and political "depopulation" programs by targeting children. These crimes against children are so heinous that they must be suspended in silence, darkness and complete ignorance, and this fraud against basic human rights has worked since the Civil War.
The "outed" politicians who have been disgraced for bad sexual behavior in Washington are laughing all the way to the bank. For their social programs which target children are now law, and they are enjoying the kickbacks from an illegal Child Trafficking industry that targets your children. This child trafficking is largely financed by programs coming down from the Bohemian Grove death cult. Our website is designed to investigate these illegal practices and petition our government for much needed investigations and reform.
Not only is Bedford historic for Civil War and Supreme Court history, it was home to significant Revolutions in opposition to tyranny including the first known attack on a British garrison in 1765, now Fort Bedford, by Colonial Rebels known as "The Black Boys." The town square hosted bizarre public executions, floggings and draconian punishments for trivial crimes. This masochistic tradition found its full expression in the Indian scalpings of settlers in the area, a horror introduced by the French during the French and Indian War.
Even today, this strangely repressed community actively promotes the Gay White House even as it destroys families in order to socially engineer fatherless children and traffic them for profit. This "peculiar institution" needs to be exposed through federal action. The children of "Liberals" and cultural minorities are targeted through employing the sexually repressed traditions and bigotries of far-right Republicans who manage progressive programs first designed to "help" poor children. Republicans now veto any health initiatives for children and attempt to dumb down our children through oppressive "protection" services. They now routinely employ basic hypnotic brainwashing techniques against mothers and small children first developed in Nazi Germany for the creation of slaves. They do so as top-down cyborgs fully programmed by the "science of demoralization" perfected by the Skull and Bones eugenicists. I propose that cyborgs are not full citizens, but only 3/5 a citizen, for cyborgs are unable to understand the Constitution of the United States.
Now children are routinely taught sexual fears and sexual amplification against their own parents which are exploited through police power and serve to provide the local governments with orphans for profit. View this family engineering and modern institutional sadism where a first-grader and her younger sisters were savagely exploited by an out-of-control Nanny-state agency. We appeal to the Supreme Court, Congress and International Courts for basic human rights and basic parental rights at: RobertsCourt.com
"On April 6, 1848, a slave named Dred Scott and his wife Harriet sued for their freedom in this Courthouse. The Scotts had been taken by their owner to free jurisdictions and then returned to Missouri, a slave state. In 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney of the U.S. Supreme Court (holding session at Bedford Springs Hotel) announced the decision in the case of Dred Scott v. Sanford. He stated that Americans of African ancestry were not eligible to be citizens based on the historical claim that they 'had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.' Taney's opinion also declared that Congress could not prevent the spread of slavery into the Western territories. This decision fueled sectional conflicts which led to the Civil War."
All of these efforts at Reverse Mind Control will be vehemently attacked in an attempt to discredit the obvious truth. The important thing to remember is that this truth movement is based upon fact and real science, not propaganda, superstition or CIA mind tricks! Our secret federal government has been highly active in changing our entire psychological community and our culture from a parent-based power structure to a government-based power structure of absolute deception. But all of this manipulation is based upon voodoo, witchcraft and propaganda, not reason or sound science. This most corrupt of administrations is advancing psychological attacks against the American people for which we are meant to believe no one, not even our family or friends. This divide and conquer propaganda will only increase dramatically in the coming months.
Americans must advance truth as our Founding Fathers prescribed based upon reason, fact and not emotion. Record these crimes and demand justice. This government is actively demonizing parents and true patriots through the witchcraft of Mind Control in order to replace them with the New World Order's version of the parent: The Sun King. But this Nazi Mind Control will be thoroughly exposed!
In a post-Orwellian age of absolute deception, nothing is more bizarre than the truth. You are being sexually assaulted by devices your conscious mind cannot detect in order to demoralize and destroy millions of American families. We are finding subliminal seduction effects throughout our "free" media and even during the 911 terror events. Exposing Mind Control in media will be the next frontier for freedom.
Fascism under the U.S. Constitution will be covert until that Constitution is irrelevant. The role of a fascist press will be to suspend the mind of the public away from the Constitution's destruction. Real Courts must address the real threat of a covert intrusion of subconscious propaganda into the American system, just as the study of subconscious political programming was necessary in the Cold War. Subconscious programming is the real threat to American children, as its machinations are so readily dismissed as only "theory." There is nothing theoretical about the tyranny and power of groupthink conformity under Mind Control.
The Nazi elite who actually financed and empowered Hitler are now in charge of your secret federal government and its many disinformation campaigns, including the war on "terror." Terror happens to be a prerequisite for all trauma-based Mind Control. They have successfully reversed our Constitution through Mind Control programming. Marionette programming now functions in "child services" organizations, as these marionettes are programmed to place your child in hypnotic suggestion, mine your child's mind for eroticistic exploitation. They will then eroticise your child's memories by turning normal and necessary events which were never traumatic to the child into "sexual" events which then become very traumatic for the child. They will then take your child as a result of their own trauma-making activities and make them mind-slaves for the Pentagon. This is the full power and horror of Nazi Mind Control being applied to millions of American children. You will not believe it, because you were programmed not to believe it. This is the "Sun King" trust programmed into you as the Constitution vanishes before your eyes.
The Republican Nazi elite have advanced "war logic" over our Constitution for generations. What is "war logic?" War logic is basic deception and duplicitous force used and advanced by many CIA "tricks." When the CIA operates a $200-$300 billion dollar/year drug trade around the world, they simultaneously flood powerful drugs into targeted ghettos and minority neighborhoods in America. This trick then requires a "war on drugs" to demonize and destroy countless minority families. This trick serves eugenics. When the government actively destroys the economy of these same locations, it stresses the population and creates crime. A "war on crime" is then employed to imprison massive minority populations and the populations of political non-conformists to this fraud. This war serves eugenics. When the secret federal government stages fake terror attacks on American citizens and builds broad conformity to these lies by keeping all evidence out of real courts and thoroughly manipulating the press, this allows this fraudulent government to kill millions of innocent people around the world, enrich its political supporters, demonize its political opponents and utterly destroy our Constitution. This "war on terror" serves eugenics.
What is recurrent in fascist movements throughout history is the sexual exploitation of the father and the dumbing-down of the parental duty. The fascists advance "sex investigations" against their political opponents in a broad effort to build sexual hysteria, sexual ignorance and sexual bigotry. This is perfectly logical, as the role of a good father is to protect his children from wrongful power manipulation, good fathers will become the targets of fascists. The more educated the father, the more "liberal" he will be presented to fascists and the most educated men will become the most demonized under fascism. This is precisely what we found under German and Italian fascists. Under fascism, children are actually educated in ways that require the sexual demonization of good fathers. This process builds the bigotries and sexual taboos resulting in a population hung-up on bizarre sexual issues. Driving the population like cattle serves this authoritarian elite. But sexual taboos become "controlling" taboos in the individual which will remain with a child for the rest of his or her life. Controlling taboos lead to many psychological problems including drug and alcohol abuse, sadistic behavior, bigotry, family dysfunction and numerous psychological problems relating to children who were not empowered about sex and power by their own parents. In fascism, this sadism is most apparent in the bureaucrats who are programmed to advance sexual repression.
These controlling taboos are obvious in communities where sexual repression is harshly imposed and is well known to authoritarian governments as they require them for controlling "non-elite" in their societies. Today, sexual repression is a profitable business where many rewards are tendered to those criminals who routinely destroy non-elite families. Sexual repression provides many "tricks" for the destruction of families on a massive scale. Nature has programmed fathers for sex education and other matters which are thoroughly demonized by Nazi movements in non-elite fathers. But these Nazi movements cannot be sustained under our Constitution, and they will attempt to utterly destroy this Constitution. Elite families are actively protected from these tricks of fascists. Central to the fascist state is the demand for soldiers and programmable bureaucrats and sexual repression is central to building the state "daddy" figure. We do not comply!
Understanding sexual repression and the resulting harmful taboos requires a sophistication and knowledge which can be actively removed from a culture. This sophistication was well known in colonial times in the elite and repressed in the slave. This basic control system has only changed by the "science" of advancing sexual repression and has been deliberately removed from much of the culture today. This censorship of information has been the precise role of the CIA in massive "truth" funding in the Psychological Industrial Complex over several decades. We see similar CIA-based censorship operations in the press, pharmacultural industry, banking industry and now the massive database, Internet industry. Critical to the mission of Pentagon Mind Control is the wrongful manipulation of authority from a parent-based system to a bureaucratic-based system. This manipulation was advanced as "altruistic" and "necessary" by the politicalization of many false wars based on lies. These are lies which an informed society will reject based on real science.
Sexual repression and imposed ignorance is central to indoctrinating children for fascism. The state suspends the children in ignorance and wrongful development so as to become the "daddy" figure for the child, serving to program that child for state domination. This is precisely what we find in the U.S. today, as the CIA has actively manipulated the attitudes and "science" concerning fatherhood over the past several decades. The media fully complies with this massive fraud, as they are also manipulated by the same taboos which demoralize millions of fathers. The demonization of the father occurs through both pseudo-sciences and omission of facts concerning normal child development. The magnetism necessary between father and child is demonized and portrayed as predatorial. No one does a better job of demonizing this most basic role of fatherhood than the pedophile who writes the "sex investigation" books and laws, which is precisely what we find behind our government today.
Marionettes are now fully programmed to take basic parental duties completely out of context and destroy millions of families. They are actively conditioned by powerful sexual taboos to believe that they are "saving" these children from sex predators. We are all conditioned to blame the individual and not the government. They then become outrageously sadistic, which is the hallmark of Nazi sexual repression. In short, these programmed marionettes turn innocent memories of childhood highly necessary for "elite" children into the horrific lie of child abuse in "non-elite" children which then cannot be questioned in any real court of law. This is how eugenics operates when it has been forced underground and "perfected" by Tavistock sex magic. Do you really believe that parents got together and demanded such a system from their Congress? This system was secretly applied to millions of "non-elite" families by top-down, elitist eugenics programs over many decades.
Active eugenics operations in America have been programmed by the CIA by manipulating the textbooks and the behaviorist "science" used by our social workers, police and media from which beamed down to us from the HYPe programming, Harvard, Yale, Princeton, paid for by massive U.S. taxpayer "truth" funding. But many of those "elite" at Harvard and elsewhere have always known that this imposed ignorance on non-elite families is a fraud. Children are not naturally meant to be raise sexually ignorant unless they are raised to become slaves. Sexual repression comes from the slave-making arts. This manipulation of "behavioral science" is directly linked to Richard Nixon's secret war on our minds, a war designed to program all of us for massive political manipulation. This secret war will expose the highly bizarre world of Nazi mind programming which now includes the rapid induction of hypnotic suggestion into our youngest of children. Such witchcraft is fully documented and includes instruction on using hypnotic devices against young children:
"The operator presses the right thumb and index finger against the vagus nerve and carotid artery on each side of the Adam's apple of the child, and pressure is exerted with both fingers of the operator. While the right hand is operating as described above, the left thumb and second finger are pressed firmly against the neck of the child just below each ear. This is also done to produce a slightly detached feeling. While these pressures are being applied, the operator then "pours on" the suggestions into the child's mind."
Lack of blood to the brain causes unconsciousness followed by a trance state. This is critically important information for parents whose children have been placed into the hypno-chambers of child services sex "validaters." This Nazi scam has been deliberately advanced in "sex investigation" manuals written by pedophiles for the CIA. If your child has been manipulated using these methods, it is critical that this evidence be recorded and reported as RICO lawsuits must be advanced against these conspirators. We need to sue the Bohemian Grove death cult which has targeted our children for absolute destruction. These are Nazi methods developed in Nazi death camps and have been secretly and deliberately "normalized" in America by our own CIA through MKULTRA Mind Control and massive "truth" funding.
Under today's Nazi family courts, you have no parental rights whatsoever. They are doing this to millions of "non-elite" families for the secret purpose of eugenics and producing "programmable" children for the Pentagon. Black families in America have been utterly devastated by these programs, as millions of other minority families are subject to these Kafkaesque horrors. Do you really believe that these Nazi methods will stop with minority families? They are manipulating the entire belief systems of children, parents and entire communities building a false religion on elitist behaviorist "science." This entire process is fully historical and direct parallels with Nazi Germany are now obvious. CIA efforts to advance broad sexual repression methods even apply to most news media which actively advance sexual horror stories with military precision, programming millions of families for sexual hysteria and destruction. This witchcraft will utterly destroy this nation one child at a time and it is totally obvious.
At the conclusion of World War Two, American investigators learned that Nazi doctors at the Dachau concentration camp in Germany had been conducting mind control experiments on inmates. They experimented with hypnosis and with the drug mescaline.
Mescaline is a quasi-synthetic extract of the peyote cactus, and is very similar to LSD in the hallucinations which it produces. Though they did not achieve the degree of success they had desired, the SS interrogators in conjunction with the Dachau doctors were able to extract the most intimate secrets from the prisoners when the inmates were given very high doses of mescaline.
There were fatal mind control experiments conducted at Auschwitz. The experiments there were described by one informant as "brainwashing with chemicals". The informant said the Gestapo wasn't satisfied with extracting information by torture. "So the next question was, why don't we do it like the Russians, who have been able to get confessions of guilt at their show trials?" They tried various barbiturates and morphine derivatives. After prisoners were fed a coffee-like substance, two of them died in the night and others died later.
The Dachau mescaline experiments were written up in a lengthy report issued by the U.S. Naval Technical Mission, whose job it was at the conclusion of the war to scour all of Europe for every shred of industrial and scientific material that had been produced by the Third Reich. It was as a result of this report that the U.S. Navy became interested in mescaline as an interrogation tool. The Navy initiated Project Chatter in 1947, the same year the Central Intelligence Agency was formed. The Chatter format included developing methods for acquiring information from people against their will, but without inflicting harm or pain.
At the conclusion of the war, the OSS was designated as the investigative unit for the International Military Tribunal, which was to become known as the Nuremberg Trials. The purpose of Nuremberg was to try the principal Nazi leaders. Some Nazis were on trial for their experiments, and the U.S. was using its own "truth drugs" on these principal Nazi prisoners, namely Goring, Ribbentrop, Speer and eight others. The Justice in charge of the tribunal had given the OSS permission to use the drugs.
The Dachau doctors who performed the mescaline experiments also were involved in aviation medicine. The aviation experiments at Dachau fasci- nated Heinrich Himmler. Himmler followed the progress of the tests, studied their findings and often suggested improvements. The Germans had a keen interest in several medical problems in the field of flying, they were interested in preventing pilots from slowly becoming unconscious as a result of breathing the thin air of the high altitudes and there was interest in enhancing night vision.
The main research in this area was at the Institute of Aviation in Munich, which had excellent laboratories. The experiments in relationship to the Institute were conducted at Dachau. Inmates had been immersed in tubs of ice water with instruments placed in their orifices in order to monitor their painful deaths. Dr. Hubertus Strughold, who ran the German aviation medicine team, confirmed that he had heard humans were used for the Dachau experiments. Hidden in a cave in Hallein were files recording the Dachau experiments.
On May 15, 1941, Dr. Sigmund Rascher wrote a letter to Himmler requesting permission to use the Dachau inmates for experiments on the physiology of high altitudes. Rascher lamented the fact that no such experiments have been done using human subjects. "The experiments are very dangerous and we cannot attract volunteers," he told Himmler. His request was approved.
Dachau was filled with Communists and Social Democrats, Jews, Jehovah's Witnesses, Gypsies, [Protestant] clergymen, homosexuals, and people critical of the Nazi government. Upon entering Dachau, prisoners lost all legal status, their hair was shaved off, all their possessions confis- cated, they were poorly fed, and they were used as slaves for both the corporations and the government. The SS guards were brutal and sadistic. The idea to test subjects at Dachau was really the brain child of Erich Hippke, chief surgeon of the Luftwaffe.
Between March and August of 1942 extensive experiments were conducted at Dachau regarding the limits of human endurance at high altitudes. These experiments were conducted for the benefit of the German Air Force. The experiments took place in a low-pressure chamber in which altitudes of up to 68,000 feet could be simulated. The subjects were placed in the chamber and the altitude was raised, many inmates died as a result. The survivors often suffered serious injury. One witness at the Nuremberg trails, Anton Pacholegg, who was sent to Dachau in 1942, gave an eye- witness account of the typical pressure test:
"The Luftwaffe delivered a cabinet constructed of wood and metal. It was possible in the cabinet to either decrease or increase the air pressure. You could observe through a little window the reaction of the subject inside the chamber. The purpose of these experiments was to test human energy and the subject's capacity...to take large amounts of pure oxygen, and then to test his reaction to a gradual decrease in oxygen. I have personally seen through the observation window of the chamber when a prisoner inside would stand a vacuum until his lungs ruptured. Some experiments gave men such pressure in their heads that they would go mad and pull out their hair in an effort to relieve the pressure. They would tear their heads and face with their fingers and nails in an attempt to maim themselves in their madness. They would beat the walls with their hands and head and scream in an effort to relieve pressure in their eardrums. These cases of extreme vacuums generally ended in the death of the subjects." The former prisoner also testified, "An extreme experiment was so certain to result in death that in many instances the chamber was used for routine execution purposes rather than an experi- ment." A minimum 200 prisoners were known to have died in these experiments.
The doctors directly involved with the research held very high positions: Karl Brandt was Hitler's personal doctor; Oskar Schroeder was the Chief of the Medical Services of the Luftwaffe; Karl Gebhardt was Chief Surgeon on the Staff of the Reich Physician SS and Police and German Red Cross President; Joachim Mrugowsky was Chief of the Hygienic Institute of the Waffen SS; Helmut Poppendick was a senior colonel in the SS and Chief of the Personal Staff of the Reich Physicians SS and Police; Siegfried Ruff was Director of the Department of Aviation Medicine.
The first human guinea pig was a 37 year old Jew in good health. Him- mler invited 40 top Luftwaffe officers to view a movie of an inmate dying in the pressure chamber. After the pressure chamber tests, the cold treatment experi- ments began. The experiments consisted of immersing inmates in freezing water while their vital signs were monitored. The goal was to discover the cause of death. Heart failure was the answer. An inmate described the procedures:
"The basins were filled with water and ice was added until the water measured 37.4 F and the experimental subjects were either dressed in a flying suit or were placed in the water naked. The temperature was measured rectally and through the stomach. The lowering of the body temperature to 32 degrees was terrible for experimental subjects. At 32 degrees the subject lost conscious- ness. They were frozen to 25 degrees. The worst experiment was performed on two Russian officer POWs. They were placed in the basin naked. Hour after hour passed, and while usually after a short time, 60 minutes, freezing had set in, these two Russians were still conscious after two hours. After the third hour one Russian told the other, 'Comrade, tell that officer to shoot us.' The other replied, 'Don't expect any mercy from this Fascist dog.' Then they shook hands and said goodbye. The experiment lasted at least five hours until death occurred.
Dry freezing experiments were also carried out a Dachau. One subject was put outdoors on a stretcher at night when it was extremely cold. While covered with a linen sheet, a bucket of cold water was poured over him every hour. He was kept outdoors undersub-freezing conditions. In subsequent experiments, subjects were simply left outside naked in a court under freez- ing conditions for hours. Himmler gave permission to move the experiments to Auschwitz, because it was more private and because the subjects of the experiment would howl all night as they froze. The physical pain of freezing was terrible. The subjects died by inches, heartbeat became totally irregular, breathing difficulties and lung endema resulted, hands and feet became frozen white."
As the Germans began to lose the war, the aviation doctors began too keep their names from appearing in Himmler's files for fear of future recriminations.
The Nazi doctors who experimented on the inmates of prison camps during World War Two were tried for murder at the Nuremberg Tribunal. The accused were educated, trained physicians, they did not kill in anger or in malice, they were creating a science of death.
Ironically, in 1933, the Nazi's passed a law for the protection of animals. The law cited the prevention of cruelty and indifference to animals as one of the highest moral values of a people, animal experimentation was unthinkable, but human experimentation's were acceptable. The victims of the crime of these doctors numbered into the thousands.
In 1953, while the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY was still con- ducting mind control and behavior modification on unwitting humans in this country, the United States signed the Nuremberg Code, a code born out of the ashes of war and human suffering. The document was a solemn promise never to tolerate such human atrocities again. The Code maintains three fundamental principles:
* The subjects of any experimentation must be volunteers who thoroughly understand the purpose and the dangers of the experiments. They must be free to give consent and the consent must be without pressure and they must be free to quit the experiments at any time.
(In regards to the Nazi-based CIA experiments, MK-ULTRA and the mind-control projects which followed, the CIA has failed in all three of these areas. - Wol.) * The experiments must be likely to yield knowledge which is valuable to everyone. The knowledge must be such that it could not be gained in any other way.
* The experiments must be conducted by only the most competent doctors, and they must exercise extreme care.
The Nazi aviation experiments met none of these conditions. Most inmates at Dachau knew that the experiments in the pressure chamber were fatal. From the very beginning, control of the experiments was largely in the hands of the SS, which was later judged to be a criminal organization by the Nuremberg Tribunal.
Despite our lessons from Nuremberg and the death camps, the CIA, U.S. Navy and the U.S. Army Chemical Corps targeted specific groups of people for experimentation who were not able to resist, prisoners, mental patients, foreigners, ethnic minorities, sex deviants, the terminally ill, children and U.S. military personnel and prisoners of war. They VIOLATED the Nurem- berg Code for conducting and subsidizing experiments on unwitting citizens. The CIA began its mind control projects in 1953, the very year that the U.S. signed the Nuremberg Code and pledged with the international community of nations to respect basic human rights and to prohibit experimentation on captive populations without full and free consent.
Dr. Cameron, a CIA operative, was one of the worst offenders against the Code, yet he was a member of the Nuremberg Tribunal, with full knowledge of its testimony. In 1973, a three judge court in Michigan ruled, "...experimental psychosurgery, which is irreversible and intrusive, often leads to the blunting of emotions, the deadening of memory, the reduction of affect, and limits the ability to generate new ideas. Its potential for injury to the creativity of the individual is great and can infringe on the right of the individual to be free from interference with his mental process.
"The state's interest in performing psychosurgery and the legal ability of the involuntarily detained mental patient to give consent, must bow to the First Amendment, which protects the generation and free flow of ideas from unwarranted interference with one's mental processes." Citing the Nuremberg Code, the court found that "the very nature of the subject's incarceration dimini- shes the capacity to consent to psychosurgery." In 1973, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts enacted regulations which would require informed written consent from voluntary patients before electroshock treatment could be per- formed.
Senator Sam Ervin's Committee lashed out bitterly at the mind control and behavior modification experiments and ordered them discontinued, they WERE NOT. But the New England Journal of Medicine states, that the consent provisions are "no more than an elaborate ritual." They called it "a device that when the subject is uneducated and uncomprehending, confers no more than a semblance of propriety on human experimentation."
The Nuremberg Tribunal brought to light that some of the most respected figures in the medical profession were involved in the vast crime network of the SS. ONLY 23 persons were charged with criminal activity in this area, despite the fact that hundreds of medical personnel were involved. The defendants were charged with crimes against humanity. They were found guilty of planning and executing experiments on humans without their consent, in a cruel and brutal manner which involved severe torture, deliberate murder and with the full knowledge of the gravity of their deeds. ONLY seven of the defendants were sentenced to death and hanged, others received life sen- tences. Five who were involved in the experiments were not tried. Ernest Grawitz committed suicide, Carl Clauberg was tried in the Soviet Union, Josef Mengele escaped to South America and was later captured by Israeli agents, Horst Schumann disappeared and Siegmund Rascher was executed by Himmler.
There were 200 German medical doctors conducting these medical experiments. Most of these doctors were friends of the United States [medical establishment] before the war, and despite their inhuman experiments, the U.S. attempted to rebuild a relationship with them after the war. The know- ledge the Germans had accumulated at the expense of human life and suffering, was considered a "booty of war", by the Americans and the Russians.The 'Americans' tracked down Dr. Strughold, the aviation doctor who was in charge of the Dachau experiments. With full knowledge that the experiments were conducted on captive humans, the U.S. recruited the doctors to work for them. General Dwight D. Eisenhower (whose presidency was sponsored and financially backed by the Rockefellers. - Wol.) gave his personal approval to exploit the work and research of the Nazi's in the death camps.
Within weeks of Eisenhower's order, many of these notorious doctors were working for the U.S. Army at Heidelberg. Army teams scoured Europe for scientific experimental apparatus such as pressure chambers, compressors, G-force machines, giant centrifuges, and electron microscopes. These doctors were wined and dined by the U.S. Army while most of Germany's post-war citizens virtually starved.
The German doctors were brought to the U.S. and went to work for Project Paperclip. ALL these doctors had been insulated against war crime charges. The Nuremberg prosecutors were SHOCKED that 'U.S. authorities' were using the German doctors despite their criminal past.
Under the leadership of Strughold, 34 scientists accepted contracts from Project Paperclip, and were moved to Randolph Air Force Base at San Antonio, Texas. The authorization to hire these Nazi scientists came directly for the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The top military brass stated that they wished to exploit these rare minds. Project Paperclip, ironically, would use Nazi doctors to develop methods of interrogating German prisoners of war.
As hostilities began to build after the war between the Americans and the Russians, the U.S. imported as many as 1000 former Nazi scientists.
(In their over-confidence, the 'government' officials assumed that these 'scientists' would immediately give up their Nazi belief system and convert to the Constitu- tional ideology. Those government officials involved -- excepting for the Project Paperclip personnel, Nazi fifth columnists and double agents working within the American government with the Rockefellers and other American Nazis -- must have assumed that with the Neuremberg trials and de-Nazification operations of Europe, the entire Nazi network had been extinguished, and therefore there was no danger of these 1000 plus Nazi scientists collaborating with a secret Nazi underground which intended to carry through on Adolph Hitler's plans in spite of their apparent 'defeat' in Europe. - Wol.) In 1969, Americans landed on the moon, and two groups of scientist in the control center shared the credit, the rocket team from Peenemunde, Germany, under the leadership of Werner von Braun, these men had perfected the V-2s which were built in the Nordhausen caves where 20,000 slave laborers from prison camp Dora had been worked to death. The second group were the space doctors, lead by 71-year-old Dr. Hubertus Strughold, whose work was pioneered in Experimental Block No. 5 of the Dachau concentration camp and the torture and death of hundreds of inmates. The torture chambers that was used to slowly kill the prisoners of the Nazi's were the test beds for the apparatus that protected Neil Armstrong from harm, from lack of oxygen, and pressure, when he walked on the moon.
BIBLIOGRAPHY: The Napa Sentinel would like to acknowledge the exceptional contribution of radio commentator David Emory and his extensive archives. Other source material included:
Acid Dreams by Martin Lee & Bruce Shlain
From the Belly of the Beast, Jack Henry Abbott
Congressional Record, No. 26, Vol. 118, Feb. 24, 1974, testimony of Jose Delgado
The Glass House Tapes, by Louis Tackwood
The Great Heroin Coup, by Henrik Kruger
Individual Rights and the Federal Role in Behavior Modification, 93rd Congress, 2nd Session, 1974. Sam Ervin Senate Subcommittee on Constitutional 'Rights
The Last Hero, Wild Bill Donovan, by Anthony Cave Brown
Mind Control, by Peter Schrag
The Mind Stealers, by Samuel Chavkin
Matador with a radio stops wild bull, New York Times, May 17, 1965
Operation Mind Control, Water Bowart
The Phoenix Program, Douglas Valentine
The Physical Control of the Mind, Jose M. R. Delgado, MD
The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia, Alfred McCoy
Role of Brain Disease in Riots and urban Violence, by Vernon H. Mark, Frank R. Ervin, and William H. Sweet. Journal of the American Medical Association, September 11, 1967.
San Francisco Bay Guardian, August 28, 1991
Convict Talks of 1984 Arms Talks With Iran, San Francisco Chronicle, December 29, 1986
San Francisco Chronicle, January 13, 1973
Guy Wright Column, San Francisco Chronicle, July 5, 1987
Sunday Times, July 1975.
Violence and the Brain, by Vernon H. Mark and Frank R. Ervin
War on the Mind: The Military Uses and Abuses of Psychology, by Peter Watson
Were We Controlled? - by Lincoln Lawrence
Why Was Patricia Hearst Kidnapped? - by Mae Brussell, The Realist.
and other select readings.
* * * * * * * From: [email protected] (Zodiac) Newsgroups: alt.politics.org.cia,alt.activism,alt.drugs,alt.conspiracy Subject: LSD, the CIA, and Your Brain Message-ID: <[email protected]> Date: 21 Jan 94 13:40:55 GMT [The following is from an extensive 80 plus KB file. Although most of the file deals with CIA mind control research and one could reason that 'NAZI' and 'CIA' are synonymous, I've cited only those passages dealing directly 'NAZI' mind control experimentation. - Wol.] ...The navy became interested in mescaline as an interrogation agent when American investigators learned of mind control experiments carried out by Nazi doctors at the Dachau concentration camp during World War II. After administering the hallucinogen to 30 prisoners, the Nazis con- cluded that it was "impossible to impose one's will on another person as in hypnosis even when the strongest dose of mescaline had been given." (Note: The danger in hypnosis is that it can -- through the power of suggestion -- induce an alternate perspective on reality, and a person's mind could be programmed in such a way that the programming process itself is forgotten. Therefore a person could be programmed to believe for example that they are having a bad 'nightmare' and that the one causing the nightmare is an evil monster who must be killed 'in the dream'. Drug-induced hypnosis can confuse a person's perceptions of the lines between reality and unreality, and 'voices' giving instructions could be interpreted to be of their own creation or from a supernatural 'source' when in fact the instructions are hypnotically-induced. So then, even though the 'will' remains intact, the individual could be moved to commit atrocities which they would not normally commit whether because the scenario is made out to be a 'dream' or whether they are programmed to see the 'target' as an evil monster who must be van- quished in order to save the country, the world, and so on. People's choices are highly dependent on their perception or context of reality. If the true reality context is altered to a false reality context, such as described above, they could be moved to commit atrocities that they normally would not commit in a state of normal lucidity, such as assas- sination, etc. - Wol). But the drug still afforded certain advantages to SS interrogators, who were consistently able to draw "even the most intimate secrets from the [subject] when questions where cleverly put." Not surprisingly, "sentiments of hatred and revenge were exposed in every case." The mescaline experiments at Dachau were described in a lengthy report by the US Naval Technical Mission, which swept across Europe in search of every scrap of industrial material and scientific data that could be garnered from the fallen Reich. This mission set the stage for the whole- sale importation of more than 600 top Nazi scientists under the auspices of Project Paperclip -- which THE CIA SUPERVISED during the early years of the Cold War. Among those who emigrated to the US in such a fashion was Dr Hubertus Strughold, the German scientist whose chief subordinates (Dr Sigmund Ruff and Dr Sigmund Rascher) were directly involved in "aviation medicine" experiments at Dachau, which included the mescaline studies. Despite recurring allegations that he sanctioned medical atrocities during the war, Strughold settled in Texas and became an important figure in America's space program. After Werner von Braun, he was the top Nazi scientist employed by the American government, and he was subsequently hailed by NASA as the "father of space medi- cine"... Like the Nazi doctors at Dachau, the CIA victimized certain groups of people, who were unable to resist: prisoners, mental patients, foreigners, the terminally ill, sexual deviants, ethnic minorities...
Both the government and the mainstream media have since tried to portray the 9/11 truth movement as led by people who can be dismissed as 'conspiracy theorists' able to find an outlet for their ideas only on the Internet. Books now available, with essays by intellectuals from Europe and North America, show this caricature to be untrue. Coming from different intellectual disciplines as well as from different parts of the world, these authors are united in the conviction that the official story about 9/11 is a huge deception manufactured to extend imperial control at home and abroad. See the PeaceProject.com Website for top publications.
When my own family was attacked by those bent on preserving the "innocence" of my children, I began this blog to expose the myths about American Mind Control. Most of Mind Control manipulation requires the destruction of what Freud called the "reality principle" at childhood. This destruction robs children of sex and fear empowerment by real parents and sets them up for full sex and fear manipulation for the rest of their lives.
The first mission of secret government Mind Control is to make its machinations invisible to the minds of the controlled. This process begins at childhood. As Mind Control is apparent to those travelling from another country, the country of the blind is the cradle-to-grave programming of intellectual blindness which is deliberately programmed into the entire culture at childhood. Children who are denied comprehensive sex education, for example, are much more likely to fall for the wrongful indoctrination of authoritarian power systems which replace the parent's authority with the government's. Such programming becomes obvious to those who would travel to North Korea, yet few want to understand how American brainwashing follows a similar path of top-down authority. Even as Freud exposed many of these secrets, most Americans are fully unaware of the indoctrination of their own children into a government mythic system.
What is top-down authority?
Top-down authority in North Korea is the full sublimation of the citizen into a pyramid power structure which has the dictator at the top. Top-down authority instills a reverence for the dictator as a kind of god figure. American top-down authority is more problematic, as the Constitution was construed as a bottom-up power structure. Therefore, the "Illuminati" was developed along the lines of European royalty, where the cult of personality was built through the arts and not through laws. The arts, such as Shakespeare, placed royalty on a lofty plane of existence by programming plays to elevate the status and authority of royalty. The plays of Elizabethan England, then, spread the emotional contagion throughout the land via staged productions. This contagion functioned as Alpha-level programming in the "sacred" areas of the mind, much as religions spread emotional contagion in regard to the "sacred." The "demonic" is similarly created by this process. The intellectual blindness which formed in Elizabethan England was for the perception of royalty as merely human. The elevation of royalty on the Shakespearean stage served to elevate royalty in real life, thus functioning as a powerful form of brainwashing.
The power to build a broad mythic system in a culture through Alpha-level programming is the power to brainwash the people.
The brainwashing of elevated royalty in Britain was an established policy for hundreds of years. In contrast, the French were not employing the arts for brainwashing purposes and the French Revolution removed its royalty from power.
Brainwashing in America.
America's top-down personality cult is the Illuminati. When so much power is given to a few key assets at the top, the CIA can easily control events like 9/11 from the top down by controlling a few key elements of theatre.
Cathy O'Brien is now one of thousands of brave Americans speaking out about Nazi Mind Control used in America.
Cathy O'Brien, a federal whistle-blower and survivor of Monarch Programming, testified before the U.S. Congress that sex education in the home is the only known method that would help protect our children from this massive silent killer. She was made a sex mule by our own government through active programs designed to keep children ignorant, keep us all ignorant! But for completely smug political reasons, Republicans have savagely advanced the opposite position of criminalizing parents and presenting themselves as "child advocate heroes." Because our government has imposed this programming onto literally millions of Americans, political agents are using this as a reason to build hysteria, while they simultaneously destroy millions of lives. It is now absolutely imperative that parents be given the rights already invested in them by the Supreme Court to protect their children from wrongful government programs.
True protection of children can be made to mimic criminal activity by wrongful authorities, but this education is anything but criminal. Wrongful authority has an agenda which advances the polar opposite of good parenting. In an age of complete mind control and Orwellian deceit, good parents must educate their children in complete secrecy as has been necessary for centuries under tyrants. In order to protect your children from active Monarch-programmed predators, active CIA sex-mule programs and the killer programming of the Pentagon, good parents must use effective sex education as developed at Harvard and used around the world! Parents must fundamentally question their own government. Parents are no longer falling for this outrageous fraud against our families in the name of "patriotism."
Though hysteria in children is today quite common, many adults are unaware that this hysteria is increasing and indicates a much deeper and disturbing side to active conditioning methods now being used against Americans. Sexual hysteria cases dramatically increase when and where Republican power rules supreme. You will find many Republican candidates advancing "get tough" talk against horrendous "sex crimes." They will not tell you that secret government actively advances these fears. This psychological warfare against Americans serves a profoundly unconstitutional political mission and builds "heat" under millions of U.S. families serving to break them up. Children from broken homes are most at risk, because authoritarian governments forced to function in a pluralistic society actively promote broken homes! Even though families are advanced politically as the Holy Grail, this propaganda is meaningless when it is only applied to the political elite. There is an actual link between fatherless children and our many wars. Fatherless children become "programmable" children required by the Pentagon. These children then do not question the "military value" of fatherlessness. Fatherlessness becomes the norm under total domination of "family values" Republicans.
These programs were introduced as "altruistic" programs so that broad segments of the population would be conditioned to never question them. They therefore function underground. In the 1980s we saw a dramatic rise in childhood hyper-abuse hysteria cases largely coming from these programs being advanced by the Reagan administration. Many "intellectuals," writers and scientists at Harvard tried to warn the public of the ultimate progression of these programs. Very few Americans believed us! Now, through pure judicial fraud, political agents are permitted to advance leading hypnotic mind control methods against small children through illegal and underground courts and political inquisitions--absolutely none of which are recognized by our Constitution. Adults today are equally hysterical about the mind control methods developed for the military that are now used routinely by local and state governments. Protecting your children from these programs is now treated as a crime. These Orwellian devices are not illusions and they are not isolated.
These programs were literally taken from Nazi Germany and their ultimate goal is universal mind control, population control and sustained political power by a very small elite. No one in his right mind would allow our government to get away with this, so literally everyone must be given a wrong mind. We now have very sophisticated methods to prove to you that even you may be infected by the Monarch Worm.
We are documenting many cases where these unethical methods are routinely used against children in order to build hysteria itself, a powerful conditioning agent. These conditioning methods are extremely advanced for political indoctrination even though they are totally unconstitutional as such. These methods are so advanced, that these agents will defend these methods with their lives, most Americans will follow suit "as patriots," even though these mind control devices are purely political, certainly not Constitutional! Study these programs in post-Katrina New Orleans to find how active eugenics programs work and all other departments of government do not work. Eugenics is the true purpose of these bureaucracies.
By denying this parental duty everywhere in our society and inflicting real trauma onto children, Republicans have crossed a line they will truly regret. They are now able to indoctrinate children with lies and even traffic in them as de facto slaves. 3,000 children a week are being trafficked away from their biological parents, largely "liberal" parents are having their children forcibly adopted by Republican parents. These methods are so criminal, political and obvious that any first-year law student can prosecute them effectively. But what any first-year law student will soon find out, these bureaucrats and "citizens" have been so thoroughly conditioned into total conformity and banality, that they literally must be awakened to the real world. What was once used only covertly by our CIA in overseas operations, are now fully documented in college textbooks for police and social workers. Very few people see the direct relationship and the "blending" of politics, "science" and "patriotism."
As our ruling elite burn effigies of children in celebration to the pagan god Mo-loch, they become powerful through the Satanic arrogance of the slave-maker. As much of this power only resides at the subconscious level, you may be consciously unaware of it. This programming is everywhere in your popular media and it all traces back to the power elite at the Bohemian Grove. But millions of Americans are now aware of this massive fraud on the subconscious level. MKULTRA Victim Testimony: Satanic Arrogance is "Sex Magic" and is not "Science"
Such child sex slaves are programmed at the Beta level through indescribable torture, yet few Americans understand that most child sex slaves are programmed at the Alpha level of Mind Control. The active destruction of the parental duty of normal and necessary sex education at childhood by real parents sets children up for full media programming, broad alienation and produces more eugenics results than Hitler could have dreamed possible. Through sex taboo programming and government terror operations, such empowerment of children by real parents can be effectively destroyed in nearly the entire population. Today, only a few Illuminati centers such as Harvard educate the ruling elite from around the world on the true power and purpose of sexual repression at childhood. It originates with the slave-making arts and over hundreds of years of slave-making, it has been fully normalized as a good thing in many Western cultures. Such repression is the slave-maker's method of transferring authority from the parent to the slave-maker which sets children up for brainwashing or core political programming. Freud fully exposed this scam of the elite and was brought into Tavistock, a British intelligence organization. Through "national security" agendas, such a secret to absolute power is kept from the over-whelming majority of Americans today, so that they are raising their own children as mind-slaves.
To understand this brainwashing, imagine that you are a child who reads Superman comic books over and over again. Such a child is highly suggestible. Therefore, your own Congress knows the power of Superman and controls how Superman is themed. This is a Superman who is being programmed into the child as a "parental" figure, and for Jungian psychologists, this Superman is being programmed as an archetype of the federal government itself. For when the child is mature, Superman will be fully programmed in the same region of the mind where the federal government and government agents are also programmed. This entire process of deep programming "blends" a secret federal agenda with the fictional character of Superman and sets up Superman as the perfect Machiavellian manipulator, as his doing any wrong will not be believed by the child. The child will simply be intellectually blind to any atrocity done by Superman or, by deep programming, the federal agent.
Under Operation Mockingbird, your "news" personalities are nothing more than top-down programmed cyborgs. Yet, over 80% of Americans get their core political "reality" from this controlled media. The power of groupthink conformity allows for the "big lie" for which peer pressure alone creates a broad mythic system of absolute deception.
These media mesmerists are not true journalists. Since they are controlled by the CIA, they can then advance a totalitarian mythic system which has tremendous power to fully Nazify the population for "endless war," all based on false-flag terror attacks and media "parental" programming. Under groupthink conformity, the bigger the lie, the more people believe. This fatal flaw of the human mind is never exposed to the American people because it is used as a major "asset" of the CIA. Groupthink conformity is so powerful that few will even study its power over the American people. Cyborgs are chosen for their "parental" qualities so that lies are more easily programmed. This is due to the fact that real parents in America are destroyed by the millions. This destruction of real parents transfers power from the parent to the top-down cyborgs. The many Illuminati top-down power cults all serve the Bohemian Grove death cult. Secret top-down power that forms the same kind of power pyramid found in North Korea.
When World War II ended in 1945, six million European Jews were dead, killed in the Holocaust. More than one million of the victims were children. There was an enormous population of "hidden children" stolen from their parents through pure programmed bigotry, false courts and mob violence. Nazis would inflict hysteria onto children then upcode these cases to police who would routinely use the hysteria as grounds to traffic in the children. Such children today are everywhere in America and the same forces of child abuse and trafficking are obvious in America. False drama paid for through programs like CAPTA destroy countless families in Kafkaesque inquisitions. If you do not wake up to this horrific fact, you are among the most dumbed-down, mind-controlled population on earth.
Driven by a racist ideology that viewed Jews as “parasitic vermin” worthy only of eradication, the Nazis implemented genocide on an unprecedented scale. All of Europe's Jews were slated for destruction: the sick and the healthy, the rich and the poor, the religiously orthodox and converts to Christianity, the aged and the young, even infants. Today, the vast population of non-elites are slated to enter into the singularity of absolute Mind Control through very seductive technology where they will fully trust their "parental" government. All such trust will lure them into absolute deception, as only a parent can ground children in the real truth.
Thousands of Jewish children survived this brutal carnage, however, many because they were hidden. With identities disguised, and often physically concealed from the outside world, these youngsters faced constant fear, dilemmas, and danger. Theirs was a life in shadows, where a careless remark, a denunciation, or the murmurings of inquisitive neighbors could lead to discovery and death. Today, the children of those parents who truly understand Mind Control and its real threat to children are being treated in the same horrific manner. This is because Nazi Mind Control is very active in America.
Please help us promote awareness of the psychology and constitutional violations behind the Nazification of American children. The Nazification of American children now functions through a mythic system of wrongful government which actively employs Nazi Mind Control brought to the U.S. in the 1950s. You can research all the mass media "entertainment" and "news" that has been thoroughly themed to present government as "competent," "sexy" and "parental." This brainwashing simultaneously demonizes the average individual, over and over again. This brainwashing serves the real government to do the opposite and get away with it. Government's true face becomes the Machiavellian manipulator. Learn the truth.
Image that you had the power to secretly control the theming of media and news since the early 1950s when our own Congress found Alpha-level Mind Control to be a very serious issue coming from the Soviets. Imagine also that you were a bird lover. As a bird lover with enormous media power, you might insist that "news" stories be presented about birds which flew into windows and died. Such stories, you would insist, are emotional and deeply important. These stories, played literally over and over and over again for generations would serve a profoundly powerful effect of "theatre is a hammer." Over generations, you would find the total elimination of windows on all U.S. buildings! This emotional programming would transform society. In fact, this may appear amazing or incredible to you, but such power of the media and theatre is well known to your secret federal government. It has been programming you with this very same emotional programming. Theatre is indeed a hammer.
Our garbage-variety media is fully themed by the CIA for demoralization of the American non-elite population. The attack on the individual through blistering repetition builds a demonization process deep within the subconscious mind which fully serves wrongful government. Through powerful subconscious programming, this demonization of the individual then becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. What is even more disturbing, Mockingbird media takes what is great about American culture and employs it for absolute top-down deception.
Operation MOCKINGBIRD - The CIA begins recruiting American news organizations and journalists to become spies and disseminators of propaganda. The effort is headed by Frank Wisner, Allan Dulles, Richard Helms and Philip Graham. Graham is publisher of The Washington Post, which becomes a major CIA player. Eventually, the CIA’s media assets will include ABC, NBC, CBS, Time, Newsweek, Associated Press, United Press International, Reuters, Hearst Newspapers, Scripps-Howard, Copley News Service and more. By the CIA’s own admission, at least 25 organizations and 400 journalists will become CIA assets manipulating news, movies, music, radio and television. In 1976, CIA Director George H. W. Bush tried to whitewash MOCKINGBIRD as a non-issue. But who is better positioned by the vast military industrial complex than he to contain such an overwhelming abuse of the Constitution?
Prescott Bush, father to George I, helped to finance Hitler, was instrumental in bringing Nazi MC technology to the CIA and was a director of CBS when the FDR government "requested" GE and Westinghouse /CBS partner to form RCA and "protect" the American airways from enemy propaganda. Formed by GE and Westinghouse to promote government propaganda, they are still on the job of waving flags and spinning facts to support wars and omit anti corporate "news" as NBC and CBS. Now these efforts are fully buttressed by Fox and CNN. While Fox is bringing "conservatives" in line, CNN is bringing "liberals" in line, all of which serves to mask the real power system. By advancing himself as a "conservative," George H. W. Bush then could distance himself from more "liberal" media outlets through effective MC serving the illusion of political conflict. He then miraculously maintains near total federal authority by blood or by proxy since the Kennedy assassination. How does a Constitution designed to churn federal powers every four years sustain such near-absolute authority over 7 decades?
Groupthink conformity through mass-media dominance is so powerful, that only the exceptional patriot will understand this power. Through deep programming, this power of full manipulation becomes invisible to the rational mind. Its power over the Constitution is nearly absolute.
George Herbert Walker and Prescott Bush were active in the leadership of the eugenics societies that were popular among the wealthy classes in the first half of the twentieth century. Prescott Bush was the Connecticut director of the Mental Hygiene Society which originated at Yale University in 1908. The headquarters of the American Eugenics Society was also at Yale (also home of the Order of Skull & Bones) until its relocation to and merger in 1952 with the Population Council, which was founded by John D. Rockefeller and John Foster Dulles, lawyer for Brown Brothers Harriman.
The Mental Hygiene Society of which Prescott Bush was a director was a project of the Order of Skull and Bones. The society "would evolve into the CIA's cultural engineering effort of the 1950s, the drugs and brainwashing adventure known as 'MK-Ultra'...an anti-American project which poured drugs into the country and worked to fabricate the drug-sex youth culture." What they won't tell you is that "Mental Hygiene" is really a culling device where science can be used to advance double-standards, one for the elite and one for the non-elite. "Mental Hygiene" now includes decades of deep programming of sex taboos, violence programming and terror programming which serves eugenics and the Pentagon. The Nazification of American children is directly linked to common Alpha-level programming which is obvious in American media and to 600 Nazi Mind Control operatives developing these devices in complete obscurity. In very subtle and sophisticated ways, the sleight of hand can be employed by bureaucrats to control the reproduction freedom of minorities on a very broad scale.
Behind the Tavistock Institute and its brainchild, MK-Ultra, was the largesse of the Rockefeller Foundation, "a global instrument for radical social change, using American money and British strategy." British psychiatry: from eugenics to assassination by Anton Chaitkin reveals John D. Rockefeller's interest in psychiatric genetics, which "applied to psychiatry the concepts of eugenics (otherwise known as race purification, race hygiene, or race betterment) developed in London's Galton Laboratory and its offshoot Eugenics Societies in England and America." Besides Rockefeller and the British Crown, the families of Warburg and Harriman were the primary funders of eugenics internationally.
"A behavior control research project was begun in the 1950s, coordinated by the British psychological warfare unit called the Tavistock Institute, with the Scottish Rite Masons, the Central Intelligence Agency, and other British, U.S., Canadian, and United Nations agencies. The project became famous in the 1970s under a CIA code name, 'MK-Ultra.' Its notoriety for brainwashing by drugs, hypnosis, electroshock, and other tortures caused many books to be written about the project, and the U.S. Senate conducted hearings which exposed many of its abusive features. President Gerald Ford appointed a commission headed by Vice President Nelson Rockefeller, to correct the CIA's misconduct. There was a widespread anti-establishment view at the time, that here was the fox appointed to guard the hen house."
The CIA-press connection traces its roots back to the early days of the Cold War, when Allen Dulles (who became CIA director in 1953) began courting the nation's most prestigious journalistic institutions for Agency operations. The mood of the day precluded the need for secretive infiltration, as Carl Bernstein points out in his 1977 expose on the topic. "American publishers, like so many other corporate and institutional leaders at the time, were willing to commit the resources of their companies to the struggle against global Communism," he writes. "Accordingly, the line separating the American press corps was often indistinguishable."
That's not to say that reporters acted as spies in the James Bond sense. Media outlets offered services that fell into the broad categories of providing "cover" for CIA operatives (i.e. jobs and credentials) or sharing information gathered by reporters on staff.
While the Agency ran a formal training program in the 50's that attempted to teach rank-and-file agents to be reporters, this was among the least common of the more than 400 relationships with the press described in CIA files. Most involved were journalists before their involvement with the CIA began.
Reporters, especially foreign correspondents, typically served as "eyes and ears" for the CIA. Often they were briefed by agents before a trip and debriefed when they returned; they shared their notebooks, relayed things that they had seen or overheard and offered their impressions. More complex arrangements found reporters planting misinformation for the Agency or serving as liaisons between agents and foreign contacts, often in return for information or access.
"In return for our giving them information, we'd ask them to do things that fit their roles as journalists but that they wouldn't have thought of unless we put it in their minds," one agent told Bernstein. "For instance, a reporter in Vienna would say to our man, 'I met an interesting second secretary at the Czech Embassy.' We'd say, 'Can you get to know him? And after you get to know him, can you assess him? And then, could you put him in touch with us -- would you mind us using your apartment?'"
Another senior CIA official offered the following description of "reporting" by cooperating journalists: "We would ask them, 'Will you do us a favor? We understand that you're going to be in Yugoslavia. Have they paved the streets? Where did you see planes? Were there any signs of military presence? How many Soviets did you see? If you happen to meet a Soviet, get his name and spell it right."
It was a symbiotic relationship: reporters got the scoop and the spooks got the dirt. Correspondents with Agency ties were highly valued by their bosses for the stories they brought home. And agents saw in the press a perfect vehicle for information gathering: who else besides a reporter enjoyed such free access in a foreign country, could cultivate so many sources among foreign governments and elites and ask lots of probing questions without arousing suspicion?
CIA-press operations in the 50's and 60's relied heavily on journalists working in Latin America and Western Europe. Members of the press were used as go-betweens to deliver messages and money to European Christian Democrats and also helped the Agency track the movements of people coming from Eastern Europe. Additionally, the CIA owned 40 percent of the Rome Daily American, a now-defunct English-language newspaper in Italy.
Reporters funneled CIA dollars to opponents of Salvador Allende in Chile and wrote anti-Allende propaganda stories for CIA proprietary publications in that country. By Bernstein's account, two of the Agency's most valuable relationships in the 60's were with reporters who covered Latin America: Hal Hendrix, a Pulitzer Prize winner from the Miami News, and Jerry O'Leary of the Washington Star. CIA files on Hendrix (who went on to become a high-ranking official at ITT) detail information that he provided agents about Cuban exiles in Miami. O'Leary's file lists him as a valued asset in both Haiti and the Dominican Republic, although he denies having a formal relationship with the Agency. "I might call them up and say something like, "Papa Doc has the clap, did you know that? and they'd put it in the file," O'Leary told Bernstein. "I don't consider that reporting for them. It's useful to be friendly to them, and generally I felt friendly to them. But I think that they were more helpful to me than I was to them."
To greater and lesser degrees, many journalists at the time shared the belief that relationships with the intelligence community were useful and that lending aid was the right thing to do. "Many (journalists working with the CIA) had gone to the same schools as their CIA handlers, moved in the same circles, shared fashionably liberal, anti-Communist political values, and were part of the 'old boy' network that constituted something of an establishment elite in the media, politics and academia of postwar America," Bernstein writes. "The most valued lent themselves for reasons of national service, not money."
This was true of syndicated columnist Joseph Alsop, who is open and unapologetic about his extensive CIA ties. Alsop's tasks in the 50's included a trip to Laos to investigate whether American reporters there were using anti-American sources and a visit to the Philippines at the behest of the CIA, who believed that his presence there might influence the outcome of an election. "I'm proud they asked me and proud to have done it," Alsop said of his involvement. "The notion that a newspaperman doesn't have a duty to his country is perfect balls."
According to one high-ranking official, Alsop's brother Stewart, also a columnist, was a CIA agent. He was rumored to have been particularly useful in obtaining information from foreign governments, planting misinformation and tipping off the Agency about potential foreign recruits, although his brother denies this. "I was closer to the Agency than Stew was, though Stew was very close," Joseph Alsop once said. "I dare say he did perform some tasks -- he just did the correct thing as an American."
Also notable is New York Times columnist C.L. Sulzberger (CFR), who the CIA lists as a valuable source of information throughout the 50's. Sulzberger claims that he "would never get near the spook business," but admits to sharing information with agents, many of whom were close personal friends: "I'm sure they consider me an asset. They can ask me questions. They find out you're going to Slobovia and they say, 'Can we talk to you when you get back?' Or they'll want to know if the head of the Ruritanian government is suffering from psoriasis. But I never took an assignment from one of those guys." However, Sulzberger does "think" that he signed a secrecy agreement with the CIA (as did his uncle, Times publisher Arthur Hays Sulzberger [CFR]), though.
Many CIA officials long for the days when there were more journalists like Sulzberger and the Alsops. "There was a time when it wasn't considered a crime to serve your government," one official bitterly told Bernstein. "This all has to be considered in the context of the morality of the times, rather than the against latter-day standards -- and hypocritical standards at that."
"(I)n the Fifties and Sixties there was a national consensus about a national threat. The Vietnam War tore everything to pieces -- shredded the consensus and threw it in the air."
But another agent remarked in Bernstein's expose, "there was a point when the ethical issues which most people submerged finally surfaced. Today a lot of these guys vehemently deny that they had any relationship with the Agency." --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Church Committee Investigation A flurry of public attention began to cast doubts upon the ethics of a press wedded to the Central Intelligence Agency after a Washington Star-News story by Oswald Johnson reported that the CIA had three dozen American newsmen on its payroll at that time (November 1973). Then-CIA director William Colby (CFR) leaked this information to Johnson, fearing an embarrassing fallout after both the Star-News and New York Times approached him to ask if any of their staff members were receiving payments from the Agency. (A Times investigation four years later showed the number of CIA-funded journalists to be closer to 50; Bernstein's expose in Rolling Stone that same year claimed it was more like 400.)
By now, the times they had a-changed: In a 1974 article in the Columbia Journalism Review, former reporter Stuart Loory chastised fellow journalists for their history of chumming it up with the CIA and for their lax coverage of the issue once it came to light. "There is little question that if even one American overseas carrying a press card is paid by the CIA, then all Americans with those credentials are suspect," he wrote. "We automatically... consider Soviet and Chinese newsmen as mouthpieces and informants for their governments, while at the same time congratulating ourselves for our independence. Now we know that some of that independence has, with the stealth required of clandestine operations, been taken away from us -- or given away."
In 1975, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence headed by Frank Church (the Church Committee) focused its attention on the Agency's use of American news outlets. The CIA went to great lengths to curtail this part of the committee's investigation, though, and some members of the committee later admitted that the Agency was able to get the upper hand. Colby and his successor, George Bush (CFR, TC), were able to convince the Senate that a full inquiry would cripple their intelligence-gathering capabilities and would unleash a "witch-hunt" on the nation's reporters, editors and publishers.
"The Agency was extremely clever about it and the committee played right into its hands," one congressional source told Carl Bernstein. "Church and some of the other members were much more interested in making headlines than in doing serious, tough investigating. The Agency pretended to be giving up a lot whenever it was asked about the flashy stuff -- assassinations and secret weapons and James Bond operations. Then, when it came to things they didn't want to give away, that were much more important to the Agency, Colby in particular called in his chits. And the committee bought it."
Former intelligence officer William Bader (who returned to the Agency as a deputy to Stansfield Turner) and David Aaron (who later served as deputy to President Carter's national security advisor) supervised the committee's investigation of the CIA-press angle. CIA director Bush balked at all of Bader's requests for specific information about the scope of the Agency's media activities. Under pressure from the entire committee, Bush finally agreed to pull records on journalists and have his deputies condense them into one-paragraph summaries. The Agency would not make the raw files available, and neither the names of journalists nor their affiliations would be included. More than 400 summaries were compiled (a number that officials acknowledge was probably on the low side) in an attempt to give committee members "a broad, representative picture."
"We never pretended it was a total description of the range of activities over 25 years, or the number of journalists that have done things for us," one official conceded. Still, even these sketchy details were enough for the committee to conclude that the CIA's relationships with the press were of a far greater magnitude than they had expected -- and that they needed to know more.
But Bush was intransigent. Heated confrontations produced a bizarre agreement: Bader and director of the committee staff William Miller (CFR) could have access to 25 "sanitized" files from among the 400 (still without journalists' identities). Church and committee vice-chairman John Tower would see five unsanitized files to verify that the CIA had included all but the names. No information on current CIA-press relationships would be divulged, and the whole deal was contingent upon Bader, Miller, Church and Tower's promises not to reveal the files' contents to the other committee members.
In the end, with time running out on the committee, the senators decided to drop the matter and leave a more detailed investigation to the CIA oversight committee that would succeed them. The committee interviewed none of the reporters, editors, publishers or broadcast executives detailed in the files. And although members concluded that "from the CIA point of view this was the highest, most sensitive covert program of all," and "a much larger part of the operational system than had been indicated," this was hardly part of the official findings when they were made public. The tcommittee dedicated a scant en pages of its final report to covert relationships with the media. The information included in the report was vague and misleading and, according to committee member Gary Hart, "hardly reflected what we found."
Bernstein offered the following commentary on the Church committee's output: "No mention was made of the 400 summaries or what they showed. Instead the report noted blandly that some fifty recent contacts had been studied by the committee staff -- thus conveying the impression that the Agency's dealings with the press had been limited to those instances. Colby's misleading public statements about the use of journalists were repeated without serious contradiction or elaboration. The role of cooperating news executives was given short shrift. The fact that the Agency had concentrated its relationships in the most prominent sectors of the press went unmentioned. That the CIA continued to regard the press as up for grabs was not even suggested." --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prominent CIA-Press Relationships
A source close to the Church committee remarked on the investigation that, "if this stuff got out some of the biggest names in journalism would get smeared." So just who was involved, and what was the nature of their relationships with the intelligence community? The following is a sampling of prominent organizations identified by Carl Bernstein and other researchers as high profile news outlets with low profile ties to the CIA.
CBS: CIA Broadcasting System?
Bernstein asserts that a good relationship between former CIA director Allen Dulles and former CBS president William Paley (CFR) made the network the CIA's most valuable broadcasting asset. "Over the years," Bernstein writes, "the network provided cover for CIA employees, including at least one well-known foreign correspondent and several stringers; it supplied outtakes of newsfilm to the CIA; established a formal channel of communications between the Washington bureau chief and the agency; and allowed reports by CBS correspondents... to be routinely monitored by the CIA."
Paley chose Sig Mickelson (CFR), president of CBS News from 1954 to 1961, as his liaison with the CIA. Mickelson (who went on to become president of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty) recalls complaining about having to use a pay phone to contact the CIA, and later installing a private line that bypassed the CBS switchboard for this purpose. A CBS investigation of his files revealed that he was involved in passing on CBS film and outtakes to CIA officials in exchange for payment and that he regularly forwarded copies of CBS' internal newsletter to his CIA handlers. The same investigation revealed that two CBS employees -- stringer Austin Goodrich and Frank Kearns, a network reporter from 1958-1971 -- were undercover CIA operatives.
Mickelson has discussed his CIA activities with Bernstein and others. "When I moved into the job I was told by Paley that there was an ongoing relationship with the CIA," he has recalled. "He introduced me to two agents who he said would keep in touch. We all discussed the Goodrich situation and the film arrangements. I assumed that this was the normal relationship at the time. This was at the height of the Cold War and I assumed the communications media were cooperating -- though the Goodrich matter was compromising."
Mickelson's successor Richard Salant says he continued some of these practices when he took the CBS helm. "I said no on talking to the reporters, and let them see broadcast tapes, but no outtakes," he explains. "This went on for a number of years -- into the Seventies."
Sign of the Times
The New York Times was for the CIA in the realm of newspapers what CBS was to the Agency among broadcasters. Publisher Arthur Hays Sulzberger (CFR) arranged for cover for approximately 10 CIA employees between 1950 and 1966 as part of his general policy of providing assistance to the CIA whenever possible.
According to CIA officials, the Agency's ties to the Times were stronger than to any other papers because of its large foreign news operation and because of close ties between publisher Sulzberger and director Dulles (a relationship described by one staff member as "the mighty dealing with the mighty.") The output of this close relationship generally included reporting for CIA agents and "spotting" new prospective foreign operatives. Sulzberger is said to have signed a secrecy agreement with the Agency in the 1950's -- some say he did so as a pledge not to reveal the classified information he was privy to; others claim it was a pact never to reveal the Times' dealings with the CIA.
Former Times reporter Wayne Phillips said CIA agents approached and tried to recruit him as an undercover operative in 1952, advising him that the Agency has a "working relationship" with Sulzberger. A Freedom of Information Act request later revealed that agents hoped to put him to work as an "asset" abroad. The Times ran a story about the attempted recruitment in 1976, in which Arthur Ochs Sulzberger (CFR) asserted that he had "never heard of the Times being approached, either in my capacity as publisher or as the son of the late Mr. Sulzberger."
A CIA Post?
Bernstein's former employers at the Washington Post escaped his expose unscathed, but other investigators have documented extensive CIA ties at the paper. According to John Kelly of CounterSpy magazine, Post reporter Walter Pincus (CFR) worked for the CIA in 1959 as an Agency trained and funded delegate sent to the International Youth Festival in Vienna to disrupt the festival and spy on fellow Americans. After briefing agents on his activities and taking a pledge of secrecy, he went on attend youth conferences in Ghana and Guinea. Pincus claims that he was offered, but turned down, a permanent CIA position, although he did attend a political meeting in New Delhi at the Agency's request before going on to bigger and better things at the Post. Pincus has written several pieces sympathetic to CIA operations. He published an article just prior to the release of Bernstein's Rolling Stone expose downplaying the article's claims, even though his report essentially let Post publisher Katherine Graham off the hook.
Reporter Russell Warren Howe also has a long history of CIA service. In 1958, he once said, his "days as an asset had just begun." He worked for the CIA proprietary "Information Bulletin, Ltd." and its successor, "Forum Service" (later known as Forum World Features), in addition to the CIA-funded "Africa Report and "Survey." Howe was fully aware of his employer's CIA ties, referring once to the FWF as "the principal CIA media in the world." According to the Church Committee, the Post management was aware that one of their reporters worked for a CIA publication, and that on several occasions they knowingly reprinted propaganda from that paper in the Post.
Philip Geyelin (CFR) on the other hand was a CIA agent before taking a job as a Post reporter. Geyelin joined the Agency for 11 months during a leave from the Wall Street Journal. While at the Journal, CIA memos about Geyelin (which number in the hundreds, according to CounterSpy) described him as "a CIA resource" and a "willing collaborator." Geyelin has come to the CIA's defense in the Post: in response to a statement by Post ombudsman Charles Seib that the CIA should stick to dirty work, the press should inform the public, "and never the twain can meet," Geyelin replied that to the contrary, agents and journalists were "all searching for the same nuggets of truth about the outside world." He took this a step further when he protested Congressional efforts to regulate CIA-media ties, invoking journalists' constitutional right to be co-opted by spooks. "(I)n its zeal to restrict the freedom of the agency to subvert the press," he wrote, "Congress could wind up making a law that would in fact abridge -- or threaten to abridge -- some part of the freedom of the press that the First Amendment was intended to protect."
Publisher Katherine Graham is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations with close ties to former CIA directors Dulles and William Casey (CFR). She hired CIA-linked Wackenhut Security Corporation to break up a Post union strike, and invited former Deputy Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach (CFR) to join the Post's board of directors despite his well-documented past as a CIA apologist. Katzenbach is said to have asked a past Post editorial page editor to tone down an upcoming editorial about the CIA, and he chaired a presidential panel that "investigated" CIA domestic operations (but actually served as a rubber stamp for the Agency's activities). While he asserted that both the FBI and CIA were "the most decent and effective intelligence agencies in the world," Katzenbach had first hand knowledge of the seedier side of intelligence: the Church committee produced several memos documenting his suggestions to J. Edgar Hoover that he might undertake wiretap operations as part of the Bureau's campaign to discredit Martin Luther King, Jr.
Making Time for Spooks
Time and Life founder Henry Luce was considered one of the CIA's most cooperative sources in the media. Luce, another of Dulles' personal friends in the media, was said to freely allow staff members to work with the CIA and willingly provide credentials for agents who lacked journalistic experience. Throughout the 50's and 60's Time correspondents attended CIA briefing dinners, and Luce encouraged his foreign correspondents to meet with CIA officials after returning from trips abroad.
C.D. Jackson, a Life magazine vice president in the early 1960's, co-authored a CIA study on reorganization of the intelligence community during his tenure at Time-Life, and approved specific plans for granting cover to CIA operatives. Former Life managing editors Edward Thompson and George Hunt told Stuart Loory that they regularly allowed military intelligence agents to come to the Life office to look at photos and, since they were public domain, sometimes gave them prints. CIA agents were allowed to interview correspondents returning from overseas assignments too, Hunt said, although he did not consider this to be "working with" intelligence agencies. "We never cooperated with the CIA," Hunt claimed. "We didn't have any of that nonsense going on at Life." --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other News Outlets With Documented CIA Ties Management at the Christian Science Monitor admitted the paper had an ongoing relationship with the CIA throughout the 1950's and early 60's. Joseph Harrison, who became editor in 1950, said he discovered that agents paid frequent visits to the news office to get information on Monitor stories. "I inherited the situation and I continued it," he said of the arrangement, which included allowing the Agency access to uncut versions of stories and letters from Monitor foreign correspondents. While Johnson characterized such activities as "helping out as an American," he drew the line at pursuing stories at the Agency's behest or allowing his employees to moonlight with the CIA. "That," according to his distinction, "would have been espionage."
CIA files show that ABC News provided cover for agents throughout the 1960's. During the Church committee hearings the Agency refused to reveal whether its relationship with the network was ongoing. As with ties to other high profile news outlets, arrangements were made at the highest level, with the full knowledge of network executives. CIA officials claim that Sam Jaffe and one other unnamed correspondent performed clandestine tasks for the Agency. Jaffe admits that he was approached by agents who offered to get him a job with CBS, who would send him on assignment in Moscow if he agreed to cooperate, but claims he never agreed to the deal. Jaffe did go on to do some work for CBS, though, and said he believed that the CIA had a hand in getting him the assignment.
One of the more unusual accounts of the CIA-press connection involves the Louisville Courier-Journal. Undercover operative Robert H. Campbell spent three months at the paper as a reporter in 1964-1965 as part of an arrangement made by the Agency and Courier-Journal executive editor Norman Issacs. The first account of Campbell's tenure at the paper appeared in a front-page story in 1976 -- in the Courier-Journal (one of the few self-investigative pieces written on this topic).
James Herzog reported that Campbell had been hired in spite of the fact that he could not type and knew little about newswriting. "Norman said that when he was in Washington, he had been called to lunch with some friend of his who was with the CIA [who] wanted to send this young fellow down to get him a little knowledge of newspapering," the paper's former managing editor recalled in the article.
CIA sources say that the Courier-Journal arrangements were made so that Johnson could amass a record of journalistic experience (he also worked briefly for the Hornell, New York Evening Tribune). The Agency even sent funds to the Courier-Journal to pay Johnson's salary. These same sources claim that the deal was made with Issacs and approved by the paper's publisher, but neither man recalls being involved. "All I can do is repeat the simple truth," Issacs said in response to Herzog's story, "that never, under any circumstances or at any time, have I ever knowingly hired a government agent." But, he added, "none of this is to say that I couldn't have been 'had.'"
But clues were there. No one looked into Johnson's credentials when he was hired, and his file included the curious notation "Hired for temporary work -- no reference checks completed or needed." Johnson's journalistic prowess (or lack thereof) should have given him away: his editors characterized his work as "unreadable" and it was never published. If that was not clue enough, his penchant for announcing to patrons at a bar a few steps from his office that he was a CIA agent should have done the trick.
Who else? Bernstein compiled the following list of additional organizations known to have provided CIA cover: the New York Herald-Tribune, the Saturday Evening Post, Scripps-Howard Newspapers, Hearst Newspapers, the Associated Press, United Press International, the Mutual Broadcasting System, Reuters and the Miami Herald. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CFR Report on "Making Intelligence Smarter" A Council on Foreign Relations task force thrust the CIA-media connection back into the spotlight this year with the release of their report on post-Cold War intelligence. "Making Intelligence Smarter," released in February 1996, stresses the importance of "human intelligence" in successful clandestine operations. But many of the "innovations" the CFR suggests for cases when "the targeted activity is not easily captured by reconnaissance or eavesdropping," are all too familiar.
"Clandestine operations for whatever purpose currently are circumscribed by a number of legal and policy constraints," the report states. "These deserve review to avoid diminishing the potential contribution of this instrument. At a minimum, the Task Force recommended that a fresh look be taken at limits on the use of nonofficial 'covers' for hiding and protecting those involved in clandestine activities."
Though the task force doesn't explicitly address the use of the press as cover, the implication is obvious. If nothing else, the Church committee investigation showed CIA-press relationships to be among the Agency's most secret -- and most valuable -- operations for nearly two decades. And congressional scrutiny, however ineffectual, led the Agency to codify the constraints alluded to in the report.
Former CIA director William Colby claimed in 1973 to have scaled back covert media operations in response to mounting criticism of the practice. His successor, George Bush, issued a statement pledging that the Agency would not enter into "paid or contractual relationships with full- or part-time news correspondents from accredited news organizations" when he took the Agency helm in 1976. (The statement was ambiguous on stringers and other news staffers, and included a statement that the Agency would "welcome" journalists' voluntary, unpaid cooperation. Stansfield Turner, Bush's replacement, put these assurances in writing the following year.
Contrary to the report's implication that all "nonofficial" covers are currently off limits, there is a loophole in the policy Turner drafted in 1977 allowing for exceptions "with the specific approval" of the Director of Central Intelligence. An unnamed source brought the loophole to attention of the Washington Post last month, indicating that such exceptions had been made "in extraordinarily rare circumstances" in the past 19 years. At least one such exception was granted for a CIA agent posing as a reporter during the Iranian hostage crisis.
Spies R Not Us? Reaction from the press to the CFR report has been mixed. Many have invoked the First Amendment and uttered platitudes about the separation of press and state, while remaining silent about the two institutions' sordid pasts. Notably absent from both the CFR's report and the media's reaction is any historical frame of reference: the issue is presented as a stand-alone current event, taken out of its context as a legacy of CIA meddling and media complicity.
Evan Thomas, an assistant editor at Newsweek told the Post that while there were "inherent conflicts" in using the press as cover, "You would not want to rule out forever an opportunity in which a journalist might be the only one who could help in a desperate situation."
But Jim Naureckas, editor of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting's journal Extra!, seemed to have a better appreciation of the underlying implications. "Under no circumstance should CIA agents pose as journalists," he said. "Given the CIA's record in setting up fake press organs and manipulating the press, they have really lost the right to get involved with journalists. You can't combine their work with journalism, which is about the free and open exchange of ideas."
Washington Times columnist Ken Adelman charged that the uproar was much ado about nothing. "That such verbal waffling aroused such a ruckus says a great deal," he wrote in his March 6, 1996 column. "Not so much about the Council or the CIA -- but about the narcissism of today's journalists."
Contrary to the policy of his predecessors, Post executive editor Leonard Downie, Jr. said he was disturbed by the possibility that the CIA had either used journalistic organizations for cover or recruited journalists. Independence from the government, he said, was essential for both credibility and the safety of correspondents. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CFR, the CIA, the Media and the New World Order Will economic warfare replace the Cold War in the New World Order?
In the wake of the Cold War, debate has erupted over the future use of intelligence agencies by the U.S. government. Many of America's political and business elite want to see a shift towards economic intelligence, to counter other nations' economic intelligence ops, as well as to further the goals of international capitalism.
It is therefore especially noteworthy that the CFR issued the report on "Making Intelligence Smarter." The roster of the Council on Foreign Relations is a Who's Who directory of the political, military, and economic elite in the United States. President Clinton's administration is staffed by nearly 100 of the CFR's 3,000 members. It has been said by political commentators on both the left and the right that if you want to find out what U.S. foreign policy will be next year, you should read the CFR's periodical Foreign Affairs this year.
Members of the CFR exert influence over a gigantic portion of the media in America. Many of the newspeople who operated with the CIA in the past were or are CFR members. The chief directors and news anchors of CBS, ABC, NBC, Time Inc., Public Broadcast Service, CNN, Newsweek, and many other major media outlets are CFR members. So are many CEOs and board members at Chase Manhattan Corp., Chemical Bank, Citicorp, Shell Oil, AT&T, General Motors, General Electric, and other multinational corporations.
It is also worth noting that three of the Task Force panel members who wrote the "Making Intelligence Smarter" report included past or present journalists. Leslie Gelb, CFR president, is a former foreign affairs columnist and Op-Ed page editor for The New York Times. Henry Grunwald is former Editor-in-Chief of Time magazine, and Jessica Mathews is a Post columnist.
Critics of the CFR on both sides of the political spectrum voice strong opposition to the Council's agenda of expansion of multinational capitalism and world government -- what has become known as the New World Order. A report from the CFR such as "Making Intelligence Smarter" will therefore make plenty of waves. The fact that the report was composed in part by members of the working press who are also CFR members is a brazen conflict of interest, in light of the CFR's history.
Will there be a shift in CIA/media operations towards global economic intelligence and propaganda? Only time will tell as the debate rages on. But if history serves as any sort of lesson, we could be standing on the threshold of a new flap of covert media manipulation.
"The CIA and the Media: How America's Most Powerful News Media Worked Hand in Glove with the Central Intelligence Agency and Why the Church Committee Covered it Up," Rolling Stone, October 20, 1977, p.55-67.
"CIA in America," CounterSpy, Spring 1980, p. 42-43.
"Washington Post -- Speaking for Whom?" CounterSpy, May-July 1981, p. 13-19.
Loch K. Johnson, America's Secret Power: the CIA in a Democratic Society, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989, p. 182-311.
"'Loophole Revealed in Prohibition on CIA Use of Journalistic Cover," New York Times, February 16, 1996, p. A24.
"Making Intelligence Smarter," report of a task force of the Council on Foreign Relations, 1996.
"Disinformation and Mass Deception: Democracy as a Cover Story," Covert Action Information Bulletin, Spring-Summer 1983, p. 3-12.
"The CIA's use of the press: a 'mighty Wurlitzer,'" Columbia Journalism Review, September/October 1974, p. 9-18.
Understand that World War II demonstrated the profound power of Mind Control over a targeted population. The brainwashing of American P.O.W.s in Korea also proved the power of these methods. Those Americans like Eisenhower were fully aware of its inherent threats to the U.S. and chose to counter massive Soviet Alpha-level propaganda programming through use of Nazi mind controllers and mass media. The established science of psychology indicates that the conscious mind is not primary. The unconscious mind is primary. This fact makes subconscious programming all-powerful in the wrong hands. This is incredibly important to understand, as the subconscious mind is not rational and can be fully programmed through basic and common Alpha-level media en mass. The unconscious mind then dominates the person's core belief system. This "personal unconscious" layer of the mind includes all experiences which can be programmed. Such programming is extremely powerful over the long term, as this region of the mind stores this information as "literal," even information coming from pure "entertainment." Television was specifically designed by government to function at the perfect hypnotic flicker rate for this mass programming function.
Your secret federal government has been well aware of the power of Alpha-level Mind Control since at least World War II, but remains suspiciously silent on this issue. This silence is but one of many indicators that your government has chosen to dominate Alpha-level media through the empowerment of the 1947 National Security Act, a fatally flawed Act of treachery against our Constitution.
Bohemian Grove Fact Sheet
What is the Bohemian Grove? The Bohemian Grove is a 2700 acre redwood forest, located in Monte Rio, CA. It contains accommodation for 2000 people to "camp" in luxury. It is owned by the Bohemian Club.
What is the Bohemian Club? The Bohemian Club is a private. all male club, which is headquartered in the Bohemian building in San Francisco. It was formed in 1872 by men who sought shelter from the frontier culture (or lack of culture).
Who are the present members? The Club has evolved into an association of rich and powerful men, mostly of this country (there are similar organizations in other countries). Some artists are allowed to join (often at reduced rates), because of their social status and entertainment value. The membership list has included every Republican U.S. president (as well as some Democrats) since 1923, many cabinet officials, and director; & CEO's of large corporations, including major financial institutions.
What industries are represented among the members? Major military contractors, oil companies, banks (including the Federal Reserve), utilities (including nuclear power), and national media (broadcast and print) have high-ranking officials as club members or guests. Many members are, or have been, on the board of directors of several of these corporations. You should note that most of the above industries depend heavily on a relationship with government for their profitability.
The members stay in different camps at the Grove, which have varying status levels. Members & frequent guests of the most prestigious camp (Mandalay) include: Henry Kissinger, George Shultz, S. D. Bechtel, Jr., Thomas Watson Jr. (IBM), Phillip Hawley (B of A), William Casey (CIA). and Ralph Bailey (Dupont). George Bush resides in a less prestigious camp (Hillbillies) with A. W. Clausen (World Bank), Walter Cronkite, and William F. Buckley.
What activities take place at the grove? The grove is the site of a two week retreat every July (as well as other smaller get-togethers throughout the year). At these retreats, the members commune with nature in a truly original way. They drink heavily from morning through the night, bask in their freedom to urinate on the redwoods, and perform pagan rituals (including the "Cremation of Care", in which the members wearing red-hooded robes, cremate a coffin effigy of "Dull Care" at the base of a 40 foot owl altar). Some (20%) engage in homosexual activity (but few of them support gay rights, sex education for non-elite children or AIDS research). They watch (and participate in) plays and comedy shows in which women are portrayed by male actors. Although women are not allowed in the Grove, members often leave at night to enjoy the company of the many prostitutes who come from around the world for this event. Is any of this hard to believe? Employees of the Grove have said that no verbal description can accurately portray the bizarre behavior of the Grove's inhabitants.
Besides this type of merriment. the annual gathering serves as an informational clearing house for the elite. The most powerful men in the country do their "networking" here, despite the Grove's motto "weaving spiders come not here" (don't do business in the Grove). At these gatherings men representing the government, military-industrial, and financial sectors meet and make major policy decisions. The Manhattan project, which produced the first atomic bombs, was conceived at the Grove in 1942. Other decisions made at the Grove include who our presidential candidates will be. There are speeches, known as "Lakeside Talks", wherein high-ranking officials disseminate information which is not available to the public-at-large.
What are the topics of discussion at the Lakeside Talks? Mass Mind Control is central.
What's not right about this? When powerful people work together, they become even more powerful. The Grove membership is wealthy, and becoming more so, while the middle class is steadily becoming poorer. This close-knit group determines whether prices rise or fall (by their control of the banking system, money supply, and markets), and they make money whichever way markets fluctuate. They determine what our rights are and which laws have effect, by appointing judges. They decide who our highest officials shall be by consensus among themselves, and then selling candidates to us via the media which they own. Important issues and facts are omitted from discussion in the press, or slanted to suit their goals, but they are discussed frankly at the Grove. Is there true democracy when so much power is concentrated in so few hands? Is there any real difference between the public and private sectors when cabinet members come from the boardrooms of large corporations? Is the spending of billions on weapons, which are by consensus no longer needed, really the will of the people? Or is it the will of General Electric, General Dynamics, and the other weapons contractors represented at the Grove?
What can I do to make a difference? Educate yourself about the Grove and it's inhabitants, and the true nature of the power structure in the world. Then educate your friends. Since most major newspapers and broadcast stations are owned by "insiders", be wary of everything you hear in the press. If you can, participate in protest activities during the July retreat.
How do I get more information about the Grove? Send a note to: Bohemian Grove Action Network, P.O. Box 296, Occidental CA 95465. A $5 donation to cover printing and mailing costs is requested.
Your secret federal government now fully functions in the realm of the inexplicable due to powerful emotional programming advanced over generations. Only the brave will enter into this realm of truth.
Photo: Daniel Sunjata as Franco Rivera in 'Rescue Me'
In the new season of the FX drama Rescue Me, firefighter Franco Rivera espouses the belief that 9/11 was "an inside job." According to a Sunday New York Times article, the show's writers added this assertion because actor Daniel Sunjata is a "truther"; but the real firefighters on set—who work as script advisers—were offended by his allegations. This got the Explainer wondering: Do any firefighters believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories?
Yes. There's no evidence that firefighters buy into 9/11 conspiracy theories at higher rates than the rest of the population. (A 2007 Zogby poll found that 26 percent of Americans believe the government "let it happen." A 2006 Scripps-Howard poll found it was more than a third.) But some firemen do believe the government was behind 9/11 and use their status as first responders to draw attention to their statements.
The most common conspiracy theory held by firefighters is that the Twin Towers—as well as a third building, 7 World Trade Center—collapsed not because planes crashed into them but due to a "controlled demolition." On Sept. 11, an NBC reporter quoted New York Fire Department Chief of Safety Albert Turi as saying he believed there were explosives planted in one of the towers. After the attacks, the New York Fire Department interviewed firefighters to create an oral history of 9/11. These tapes—which were not released until 2005—contain numerous references to explosions heard just before the buildings fell. Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, a Web site started in 2008, says the government destroyed evidence that 7 World Trade Center was blown up and hosts a petition asking Congress to look into the possibility that "exotic accelerants" destroyed the buildings. (The National Institute of Standards and Technology, which investigated the collapse of 7 World Trade Center, concluded that "blast events inside the building did not occur and found no evidence supporting the existence of a blast event.")
Another common theory is that federal agents found three of the planes' four black boxes and then hid or destroyed them because they contained incriminating evidence. Nicholas DeMasi, a firefighter formerly with Engine Company 261 in Queens, was quoted in a 2003 book saying that he was there when federal agents made the discovery. Another first responder corroborated his account. Although his allegations are contradicted by The 9/11 Commission Report, which says the boxes were never found, many truthers choose to believe there was a cover-up.
Do other professions marshal their own expertise to poke holes in the official story? Absolutely. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth point to the physics of the towers' collapse—its "free fall" pace, the "lateral ejection" of steel, the "mid-air pulverization of concrete"—as evidence that they could not have fallen exclusively because of the planes' impact. Pilots for 9/11 Truth have their own set of theories that focus on the planes' black boxes and flight paths, arguing, for example, that the hijackers of American Airlines Flight 77 would have had to perform an extremely difficult aerial maneuver to hit the Pentagon where they did. Lawyers for 9/11 Truth conclude that the 9/11 Commission investigation was inadequate. There's also Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice (not to be confused with its rival, Scholars for 9/11 Truth), which tackles scientific aspects of the towers' collapse, such as the alleged residue of explosive materials like thermate in the dust at Ground Zero. One notable group that does not have its own 9/11 truth group is the police force.
Got a question about today's news? Ask the Explainer.
Explainer thanks Mike Berger of 911Truth.org, Mark Fenster of University of Florida, Erik Lawyer of Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, and Barrie Zwicker.
Michael Collins sits down with legendary LA County prosecutor and best selling author Vincent Bugliosi in a one-on-one interview on the topic of murder. Specifically, the prosecution of George W. Bush for the murder of 4,200 U.S. soldiers. While large amounts of attention are paid to the also serious charges of torture and illegal warrantless surveillance, Bugliosi sees the deliberate deceiving of the nation into war as crime that easily trumps those in terms of the seriousness -- and body count.
Bush Crimes
"If we prosecute those in America who only commit one murder, under what theory don't we prosecute a president who is criminally responsible for over four thousand murders?" Vincent Bugliosi (April 5, Wash. DC) The legendary Los Angeles County prosecutor and top selling true crime author, Vincent Bugliosi, continues to make the case that he argued in detail in his New York Times best seller, The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder. His crime, according to the esteemed former prosecutor: deliberately deceiving the United States into an illegal war that resulted in the deaths of 4,200 U.S. soldiers and more than 1,000,000 Iraqi civilians.
He has the help of a citizens group called ABA Publishing headed by Arminda and Bob Alexander with Jude Morford. The all volunteer group recently sent Bugliosi's cover letter and book to 2,200 local prosecutors across the country.
Bugliosi is offended by the prominence of proposed torture charges to the exclusion of what he argues is the much larger charge: murder. .
Prof. Jonathan Turley of the George Washington University School of Law was asked what charges were the most likely if there's ever a serious investigation into Bush administration criminal activities. Turley noted:
The two most obvious crimes in this administration are the torture program and the unlawful surveillance program. Despite the effort to pretend that there is some ambiguity or uncertainty on these crimes, the law is quite clear. Blog of Legal Times, Dec. 23, 2008 Torture and illegal wiretapping are important concerns to Bugliosi.
But murder is by far the larger crime with a much stronger case, Bugliosi argues.
The former top prosecutor demands justice for the deaths of 4,200 U.S. citizens, soldiers who gave their lives in a war based on calculated lies by the Bush administration. Their loss is the basis for his murder charge. While Bugliosi couldn't find a way to attach the 1.2 million dead Iraqi civilians to the indictment, those deaths are part of the larger record of Bush crimes Bugliosi stated with passion.
I interviewed Vincent Bugliosi about his book, The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder in August 2008. He outlined his case in detail and the challenges he'd faced in getting the word out after the corporate media blacked out advertising and interviews on his groundbreaking book.
Recently, I contacted Mr. Bugliosi to explore his reaction to President Obama's position on prosecuting Bush and others members of the regime and his opinion of the focus on a Bush prosecution for torture instead of the much more serious murder indictment.
Interview with Vincent Bugliosi Conducted by Michael Collins March 29, 2009 _______________________________________________
MC: Do you think that President Obama is reluctant to investigate and, presuming the findings we'd expect, prosecute Bush and others in his administration for their alleged crimes.
VB: President Obama was on the ABC news program This Week With George Stephanopoulos, and the issue came up about the prosecutions of the Bush administration, potential prosecutions, and he said words -- I can give you his exact words. He said that he was of "a belief that we need to look forward as opposed to looking backwards" ABC News, Jan. 11, 2009.. Now, the interpretation that has been placed on these words, and I agree with that interpretation, is that he does not intend to pursue George Bush or his administration for any crimes they may have committed.
This is in contradistinction to what he said months ago before he became president. He said words to the effect that if he became president, he would have his attorney general investigate the Bush administration to see if things that they had done involved crimes or just merely bad policy. He said if they involved crimes, he said no man is above the law, and the implication was that he would ask his attorney general to proceed forward, so he’s changed his position.
I was mentioning the interpretation on his words. The article in The New York Times that quoted him: "President-elect Barack Obama signaled in an interview broadcast Sunday that he was unlikely to authorize a broad inquiry into Bush administration programs like domestic eavesdropping or the treatment of terrorism suspects." New York Times, Jan. 12, 2009
I have to say that I’m disappointed in the president on his apparent position that he doesn’t want the Department of Justice to conduct a criminal investigation.
MC: What would you say to the president if you had the opportunity?
VB: If I were to speak to President Obama, I would inform him of one thing and advise him of a couple of other things. I’d inform him, and I guess this sounds a little sarcastic, but I would inform him that when he talks about only looking forward and not backwards, I agree that most of his efforts have to be towards the future. I’m not quarreling with him on that, but you can’t forget the past.
When he says that he intends to give Bush a free pass simply because whatever crime Bush may have committed was in the past, I would inform him of something he already knows: that all criminal prosecutions, without exception and by definition, have to deal, obviously, with past criminal behavior. Obviously we cannot prosecute someone for a crime that they may commit in the future.
And if we prosecute for even petty theft in America, what do we do with Bush, who I’m very convinced took this nation to war under false pretenses and has caused incalculable death, horror, and suffering?
I would advise him of two things, kind of using his words against him. If indeed Obama’s sole emphasis seems to be the future, I don't think anything could improve our image around the world more, restore our credibility more than prosecuting George Bush for his monumental crimes. We would be telling the world’s people that what George Bush did in taking this nation to war on a lie against a sovereign nation like Iraq, without any provocation whatsoever, was not the real America. That was only George Bush’s America. The real America would never do something like that. And then in the real America, no man is so high he is above the law, and even presidents have to be accountable for their crimes. So talking about the future, using President Obama’s own emphasis, I think it would be very advisable to bring Bush to justice if, in fact, he’s guilty, as I say he is.
Talking about the future, if we want to deter future presidents from taking this nation to another war under false pretenses, some president in the future that gets a funny thought, I think that deterrence would increase immeasurably if he knew what America did to George Bush, put him on trial for murder, and if he was convicted, of course, the punishment would either be life imprisonment or the imposition of the death penalty.
I gave you a long answer to the question, but I had always suspected that if there was going to be a prosecution in this place, it would be at the local level. The ideal venue is, in fact, the Department of Justice.
MC: Ultimately, isn’t it the responsibility of the attorney general to determine the crimes that are investigated and what aren’t? For example, if Obama called up Holder and said, “Lay off any prosecutions against the Bush crew,” Holder may take that advice or he may not. But wouldn’t he have to ignore the request?
VB: Well, there’s no question that independent of Obama, Holder has the authority to bring criminal charges against Bush, no question about it. There’s also no question that each of the 93 U.S. attorneys around the country have the power and the authority to do so, but let’s jump from there to reality. The reality is if there’s some U.S. attorney in Chicago that wants to do it, it’s possible, but he’s not going to do it without checking with his boss. You don't take on the biggest most important murder case in American history without letting your boss know about it, you know -- that is, not if you want to remain a U.S. attorney; and likewise with Holder. He has the authority and he has the power to completely ignore Obama, but the reality is what do you do? If Obama indicated that he was opposed to it, it would take quite a man to overrule the president.
MC: Where does that leave the cause of justice for those who died?
Since Obama’s not going to do anything and the International Criminal Court has no jurisdiction, the reality is that the only game in town is what took place several weeks ago up in Seattle when Bob Alexander, just a regular citizen, but an American patriot, sent out with volunteers, copies of my book, The Prosecution of George Bush for Murder, to DAs all over the country, with a cover letter from me, asking the DAs to read the book, and, if they agreed that the evidence of guilt was clear and that there’s jurisdiction to proceed against him, I offered to help out in any way that I could, any way that they deemed -- any way that they wanted me to, which would range all the way from being a consultant up to and including being appointed as special prosecutor.
Berkeley, CA, April 3, 2009 — A new study by independent scientists and researchers suggests the cause behind the catastrophic destruction of World Trade Center Towers on September 11th can be seen in the dust itself: active thermitic material, a highly engineered explosive.
The study, published today in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, describes a finding of “red/gray bi-layered chips” in samples of dust taken from vicinity of the World Trade Center following its destruction. Using tools such as a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and x-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS) to analyze the material, the study authors concluded that, “the red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.”
The study’s finding lends new support to the demolition theory put forth by critics of the official reports.
At a time when the American public is finding it difficult to understand the full story behind the current economic crisis, findings of a demolition raise new questions about how the ‘War on Terror’ — an enormous source of recent American spending — was started.
Officials with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), charged with establishing the cause of the buildings’ destruction, have stated that they “did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel,” and that thermite, “or another incendiary compound,” would be too difficult to have placed in the buildings without notice.
NIST has stated that such difficulties make demolition unlikely. They concluded that aircraft impacts and the subsequent fires led to the building failures.
Dr. Steven Jones, physicist and author on the paper, says that NIST has refused to test the dust for thermite, super-thermite, or any other accelerant or explosive.
“We’ve repeatedly asked them to follow standard investigative procedure, to perform these tests and release the results. They haven’t.”
Jones says such tests may be required by fire protection codes.
Kevin Ryan, chemist and co-author on the paper, explained why he thinks NIST is wrong. “What we’ve discovered is not conventional thermite — which is what NIST continues to refer to — but a highly engineered thermitic material, or ’super thermite’, probably designed for just this type of application.”
Pre-planned demolition, supporters say, is the ‘best-fit’ model for the many unusual and unexplained characteristics of the building failures, such as the speed and symmetry of the collapses, and the extreme pulverization of the materials leading to clouds of micron-sized dust particles, described in one insurance report as behaving similar to a “volcanic eruption”.
“One of the unusual features that piqued my interest,” Jones said, “was the pools of molten metal seen in all three rubble piles, WTC 1, 2 & 7.”
NIST officials have published a response stating that the condition of the steel was “irrelevant to the investigation of the collapse.”
Jones, formerly a Professor of Physics with Brigham Young University and known for his work in muon-catalyzed fusion, published in Nature, Scientific American, and the Journal of Physical Chemistry, began researching the 9/11/01 attacks in 2005.
Jones discovered the curious thermitic material in 2007, when he ran a magnet over a dust sample given to him by a Manhattan resident survivor of the attack, and found that some particles were attracted to the magnet.
“That was very odd to me,” he said.
Those particles turned out to be iron-rich microspheres, partially described in a 2001 USGS study of the dust.
But to fully analyze, describe and report on the thermitic material would take longer.
Jones was joined in that effort by several others including Dr. Niels Harrit, a chemistry professor with the University of Copenhagen for over 30 years and author of numerous research papers in journals such as Nano Letters, the Journal of the American Chemistry Society, and the Journal of Physical Chemistry A.
Harrit says that he is frequently asked why he researches the September 11th attack. and says has two answers.
“First, I am opposed to crime, and second, when my 6 grandchildren ask me, ‘Grandfather, which side were you on?’ I will be able to answer them, ‘I was on your side’.”
Co-author Dr. Jeffrey Farrer, a materials scientist and Director of the TEM (Transmition Electron Microscopy) laboratory at BYU, says he hopes the paper will “change the way the 9/11 truth movement is viewed by the mainstream public and media.”
And chemist and co-author Kevin Ryan, a former Underwriters Laboratories manager, challenged the NIST report in public statements in 2004, and was consequently fired.
“This finding really goes beyond anything that has previously been shown,” says Jones. “We had to use sophisticated tools to analyze the dust because this isn’t just a typical explosive, RDX or CD4 or something — this is a highly engineered material not readily available to just anyone.”
In a 2006 interview with Deseret News, Jones noted that commercial explosives must contain tag elements for traceability, but that no law requires tagging of advanced forms of thermitics.
In 2008, several of these authors published three articles challenging the official reports in US scientific journals, The Open Civil Engineering Journal, The Environmentalist, and The Journal of Engineering Mechanics Dozens of other papers making similar challenges have been published in the sister publication of the Scholars group, The Journal of 9/11 Studies
Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization of over 700 independent researchers analyzing the September 11, 2001 attacks with a strong emphasis on the scientific method.
For information: http://www.stj911.com or Contact: [email protected] Phone: 510-769-5109
The President of Mexico has an unfortunate message for Americans still ignorant of the Drug War's cold realities: Some of your politicians are involved.
Yes folks, it is long-past time to start thinking about alternative strategies for combating both the harmful effects of drug addiction and the deadly effects of forcing an economy outside of the law.
"It is impossible to pass tons of drugs and cocaine to U.S. without some great complicity of some American authorities," said Mexican President Felipe Calderone.
"There is traffic in Mexico because there is corruption in Mexico. And that is true. But with the same argument, if there is traffic in United States, it is because there is some corruption in United States."
Calderone's comments come at 3:01 in the following video.
RELATED:
For MUCH more excellent reporting about drug running in and out of US/Mexico, see investigative journalist Daniel Hopsicker's site, Mad Morning News, at www.madcowprod.com. Hopsicker's latest film is "New American Druglords".
A few recent story headlines --
Carlos Slim & the Narco-Politicos
Carlos Slim, the Mexican billionaire whose $250 million cash infusion bailed the New York Times out of a tight cash crunch last week, has long-standing business ties with wealthy Mexican businessmen suspected of involvement in Mexico's so-called "Cartel of the Southeast," the drug trafficking organization (DTO) based in Cancun which came to light two years ago with the crash on Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula of an American-registered (N987SA) Gulfstream jet carrying nearly four tons of cocaine.
A long-time lieutenant of Carlos Slim's, Fernando Chico Pardo, left Slim's employ to take over ASUR, a publicly-traded corporation which observers accuse of moving large quantities of cocaine through Cancun International Airport, which the company runs and manages. Slim's big investment represents an encroachment into the ownership of an icon of American democracy of a man, and a massive fortune, whose provenance have gone largely unexamined.
But on the topic of Slim's shady dealings, all eyes seem to be curiously averted. However it seems highly doubtful the Times' ownership is unaware of them. The barely-concealed facts regarding Carlos Slim's shady connections are well-known to journalists in Mexico.
They deserve to become more well-known here in the U.S.; the links between Mexico's exploding narco-economy and current-world's-richest-man Carlos Slim don't end with Fernando Pardo's ASUR. ...
Bernie Madoff, 'Mini-M,' & Mohamed Atta
Mar 20, 2009-Another owner of the flight school in Venice Florida that trained Mohamed Atta and Marwan Al-Shehhi to fly is in trouble with the law; current owner Arthur G. Nadel, 75, was arrested recently for running a Ponzi scheme which methodically looted investors in his Sarasota-based hedge funds of more than $300 million.
New York tabloids, already in overdrive on the story of Bernard Madoff, instantly dubbed Nadel Mini-M, for Mini-Madoff.
Nadel's arrest marks the second time in recent years that the owner of Huffman Aviation, the FBO (fixed base of operations) at the Venice Airport has been involved in crimes traditionally associated with the Mob. ...
9/11 Heroin Pilot Indicted in New Jersey
35-year old Guyanese pilot Michael Francis Brassington was indicted in New Jersey federal court this week, the result of an investigation into the spectacular crash of a airplane outside New York City in February of 2005, which injured 20 people and provoked widespread outrage in New York.
Brassington, the principal owner of defunct air charter company Platinum Jet Management, was indicted Wednesday along with four other company executives, charged with recklessly endangering the lives of passengers. He has survived previous scrapes with American law enforcement, each time emerging curiously unscathed. ...
Arrested Pilot Flew Charters in Luxury Jets Owned by Clinton White House Official
The pilot arrested two weeks ago on felony charges in the crash in the February 2005 crash of a Challenger business jet at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey has since been flying illegal charters for the Premier of the Turks & Caicos in luxury Gulfstream III jets owned by a Washington lobbyist and former aide to President Bill Clinton.
Testimony at the British Commission of Inquiry Turks & Caicos Islands corruption probe last week revealed that Guyanese pilot Michael Brassington, currently facing a 23-count indictment in Federal Court in Newark for endangering passengers lives at charter company Platinum Jet Management, is in business with former Clinton White House aide Jeffrey Watson, now a Washington lobbyist. ...
DANIEL SUNJATA, once a football hero at Mount Carmel, is sure to draw fire as he promotes 9/11 conspiracy theories
April 4, 2009 by Mary Houlihan Chicago SunTimes
Daniel Sunjata's character starts talking 9/11 theories this season on "Rescue Me." (via YouTube)
Daniel Sunjata stars in the acclaimed cable series "Rescue Me," where he plays Puerto Rican firefighter and ladies' man Franco Rivera.
A stranger looking at Daniel Sunjata's sports-filled high school years would find it difficult to guess his chosen career. Could it be football player, business executive, sports agent? Wrong. The answer is actor.
How in the world did that happen?
Sunjata, who grew up in Beverly and was a star football player at Mount Carmel High School, laughingly admits acting was a long shot for him.
"I remember our English teacher, Mr. Taylor, would direct the school plays and was always after me to audition," Sunjata recalled. "But I never did. I was pretty consumed by sports."
Now 37, Sunjata has a long list of accomplishments. He's been nominated for a Tony Award ("Take Me Out"), acted in films ("The Devil Wears Prada," "Melinda and Melinda") and is a member of the ensemble cast in the critically acclaimed television show "Rescue Me," where he plays Puerto Rican firefighter and ladies' man Franco Rivera.
"Dan is a very solid actor," said "Rescue Me" co-creator and executive producer Peter Tolan. "Whatever you give him, he does something interesting with it."
Sunjata will get extra attention in the fifth season of "Rescue Me" (beginning 9 p.m. Tuesday) when it's revealed that Franco believes in a 9/11 conspiracy theory, a view the actor shares (see sidebar).
Of mixed-race descent (Irish-German and African-American), Sunjata was adopted as a baby by a Caucasian couple. To keep ties to his heritage, his parents gave him an African middle name, which he uses professionally.
Sunjata remembers being a "generally reclusive" child. "There was a period in my life when I was definitely figuring out who I was and what it meant to be adopted," he recalled, in a conversation from his home in Harlem. "Which group do I belong to and all that."
Sunjata remembers his years at Mount Carmel as "one of the most formative and important experiences of my life." After his team won the Class 5A championship he had plans to become a "world-class athlete" but realized years later that the real goal of an education at Mount Carmel was to "produce world-class citizens with courage, class and self-esteem."
"Dan was a very focused kid with a great work ethic," Mount Carmel football coach Frank Lenti said. "He always led by example and worked toward his goals."
The Goodman Theatre is where actors and acting first caught Sunjata's attention. Like droves of other youngsters, he was taken on an annual excursion to the downtown theater for its production of "A Christmas Carol."
"I remember watching Tiny Tim and thinking, 'I wish I could do that,'" Sunjata recalled. "But that wish definitely became a dream deferred."
Sunjata would not return to that dream until college. At Florida A&M University, he planned on studying business until one day in his sophomore year he "stumbled across the theater program" and was smitten for good.
"The experience at Florida tipped me off to the fact that I definitely had a propensity for acting," Sunjata said. "I thought if I could go further and learn the details of the craft, maybe this was something I could do for a living."
A few years later, Sunjata was at New York University working on a masters degree in acting. After graduating in 1998, he gave himself 10 years to make the "acting thing work." He needn't have worried. His first job out was a role in Lincoln Center's staging of "Twelfth Night," starring Paul Rudd and Helen Hunt.
"It was a low-level job in a high-profile piece of theater, and that was fortunate," Sunjata said. "But after that I definitely went through periods of unemployment and had to beat the pavement and work to become a fixture in the minds of casting directors."
With talent and a bit of luck, Sunjata found interesting work in several Broadway productions. In 2003, he received a Tony nomination for his role as gay baseball player Darren Lemming in Richard Greenberg's hit play "Take Me Out." He also starred with Jennifer Garner and Kevin Kline in a 2007 staging of "Cyrano de Bergerac."
While theater remains his first love ("I prefer the immediacy of a live audience"), Sunjata says film and television work helps pay the bills.
"Rescue Me" does just that, but it's also "socially relevant," which he says is rare in television.
"Rescue Me" stars Denis Leary as a firefighter haunted by memories of 9/11 and ghosts of the past. Sunjata's character is one of his buddies in the New York fire station where they work. Many of the more amorous plot lines revolve around his character.
"The show oscillates between examining the heroism of being a firefighter and what it is that makes these guys, at the same time, very human," Sunjata said. "You see their sins and shortcomings and forgive them."
Tolan recalls having trouble casting the role of Franco until Sunjata walked into the room.
"I was looking for the right blend of handsome guy and firefighter," Tolan recalled. "And I was getting desperate until Daniel walked in with the right sex appeal and the acting chops to go along with it."
With his smooth good looks, Sunjata made People magazine's "50 Most Beautiful People" list in 2003. Last month, he made a TV Guide list of television's sexiest actors. It's not something he really cares to talk about.
"You have to hope that kind of thing is good for business," Sunjata said, good-naturedly. "But then again, it doesn't really say anything substantive about me as an actor."
Sunjata remains focused on his rising career and has his eye on an elusive prize. It's a goal that he has yet to fulfill: performing at a Chicago theater. He says he's "taken a meeting" with people at the Goodman, where his dream to become an actor was born so many years ago.
"If I end up working on a stage in Chicago, that to me will be coming full circle," he said. "I know there's a lively theater scene here and I'd love to be part of it, to set some roots in it, at least for a little while."
Sunjata has his own 9/11 suspicions
One of the more interesting, and controversial, storylines in the new season of "Rescue Me" revolves around firefighter Franco Rivera and his belief that 9/11 was an "inside job."
As it turns out, Daniel Sunjata, who plays Franco, subscribes to the same conspiracy theory.
"I was shocked that they added it to the show," Sunjata admitted. "When I saw the script, I thought it was a practical joke."
Executive producer Peter Tolan says Sunjata is "well read" and has "done a lot of research" on the topic.
"Obviously, not all of us buy into it," Tolan said. "But we thought it was an interesting angle and it was sitting right there in our lap."
In the second episode of the season, Franco delivers a two-minute monologue to a French journalist about a "neoconservative government effort" to control the world's oil, increase military spending and "change the definition of pre-emptive attack."
Ask Sunjata about these theories, and he'll talk your ear off. It's an interesting rant that, at times, verges on the convincing.
"I think this is something that should concern all Americans," Sunjata said. "And the fact that it's included in the show, without bias or slant, is laudable."
Cop killer Richard Poplawski is an extremist. But amid the deafening din of the right wing's anti-government rhetoric, how extreme is he?
By Gary Kamiya
AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar
This undated photo released by the Pittsburgh Police shows Richard Poplawski.
April 7, 2009 | It would be convenient to pretend that Richard Poplawski, who killed three Pittsburgh policemen on Saturday with an AK-47, was just a right-wing nutcase. A devotee of the white supremacist Web site Stormfront, Poplawski believed that the United States was controlled by a secret Jewish cabal that had a master plan to abrogate freedom of speech and use the U.S. military to police Americans.
It would be easy for us to cordon Poplawski off, pretend that his ugly and paranoid worldview had nothing to do with the Obama hatred spouted by the American right. But the truth is that Poplawski's hateful views cannot be separated from the increasingly extreme ideology and rhetoric that characterize the contemporary American conservative movement. As his friend, Edward Perkovic, told the Associated Press, Poplawski feared "the Obama gun ban that's on the way" and "didn't like our rights being infringed upon."
Such obsessions don't come out of a vacuum. Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and the GOP have been whipping up hatred and fear of Obama and "liberal Democrats" for years. Joined by the National Rifle Association, which has run false and irresponsible ads claiming that Obama is planning to take away Americans' guns, they have encouraged and helped to create a pathological right-wing subculture in which free-floating hatred of "the government" mixes with a maniacal fetish for guns. Poplawski is the diseased fruit of that ugly tree.
Yes, Poplawski dwelt in the most extreme part of the right wing. He is responsible for his action. You can't tar every conservative because a pathological murderer shared some of his or her core beliefs. There has been no epidemic of shootings carried out by whacked-out readers of "The Turner Diaries." Only the most unhinged neo-Nazi wing of the right will defend Poplawski's actions, just as only the most brain-dead "radicals" defended Lovelle Mixon's shooting of four Oakland police.
But the Lovelle Mixons of the world do not have a powerful media machine, not to mention a major political party, loudly whipping up fears that policemen are coming into black communities to terrorize their inhabitants. With the collapse of the GOP into the party of Rush Limbaugh, and as Limbaugh and his ilk grow ever more reckless in their attacks on Obama, the boundaries between "respectable" right-wing paranoid hatred and "extreme" right-wing paranoid hatred are getting more blurred. Right-wing fanatic du jour Glenn Beck teased his recent Fox show with images of Hitler, Stalin and Lenin and said that he was wrong to say that Obama was leading America to socialism -- because Obama is actually a fascist. "They're marching us towards 1984," Beck intoned. "Big Brother, he's watching."
If the demagogues on the right had any conscience, the Poplawski case would force them to realize that their shrill ravings border on incitement. But they won't. There are ratings to be maintained and a rabid base to be catered to. If every now and then some disturbed member of the base loses it, it's not their problem.
Poplawski's black-helicopter and anti-Semitic ravings put him at the outer edge of the right. But his paranoid fear that Obama was going to take away his AK-47 is mainstream among conservatives. That fear, fomented by the NRA and echoed by right-wing commentators from Lou Dobbs to Limbaugh, is ubiquitous online. A right-wing, pro-gun Web site I Googled at random, Theodore's World (slogan: "The PC Free Zone Gazette is American first and Conservative second. It is never anti-American!"), highlights several stories about black men who killed police officers. Commenting on one incident in which the suspect was wounded by another policeman, someone posting as "Bob F" writes, "It's too bad when the cop's partner shot back, he only wounded him. Now the taxpayers are going to have to pay for medical treatment and prison. The cost of a bullet is probably only .50 cents. Unfortunately, it's only going to get worse on the streets as Obama and his minions disarm law abiding citizens while criminals run rampant."
Much of the responsibility for this paranoia lies with the NRA. During the presidential campaign, the NRA ran ads that falsely painted Obama as coming for Americans' guns. Screaming that he had a "10-point plan to change the Second Amendment," the powerful lobby claimed that Obama planned to "ban use of firearms for home self-defense" and "ban the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns."
The NRA's ad was a tissue of lies and distortions. In fact, Obama has -- characteristically -- staked out an extremely cautious, centrist position on gun control, one that has disappointed many advocates of more far-reaching gun control laws. He has never called for banning the use of firearms for home self-defense, nor has he called for handguns to be banned. He has adopted the conservative "individual right" interpretation of the Second Amendment favored by the right wing and the NRA and opposed by gun-control groups, many legal experts and the New York Times. When he has called for gun control, his positions have been moderate. He has called for the registration of handguns, making the ban on assault weapons permanent, closing the gun show loophole that allows private transfers of arms, banning high-powered ammunition that could pierce policemen's protective vests and for national legislation against carrying concealed weapons.
It's true Obama has taken some earlier positions, regarding the regulation of handguns, that might lead some zealots to wonder if he was really a True Believer in Americans' God-given right to pack heat. But none of those positions, and certainly not his careful current stance, could remotely justify the NRA's hyperbolic and alarmist claims.
When the nonpartisan consumer advocate Web site Factcheck.org, run by the Annenberg Foundation, asked the NRA to explain its false and misleading statements, its public affairs officer simply replied, "We're comfortable with what we put on there. We believe our facts." Apparently the fact that their "facts" are not facts, but opinions, is of no concern to the NRA.
When accusations are based on ideology, not facts, they acquire an ominously conspiratorial tinge, one that plays into the psychopathologies of losers like Poplawski -- or like Timothy McVeigh, whose life bears a disturbingly close resemblance to Poplawski's. And you'd have to go back to Barry Goldwater to find a degree of conspiratorial paranoia equal to that being pumped out by the right today.
Opponents of any form of gun control have always painted themselves as law-abiding citizens who simply demand their constitutional right to defend themselves against armed evildoers. Theirs is a Hobbesian world in which law enforcement cannot be trusted to stop criminals. Hence their favorite slogan, "When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns." Poplawski proudly subscribed to that belief.
If the right wing keeps whipping its troops into a frenzy by accusing Obama of being a fascist, gun-hating dictator, America may have a new group of outlaws to fear: freedom-loving, gun-worshipping "patriots" like Poplawski.
The Fed reported in March that households lost $5.1 trillion, or 9 percent, of their wealth in the last three months of 2008, the most ever in a single quarter in the 57-year history of record keeping by the central bank.
America is devolving into a third-world nation. And if we do not immediately halt our elite’s rapacious looting of the public treasury we will be left with trillions in debts, which can never be repaid, and widespread human misery which we will be helpless to ameliorate. Our anemic democracy will be replaced with a robust national police state. The elite will withdraw into heavily guarded gated communities where they will have access to security, goods and services that cannot be afforded by the rest of us. Tens of millions of people, brutally controlled, will live in perpetual poverty. This is the inevitable result of unchecked corporate capitalism. The stimulus and bailout plans are not about saving us. They are about saving them. We can resist, which means street protests, disruptions of the system and demonstrations, or become serfs.
The Obama administration, rather than chart a new course, is intent on re-inflating the bubble.
We have been in a steady economic decline for decades. The Canadian political philosopher John Ralston Saul detailed this decline in his 1992 book “Voltaire’s Bastards: The Dictatorship of Reason in the West.” David Cay Johnston exposed the mirage and rot of American capitalism in “Free Lunch: How the Wealthiest Americans Enrich Themselves at Government Expense (and Stick You With the Bill),” and David C. Korten, in “When Corporations Rule the World” and “Agenda for a New Economy,” laid out corporate malfeasance and abuse. But our universities and mass media, entranced by power and naively believing that global capitalism was an unstoppable force of nature, rarely asked the right questions or gave a prominent voice to those who did. Our elites hid their incompetence and loss of control behind an arrogant facade of specialized jargon and obscure economic theories.
The lies employed to camouflage the economic decline are legion. President Ronald Reagan included 1.5 million U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine service personnel with the civilian work force to magically reduce the nation’s unemployment rate by 2 percent. President Bill Clinton decided that those who had given up looking for work, or those who wanted full-time jobs but could only find part-time employment, were no longer to be counted as unemployed. This trick disappeared some 5 million unemployed from the official unemployment rolls. If you work more than 21 hours a week—most low-wage workers at places like Wal-Mart average 28 hours a week—you are counted as employed, although your real wages put you below the poverty line. Our actual unemployment rate, when you include those who have stopped looking for work and those who can only find part-time jobs, is not 8.5 percent but 15 percent. A sixth of the country is now effectively unemployed. And we are shedding jobs at a faster rate than in the months after the 1929 crash.
The consumer price index, used by the government to measure inflation, is meaningless. To keep the official inflation figures low the government has been substituting basic products it once measured to check for inflation with ones that do not rise very much in price. This sleight of hand has kept the cost-of-living increases tied to the CPI artificially low. The New York Times’ consumer reporter, W.P. Dunleavy, wrote that her groceries now cost $587 a month, up from $400 a year earlier. This is a 40 percent increase. California economist John Williams, who runs an organization called Shadow Statistics, contends that if Washington still used the CPI measurements applied back in the 1970s, inflation would be 10 percent.
The corporate state, and the political and intellectual class that served the corporate state, constructed a financial and political system based on illusions. Corporations engaged in pyramid lending that created fictitious assets. These fictitious assets became collateral for more bank lending. The elite skimmed off hundreds of millions in bonuses, commissions and salaries from this fictitious wealth. Politicians, who dutifully served corporate interests rather than those of citizens, were showered with campaign contributions and given lucrative jobs when they left office. Universities, knowing it was not good business to challenge corporatism, muted any voices of conscience while they went begging for corporate donations and grants. Deceptive loans and credit card debt fueled the binges of a consumer society and hid falling wages and the loss of manufacturing jobs.
The Obama administration, rather than chart a new course, is intent on re-inflating the bubble. The trillions of dollars of government funds being spent to sustain these corrupt corporations could have renovated our economy. We could have saved tens of millions of Americans from poverty. The government could have, as consumer activist Ralph Nader has pointed out, started 10 new banks with $35 billion each and a 10-to-1 leverage to open credit markets. Vast, unimaginable sums are being placed into these dirty corporate hands without oversight. And they will use this money as they always have—to enrich themselves at our expense.
“You are going to see the biggest waste, fraud and abuse in American history,” Nader warned when I asked about the bailouts. “Not only is it wrongly directed, not only does it deal with the perpetrators instead of the people who were victimized, but they don’t have a delivery system of any honesty and efficiency. The Justice Department is overwhelmed. It doesn’t have a tenth of the prosecutors, the investigators, the auditors, the attorneys needed to deal with the previous corporate crime wave before the bailout started last September. It is especially unable to deal with the rapacious ravaging of this new money by these corporate recipients. You can see it already. The corporations haven’t lent it. They have used some of it for acquisitions or to preserve their bonuses or their dividends. As long as they know they are not going to jail, and they don’t see many newspaper reports about their colleagues going to jail, they don’t care. It is total impunity. If they quit, they quit with a golden parachute. Even [General Motors CEO Rick] Wagoner is taking away $21 million.”
There are a handful of former executives who have conceded that the bailouts are a waste. American International Group Inc.‘s former chairman, Maurice R. Greenberg, told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Thursday that the effort to prop up the firm with $170 billion has “failed.” He said the company should be restructured. AIG, he said, would have been better off filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection instead of seeking government help.
“These are signs of hyper decay,” Nader said from his office in Washington. “You spend this kind of money and do not know if it will work.”
“Bankrupt corporate capitalism is on its way to bankrupting the socialism that is trying to save it,” Nader added. “That is the end stage. If they no longer have socialism to save them then we are into feudalism. We are into private police, gated communities and serfs with a 21st century nomenclature.”
We will not be able to raise another 3 or 4 trillion dollars, especially with our commitments now totaling some $12 trillion, to fix the mess. It was only a couple of months ago that our expenditures totaled $9 trillion. And it was not long ago that such profligate government spending was unthinkable. There was an $800 billion limit placed on the Federal Reserve a year ago. The economic stimulus and the bailouts will not bring back our casino capitalism. And as the meltdown shows no signs of abating, and the bailouts show no sign of working, the recklessness and desperation of our capitalist overlords have increased. The cost, to the working and middle class, is becoming unsustainable. The Fed reported in March that households lost $5.1 trillion, or 9 percent, of their wealth in the last three months of 2008, the most ever in a single quarter in the 57-year history of record keeping by the central bank. For the full year, household wealth dropped $11.1 trillion, or about 18 percent. These figures did not record the decline of investments in the stock market, which has probably erased trillions more in the country’s collective net worth.
The bullet to our head, inevitable if we do not radically alter course, will be sudden. We have been borrowing at the rate of more than $2 billion a day over the last 10 years, and at some point it has to stop. The moment China, the oil-rich states and other international investors stop buying treasury bonds the dollar will become junk. Inflation will rocket upward. We will become Weimar Germany. A furious and sustained backlash by a betrayed and angry populace, one unprepared intellectually and psychologically for collapse, will sweep aside the Democrats and most of the Republicans. A cabal of proto-fascist misfits, from Christian demagogues to simpletons like Sarah Palin to loudmouth talk show hosts, who we naively dismiss as buffoons, will find a following with promises of revenge and moral renewal. The elites, the ones with their Harvard Business School degrees and expensive vocabularies, will retreat into their sheltered enclaves of privilege and comfort. We will be left bereft and abandoned outside the gates.
The Daily News reported yesterday that Kenny Johannemann - a key witness in the WTC 9/11 bombings - recently committed suicide.
I call him a key witness because in spite of aggressive prodding from reporters about "the planes," he clearly called what happened on the upper floors of the World Trade Center "explosions."
More important, Johannemann reported a massive explosion in the basement of one of the Twin Towers and rescuing someone who received full body burns from an explosion that took place at the base - not the top - of the building.
(The Daily News obscured this part of the story in their report today.)
The suicide note purportedly left by Johannemann stated that he had "lost friends and family" over "his drinking" which the letter attributes to his depression since 9/11.
Here is the entire text of the note as reported in the Daily News:
"The reason I killed myself was 'cause I was getting evicted and can't handle homelessness. I was also very depressed since 9/11. I've been drinking way too much and it's ruined my life. I've lost friends and family over drinking and I'm very lonely. There is nothing left for me to be happy about other than my cat. Sounds weird, but it's true. I just wanted to say I'm sorry 2 any people I ever hurt in my life. I really was a good person when I wasn't drinking. I hope people remember that.
Goodbye!!!
Kenny Johannemann"
I wonder if the person who wrote this suicide note bothered to spend any time listening to Johannemann speak.
Johannemann had a large extended family and large social network which, according to his cousin Gerald Maya, universally held him in high regard. Maya had offered him a place to live.
You have to ask yourself two thing:
1. Would a man shoot himself in the head because he faced eviction when he had a family and social safety net like that?
2. Would someone as well spoken as Johannemann demonstrated himself to be on live TV, write a suicide note that sounds more like a teen aged boy's text message than a grown man's final testament?
Keep in mind that there are other people, more visible than Johannemann, who are actively telling the same story he did in public venues. You can bet that Johannemann's "suicide" has sent them a message loud and clear about their safety or lack of it.
In case you were concerned about them, these eye witnesses are alive and well:
President Barack Obama invoked “state secrets” to prevent a court from reviewing the legality of the National Security Agency’s warantless wiretapping program, moving late Friday to have a lawsuit that challenged the program dismissed.
The move — which holds that information surrounding the massive eavesdropping program should be kept from the public because of its sensitivity — follows an earlier decision in March to block handover of documents relating to the Bush Administration’s decision to spy on a charity. The arguments also mirror the Bush Administration’s efforts to dismiss an earlier suit against AT&T.
The decision Friday involves a lawsuit filed by the civil liberties group Electronic Frontier Foundation, which is suing the NSA for the wiretapping program. The agency monitored the telephone calls and emails of thousands of people within the United States without a court’s approval in an effort to thwart terrorist attacks.
In attempting to block a San Fransisco court from reviewing documents relating to the NSA program, the Obama Administration is also protecting other individuals named as defendants in the suit: Vice President Dick Cheney, former Cheney chief of staff David Addington and former Bush Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.
It also stands firmly behind the telecommunications giant AT&T. AT&T whistleblower Mark Klein revealed that the company allowed the agency to install network monitoring hardware to spy on American citizens.
The Director of National Intelligence, the Justice Department says, “has set forth a more than reasonable basis to conclude that harm to national security would result from the disclosure of whether the NSA has worked with any telecommunications carrier.” AT&T is specifically mentioned. Public reports have fingered AT&T, Verizon, MCI and Sprint as participating in the government’s eavesdropping efforts.
Acting Assistant Attorney General Michael Hertz penned the brief on behalf of the Obama Justice Department.
“The grounds for this motion [to dismiss] are that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction with respect to plaintiffs’ statutory claims against the United States because Congress has not waived sovereign immunity, and summary judgment for the Government on all of plaintiffs’ remaining claims against all parties… is required because information necessary to litigate plantiffs’ claims is property subject to and excluded from use in this case by the state secrets privilege and related statutory privileges,” Hertz and other trial attorneys for the Justice Department wrote.
The Justice Department also holds that the lawsuit can’t proceed because of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Congress expanded the wiretapping program in 2008 with passage of amendments to the Act, which gave telecom companies immunity for past and future participation in the program and expanded the legal use of warrantless wiretaps from 48 hours to seven days. The revised Act also allowed the government to destroy records of previous taps.
Obama voted for the revised Act while a senator last year.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation fired off a scathing press release Monday.
“President Obama promised the American people a new era of transparency, accountability, and respect for civil liberties,” said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Kevin Bankston in the release. “But with the Obama Justice Department continuing the Bush administration’s cover-up of the National Security Agency’s dragnet surveillance of millions of Americans, and insisting that the much-publicized warrantless wiretapping program is still a ’secret’ that cannot be reviewed by the courts, it feels like deja vu all over again.”
Beware the age-old Illuminati sex scam from the Order of the Masons as well as the American mass media. The oldest scam next to prostitution is the suspension of children in sexual ignorance so that they are indoctrinated through emotions which they do not understand. The ceremonial emblems and rituals throughout the Masons as well as in television, movie and video game programming has significant subliminal sexual overtones. 9/10s of the most popular video games played by teenagers are sex and violence oriented. These games are literally programming children for "endless war" based solely on the mass media "official story" of 9/11. These covert sexual messages are most effective on children held in sexual ignorance and who are not empowered by parents with comprehensive sex education or provided the parental duty of sex education at the proper time in their development. Sex education is critical for children to develop what Freud called the "reality principle."
As the parental duty was known for thousands of years for protecting children from the slave-makers, today's slave-makers function through mass media. Like a basic carnival scam, children are easily enticed into the arenas of power and influence through subliminal manipulation and educated parents will choose to empower their children with the truth. Experts in Europe are familiar with Nazi Mind Control methods of sexual repression at childhood which builds a more sadistic and authoritarian population easily manipulated by dictators and top-down government. Only a parent can protect such children through the all-important parental duty of early sex education. Both the government Illuminati and advertisers are targetting children and want them to remain ignorant of this manipulation for as long as possible. Ignorance of human power systems sets children up for manipulation by wrongful authority.
As one of the oldest Illuminati programmers of children, here are some Disney subliminal sex manipulations:
Subliminal sex manipulation in mass media advertising and programming:
Keeping your children "innocent" of the way sexuality works is akin to programming core gullibility into them. Sexual education is closely linked to the development of intelligence as this empowerment by parents is absolutely critical in today's world. It is utterly shocking what results from raising children sexually ignorant: they will be fully manipulated by Freudian sex taboos deliberately programmed into them by the government.
Freudian sex taboos occur through the luxury of keeping children sexually ignorant, which is more or less a modern phenomenon. Throughout history, children learned about human sexuality through the normal processes of discovery and observation which can be repressed for terror programming in the sex and fear areas of the mind. Governments then use the terror which results from ignorance or wrongful authority programming in order to manipulate their populations. Freudian sex taboos were deliberately advanced as weapons of war, as children held in sexual repression will grow to find these taboos to be very powerful. Through sexual repression at childhood, children are now routinely programmed to fall for powerful Freudian sex taboos which will destroy their futures and their future families. The government now attains enormous eugenics results and family destruction through sex taboos programmed into children who later become parents. Children denied the parental duty are many times more likely to end up in military service as they are subconsciously looking for a "Daddy" figure. This is old-school Freudian theory, but it is surprising how few Americans understand the power of this psychology.
In 1957, during the showing of a film in a movie theater in New Jersey, the words Drink Coke and Eat Popcorn were flashed on the screen at a level below the conscious perception. The claim at the time was that Coke and popcorn sales rose significantly because of those subliminal messages. Everyone who knows about subliminal messages knows about this incident, but few seem to know that the procedure used was not up to scientific standards, and more important, the results have never been reproduced!
- The theory behind the use of subliminals is that the messages which are below a person's audio level or visual level will be received directly by the "unconscious" mind, thus by-passing conscious evaluation. At the audible level, subliminal tapes contain music or sounds from nature, such as ocean waves. Below these audible sounds are verbal messages that are inaudible as far as conscious perception. According to this theory, the "subconscious" mind can and will distinguish the inaudible verbal messages from the audible sound messages, respond to them, and act upon them. (The same idea underlies visual subliminals, such as the Coke/popcorn incident that started this whole craze.)
- The notion of the unconscious receiving messages directly through finer perceptive mechanisms than available to the conscious mind is based upon a theory of the unconscious proposed by Sigmund Freud. Freud taught that the driving force behind human behavior is the unconscious mind. He described the mind as being like an iceberg with most of the mass (the unconscious) below the surface. According to Freud, it is out of this internal (subterranean) unconscious abyss, of which we are unaware, that our external behavior arises.
- Through the use of subliminal tapes and the supposed power of the unconscious, individuals are told that they can stop smoking, improve their sex life, lose weight, improve sleep, overcome fears, relieve stress, and be headache-free, along with hundreds of other promises and possibilities. Unfortunately, some subliminal promoters even suggest cancer cures, as well as deliverance from other physical problems. Such promises have been referred to as "one of the biggest rip-offs going" and "another form of health fraud." Yet the powers of subliminal manipulation cannot be over-stated in regards to mass media programming via massive repetition. Many events of high political importance in America are given to brainwashing programming over and over again in popular media outlets which emotionally program the intellectually disarmed listener. The astute observer will find that these "official myths" come down from the same people over and over again who dominate mass media outlets. The critical area to look for manipulation by governments is to study the power schemes of the television and movie programming. Such schemes often serve government agendas and myths which are 180 degrees contrary to the Constitution itself. As governments often set up the protagonist in crime dramas as "parental," massive repetition of the "parental government" will produce a self-fulfilling prophecy of empowering government and demonizing the individual. This is anti-Constitutional programming, as the Constitution is the true enemy of these programmers. This massive demonization of the individual and empowerment of government plays a significant role in American courts, even if largely subconsciously.
The problem with such pro-government themes is that they are so overwhelmingly one-sided. Terror programming is also extremely powerful for the subconscious mind and is, likewise, a one-sided empowerment tool for top-down government programmers. Where the FBI and other government agents are often programmed as "parental" in juxtaposition with terror, this programming comes to the surface during actual terror in real life, thus empowering the Machiavellian manipulator within government.
Those who employ the mesmerist arts against children will vehemently deny the subliminal influence of this art over children. They are either delusional or brainwashed. These mesmerist powers over children are extreme, and those who deny this power are often the brainwashers themselves. This brainwashing of children produces a considerable conflict between many religions and mass media governmental programmers with parents who know better. Many parents are aware of this brainwashing subconsciously, but are not able to understand how it works. Families are now being torn apart between those who understand brainwashing and those who do not. One only needs to study children's programming to see Pentagon programmers at work. Much of mass media is programmed subliminally with pro-military themes and not with pro-justice or pro-Constitutional themes.
The January 1991 issue of the University of California, Berkeley, Wellness Letter refers to "the complete lack of any scientific evidence that such messages can alter human behavior. Nevertheless, one survey shows that 68 percent of the public believes in subliminal tapes, which are now a $50-million-a-year business." The article goes on to say that "double blind tests have consistently shown that these products [subliminal tapes] fail to produce their claimed effects." Numerous other valid research studies also fail to support the promises made by subliminal promoters.
- Think about the claim for subliminals. The claim is that the unconscious mind can understand messages that are below the level of perception, repeated as many as 100,000 times an hour, at the same time the person is consciously hearing musical or other pleasant sounds. Since the conscious mind processes speech significantly below the level of the subliminal messages, it would be necessary for the unconscious mind to hear more words per hour than the conscious mind. If anyone is helped by such tapes, it must be attributed to the "placebo effect" and not to the tapes, since the human mind (conscious or "unconscious") is neither capable of perceiving such messages nor acting upon them. (In fact, in the Wellness Letter referred to earlier, it was reported that "One research team noted a 'non-specific placebo effect' ... tapes without subliminal messages produced a greater effect that those with them"[!]) Moreover, it is not subliminal messages that individuals need to be concerned about, but rather audible, understandable messages.
- When people generally speak of the evils of secular rock music, they often refer to the supposedly evil and/or satanic messages that are covertly placed in the minds of the listeners through a method called "back-masking." The theory behind back-masking is the same as that of subliminals—that messages below the audio level (reversed messages in this case) will be received by the unconscious mind, thus by-passing conscious evaluation, and then at some time in the future, are able to affect the behavior of the listener.
Keep in mind that the question "Who programs the programmer?" is highly relevant in modern America, as the very science of subliminal influence is largely protected at the federal level. Those who "program" what is acceptable at major university research centers are often profoundly influenced from the top-down by CIA programmers. Even as most Americans are conditioned to make fun of those who point out CIA influence, there is little doubt of the profound power of Alpha-level brainwashing through mass media. This is especially so over long periods of time, over generations. As such programming is fully "normalized," it becomes all-powerful at building groupthink conformity for many "official versions" of the truth. What happened on 9/11 is central to understanding the power of this groupthink conformity for the "official story" as issued by the mainstream, controlled media. Such power to influence broad public opinion as to the true source of terrorism on such a day demonstrates the profound power of Alpha-level programming through Mockingbird media.
We now have clear and overwhelming evidence that Republicans employ sexual hysteria and sexual myths as political tools to build their political base and effectively destroy their perceived political enemies. They are wrongly seen as the "get tough" party that "saves little girls" by advancing post 9-11 predatory myths. The Bush administration employs hurtful myths to erode our basic civil liberties, effectively destroying countless families. Even as they view themselves as John Wayne, advancing a simplistic 1950s, cowboy mentality, these conservatives blunder far outside of established science in case after case. Their politics of fear requires sensationalized sex horror stories, sexual hyperbole and deception in the media that actually destroy good families and suspend children in dangerous ignorance and fear. The real facts are these:
Your children are 100 times more likely to be stolen, abused and politically manipulated by ignorant state agents using federal funds than by any sex predator depicted in the news. Your children have a 50% probability of having full sexual contact with other children before the age of 12. One in six middle-school students are fully sexually active and some of these children will already suffer from sexually transmitted diseases. Those children under the greatest risk are those who are suspended in ignorance about sexuality, which is a negligence imposed by the state. Suspending these children in ignorance well into their teens is truly deadly and culpably negligent, though this is precisely what the sex police in Bedford County and police agencies throughout the country enforce through Republican "protection" services promoted by Yale's Skull and Bones members.
This blog addresses the true meaning to these active Republican sex cults or "protection" services, as these abuses to children are not new, progressive programs that educate, but are conservative programs with a long and tormented history of evil against families where children are exploited due to ignorance. Drug companies will entice ignorant families with unsafe and ineffective medication, much of it opiate-based. Then we as parents are meant to feel success and comfort when the opiate sedates otherwise normal and active children. This imposed ignorance is the opiate for the people fed to fools. Only the most ignorant of parents will ignore this critical subject.
These abuses by the states constitute de facto Hate Crimes against targeted minority families, as defined by the federal government itself. Much of this is done subconsciously by the sexually repressed minds of bureaucrats. Just as politicians are motivated by subconscious sexual motives, so also are Children and Youth bureaucrats. It is the duty of every parent to empower his or her children against these bureaucrats and learn the facts. This enormous fraud is jealously protected in total secrecy. Some of those bureaucrats who intentionally injected deadly sexual diseases into unsuspecting minorities are now working intimately with children. These children are in turn infecting other children in an environment of hushed secrecy, because state agents facilitate it. You will not hear these facts in your traditional media, as they are fully repressed by powerful political forces, but these cases are now proliferating on the Internet where the true facts are being exposed. These facts are overwhelming and demand a thorough investigation by our federal government.
When you drop your children off at school, do not kiss them. This is now grounds to traffic them!
Active social engineering in Bedford County and throughout the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is deeply troubling to many parents. It's like a time warp before AIDS, before Catholic Church scandals and before the Internet. Families are being ripped apart because of a deep political divide in this country inspired largely by the politics of fear and sex. We now know that this is a massive Mind Control conspiracy and we know exactly how it works. Children are being secretly removed from their biological parents under color of law at an alarming rate largely due to politics.
Entire school districts are being populated with fatherless children, as Femi-Nazi sex cults spread fear, disinformation and myths all advanced by secret federal programs. These children are vulnerable and their families deliberately broken by political design. The truth is, illegal social engineering is bringing in billions of federal dollars for county and state officials, and it is an unconstitutional scam in 90% of the cases. But these outrageous acts of child trafficking actually work for Republican fear-mongering candidates! Now they can be effectively sued for these outrageous acts of fraud and negligence which divide and destroy our families! We only need parents and lawyers with the backbone to say enough is enough.
The U.S. Supreme Court and Justice Department are being petitioned to hear these cases, but they are being strong-armed by authoritarian Republicans. Even though the Supreme Court has already ruled in favor of parents in sex education and other privacy matters, social agents continue to violate the rulings and must be prosecuted. Federal Whistleblowers like myself must point out this outrageous fraud before the Bush administration covers it up with Presidential privilege statements. Remember, there will be a new Justice Department in a year, so flood them with civil rights complaints and keep all documentation handy. You may also sue local governments for fraud when they traffic your children without extensive or legal due process. Do you feel like you have just walked out of Abu Ghraib prison? You are a walking sex taboo, alienated from your family without any semblance of legal due process simply because you physically bonded with your children or provided them with timely and accurate sex education as mandated by the federal government itself? You are not alone and you are not crazy. These cults are very real and must be stopped.
This is the new modus operandi of American politics and it is based on the same occultic traditions found in secret societies like the Skull and Bones club which have effectively taken over our government. These traditions are completely illegal and unconstitutional and it's time to face the obvious facts.
You may know in your heart that such bonding is vital, normal and healthy, but your family will be railroaded by fraudulent government agents without any due process whatsoever. Many of these government agencies now function as de facto hate groups as defined by the FBI and Congress. These Femi-Nazi groups have been wildly successful in near absolute power over parents and have gone into the criminal, underground world of child trafficking. How do you counter the horrors of a bureaucracy with seemingly infinite powers to lie, cheat and steal your family away from you? Since this activity is kept at a sustainable low level, very few Americans will even believe you.
You know that your family has been deeply violated by an outrageously illegal government that does not honor its own Constitution, but you will be duped in silence. Now we must use the Constitution as it was designed, to confront and defeat absolute tyranny.
Femi-Nazis working within bureaucracies will depict parents as "predators" in case after case, and they go completely unchecked and unregulated. They function under the guise of "altruistic" services. This is a monumental political scam secretly affecting millions of American families today. It functions by grossly political and unconstitutional "get tough" Orwellian programs like CAPTA which wrongfully enforce "a minimum standard of child abuse" in order to operate illegal social engineering operations and child trafficking. Much of this child trafficking activity violates the Constitution, International child trafficking laws and many federal laws on their face, but seems to have no end in sight. We need to petition the Hague as well where international journalists want to do a story on American child trafficking. They can't believe how primitive American bureaucrats can be concerning parental rights and vitally important sex education. You may request a copy of all files used by the State Police for purposes of State Child Trafficking of your children. These files are not labeled as such, of course, so you will need to request all of the following:
Copy of all files on record at Children and Youth Services for each designated child at your county.
Copy of all complaints and investigation materials on file with State Police and Children and Youth Services.
Copy of all electronic documentation on State Databases.
Before you request file copies, do a search of the Pennsylvania databases for all public records and make a list for requesting additional documents "for any documents in reference to public files." Remember, the police are using these databases to brainwash your wife/husband with the same bogus fear-mongering methods used by the CIA. These are historically successful methods used to traffic children and affect political coups. Find out exactly what's on state databases!
MATRIX (Multistate Anti-TeRrorism Information eXchange) is the latest data mining program to emerge from the government. This surveillance system combines information about individuals from government databases and private-sector data companies. It then makes those dossiers available for search by government officials and combs through the millions of files in a search for “anomalies” that may be indicative of "terrorist" or other criminal activity. Don't be fooled! The "Sun King" programming of a top-down "war on terrorism" is really designed to make good patriots the "terrorists." This war will eventually apply to all who defend their Constitution, because the real war is on the Constitution.
The Quaker "threat" to the Pentagon
Since much of Mind Control functions on the sub-conscious "spiritual level" of the mind, the known targets for the Pentagon will include an increasing attack on domestic religious organizations, like the Quakers.
A year ago, at a Quaker Meeting House in Lake Worth, Fla., a small group of activists met to plan a protest of military recruiting at local high schools. What they didn't know was that their meeting had come to the attention of the U.S. military.
A secret 400-page Defense Department document obtained by NBC News lists the Lake Worth meeting as a “threat” and one of more than 1,500 “suspicious incidents” across the country over a recent 10-month period.
“This peaceful, educationally oriented group being a threat is incredible,” says Evy Grachow, a member of the Florida group called The Truth Project.
“This is incredible,” adds group member Rich Hersh. “It's an example of paranoia by our government,” he says. “We're not doing anything illegal.”
The Defense Department document is the first inside look at how the U.S. military has stepped up intelligence collection inside this country since 9/11, which now includes the monitoring of peaceful anti-war and counter-military recruitment groups.
“I think Americans should be concerned that the military, in fact, has reached too far,” says NBC News military analyst Bill Arkin.
The Department of Defense declined repeated requests by NBC News for an interview. A spokesman said that all domestic intelligence information is “properly collected” and involves “protection of Defense Department installations, interests and personnel.” The military has always had a legitimate “force protection” mission inside the U.S. to protect its personnel and facilities from potential violence. But the Pentagon now collects domestic intelligence that goes beyond legitimate concerns about terrorism or protecting U.S. military installations, say critics.
Four dozen anti-war meetings The DOD database obtained by NBC News includes nearly four dozen anti-war meetings or protests, including some that have taken place far from any military installation, post or recruitment center. One “incident” included in the database is a large anti-war protest at Hollywood and Vine in Los Angeles last March that included effigies of President Bush and anti-war protest banners. Another incident mentions a planned protest against military recruiters last December in Boston and a planned protest last April at McDonald’s National Salute to America’s Heroes — a military air and sea show in Fort Lauderdale, Fla.
The Fort Lauderdale protest was deemed not to be a credible threat and a column in the database concludes: “US group exercising constitutional rights.” Two-hundred and forty-three other incidents in the database were discounted because they had no connection to the Department of Defense — yet they all remained in the database.
The DOD has strict guidelines (.PDF link), adopted in December 1982, that limit the extent to which they can collect and retain information on U.S. citizens.
Still, the DOD database includes at least 20 references to U.S. citizens or U.S. persons. Other documents obtained by NBC News show that the Defense Department is clearly increasing its domestic monitoring activities. One DOD briefing document stamped “secret” concludes: “[W]e have noted increased communication and encouragement between protest groups using the [I]nternet,” but no “significant connection” between incidents, such as “reoccurring instigators at protests” or “vehicle descriptions.”
The increased monitoring disturbs some military observers.
“It means that they’re actually collecting information about who’s at those protests, the descriptions of vehicles at those protests,” says Arkin. “On the domestic level, this is unprecedented,” he says. “I think it's the beginning of enormous problems and enormous mischief for the military.”
Some former senior DOD intelligence officials share his concern. George Lotz, a 30-year career DOD official and former U.S. Air Force colonel, held the post of Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Oversight from 1998 until his retirement last May. Lotz, who recently began a consulting business to help train and educate intelligence agencies and improve oversight of their collection process, believes some of the information the DOD has been collecting is not justified.
Make sure they are not just going crazy “Somebody needs to be monitoring to make sure they are just not going crazy and reporting things on U.S. citizens without any kind of reasoning or rationale,” says Lotz. “I demonstrated with Martin Luther King in 1963 in Washington,” he says, “and I certainly didn’t want anybody putting my name on any kind of list. I wasn’t any threat to the government,” he adds.
The military’s penchant for collecting domestic intelligence is disturbing — but familiar — to Christopher Pyle, a former Army intelligence officer.
“Some people never learn,” he says. During the Vietnam War, Pyle blew the whistle on the Defense Department for monitoring and infiltrating anti-war and civil rights protests when he published an article in the Washington Monthly in January 1970.
The public was outraged and a lengthy congressional investigation followed that revealed that the military had conducted investigations on at least 100,000 American citizens. Pyle got more than 100 military agents to testify that they had been ordered to spy on U.S. citizens — many of them anti-war protestors and civil rights advocates. In the wake of the investigations, Pyle helped Congress write a law placing new limits on military spying inside the U.S.
But Pyle, now a professor at Mt. Holyoke College in Massachusetts, says some of the information in the database suggests the military may be dangerously close to repeating its past mistakes.
“The documents tell me that military intelligence is back conducting investigations and maintaining records on civilian political activity. The military made promises that it would not do this again,” he says.
Too much data? Some Pentagon observers worry that in the effort to thwart the next 9/11, the U.S. military is now collecting too much data, both undermining its own analysis efforts by forcing analysts to wade through a mountain of rubble in order to obtain potentially key nuggets of intelligence and entangling U.S. citizens in the U.S. military’s expanding and quiet collection of domestic threat data.
Two years ago, the Defense Department directed a little known agency, Counterintelligence Field Activity, or CIFA, to establish and “maintain a domestic law enforcement database that includes information related to potential terrorist threats directed against the Department of Defense.” Then-Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz also established a new reporting mechanism known as a TALON or Threat and Local Observation Notice report. TALONs now provide “non-validated domestic threat information” from military units throughout the United States that are collected and retained in a CIFA database. The reports include details on potential surveillance of military bases, stolen vehicles, bomb threats and planned anti-war protests. In the program’s first year, the agency received more than 5,000 TALON reports. The database obtained by NBC News is generated by Counterintelligence Field Activity.
CIFA is becoming the superpower of data mining within the U.S. national security community. Its “operational and analytical records” include “reports of investigation, collection reports, statements of individuals, affidavits, correspondence, and other documentation pertaining to investigative or analytical efforts” by the DOD and other U.S. government agencies to identify terrorist and other threats. Since March 2004, CIFA has awarded at least $33 million in contracts to corporate giants Lockheed Martin, Unisys Corporation, Computer Sciences Corporation and Northrop Grumman to develop databases that comb through classified and unclassified government data, commercial information and Internet chatter to help sniff out terrorists, saboteurs and spies.
One of the CIFA-funded database projects being developed by Northrop Grumman and dubbed “Person Search,” is designed “to provide comprehensive information about people of interest.” It will include the ability to search government as well as commercial databases. Another project, “The Insider Threat Initiative,” intends to “develop systems able to detect, mitigate and investigate insider threats,” as well as the ability to “identify and document normal and abnormal activities and ‘behaviors,’” according to the Computer Sciences Corp. contract. A separate CIFA contract with a small Virginia-based defense contractor seeks to develop methods “to track and monitor activities of suspect individuals.”
“The military has the right to protect its installations, and to protect its recruiting services,” says Pyle. “It does not have the right to maintain extensive files on lawful protests of their recruiting activities, or of their base activities,” he argues.
Lotz agrees.
“The harm in my view is that these people ought to be allowed to demonstrate, to hold a banner, to peacefully assemble whether they agree or disagree with the government’s policies,” the former DOD intelligence official says.
'Slippery slope' Bert Tussing, director of Homeland Defense and Security Issues at the U.S. Army War College and a former Marine, says “there is very little that could justify the collection of domestic intelligence by the Unites States military. If we start going down this slippery slope it would be too easy to go back to a place we never want to see again,” he says.
Some of the targets of the U.S. military’s recent collection efforts say they have already gone too far.
“It's absolute paranoia — at the highest levels of our government,” says Hersh of The Truth Project.
“I mean, we're based here at the Quaker Meeting House,” says Truth Project member Marie Zwicker, “and several of us are Quakers.”
The Defense Department refused to comment on how it obtained information on the Lake Worth meeting or why it considers a dozen or so anti-war activists a “threat.”
I invite any Republican who believes that I am working a liberal agenda to do one thing: read Clarence Thomas' new memoir. This book is an excellent example of child trafficking in America and how it advanced a draconian, conservative approach to child education. This book is truly revealing on conservative education, how minority fathers are driven away from their families through state force and how Clarence was subsequently educated as a false orphan and rose to the top of Republican power. More importantly, this harsh education system that suspends children in ignorance shows us how conservatives are really made. Read how this Supreme Court justice was educated as a child, ask critical questions concerning the methods employed by a conservative upbringing, then make an informed decision as to whether you now believe Anita Hill or not. Thank you, Clarence, for giving us a window into the conservative mind!
Fox News, Fox.com and America's Most Wanted are prime examples of conservative media outlets that build sexual predatory myths and exaggerations in order to build and manipulate a conservative political base. These media outlets will not report the facts that many of these sex monsters are products of conservative institutions themselves or that many, many men are falsely accused as a political, fear-mongering device, thus sustaining sexual predatory hype that is often completely misguided and statistically misleading.
We can now prove through scientific statistical analysis that the "sex-monster" cases depicted in the media represent a fraction of 1% of CPS cases that destroy poor or minority families, yet these CPS cases are suspended in darkness and silence. It is high time that we have a major CPS case prosecuted publically.
These primitive fear tactics work for Republicans and can be completely documented through review of Republican political campaigns and Karl Rove campaign tactics. Though they produce horrific injustices with children and adults, very few Americans can see through the obvious political manipulation employed by this "get tough" Republican propaganda. Republicans even go as far as purporting to fight "Human Trafficking," as described on the White House website itself, though President Bush vetoes basic health care for 8 million children while simultaneously advancing Republican sex programs that traffic hundreds of thousands of children within the U.S. each year. Without any doubt, the largest trafficker of children in the United States is this corrupt and duplicitous government, not bogey-man child molesters as depicted on Fox News, America's Most Wanted or in Republican political campaigns. This rouse is destroying American families and promotes sexual ignorance which ultimately kills our children.
700,000 U.S. families are destroyed each year for political reasons by government welfare agencies. Yet these agencies are rarely investigated for obvious wrongful and illegal practices. They require the wrongful manipulation of children behind closed doors employing largely primitive sexual taboos. THIS IS FAR MORE COMMON THAN ANY PARENT WANTS TO ACKNOWLEDGE. These horrific practices require ignorance and denial. They are actively promoted by the White House's own website as "anti-trafficking" practices. This is yet another extreme example of Orwellian double-talk by this administration, as the illegal trafficking of children in the U.S. by government is at an all-time high. This obvious fear-mongering is used by the Republican establishment in campaign after campaign to engender irrational and unsubstantiated fears and a "get tough" agenda against a political enemy, now the most intelligent parents themselves.
This blog is about my family's outrageous case of political corruption in Bedford County, Pennsylvania. This case is a purely political hatchet-job against a young family which should serve as a wake-up call for those who are ignorant of this illegal social engineering. The evidence for this fraud is overwhelming once individual cases are fully explored for the political methods used to destroy families. You will find that police, social workers and much of the media employ the same fraudulent political devices in case after case to falsely portray men as predators. They keep most of these tactics secret "for the interest of children." But the overwhelming truth is that these crude, unconstitutional devices of fear serve only the political elite, not children. In fact, too many children are hurt by this sexual hysteria, as it destroys countless families.
PARENTS WILL DETERMINE THE OUTCOME OF THE NEXT ELECTION. IF PARENTS DO NOT STAND UP AGAINST THIS CONSERVATIVE MADNESS DESTROYING CHILDREN, WHO WILL?
Barack Obama, John Edwards or Hillary Clinton and all progressives should read this, if they mistakenly believe that political repression only exists in other countries, or that the problem rests with fathers. The United States is now promoting a new feudalism in much of America where children and families are mere sheep to powerful corporate and political interests. All minorities, political, ethnic and racial are at extreme risk of the new widening divide between rich and poor, those subject to one justice system and those who are protected as the culturally "elite."
My wife, who was raised fully repressed in such an environment that instills extreme fear, may never understand me. I have lost many of my friends on the political right. But I shall prevail over this most obvious evil against our children. I have studied sexual repression, published and performed plays, essays and educated for over 20 years. The current Republican attitudes toward sexuality are so draconian and primitive, so out of touch with healthy science, that these same attitudes resulted in millions of HIV, AIDS infections. It is now estimated that this government-imposed ignorance in America will result in another one million AIDS infections in the United States alone over the next ten years. Despite full knowledge of this deadly ignorance, state agencies continue to enforce this ignorance and criminalize parents who try to protect their children. These agencies are in illegal collusion against a parent's fundamental rights to protect and educate his or her child. With the black death backdrop of AIDS hanging over every family, now parents must fear the illegal sexual inquisitions run by local political agencies that serve to destroy them financially, emotionally and spiritually, as these inquisitions only serve to destroy sacred parent and child bonds leaving these children hopelessly vulnerable. If you have wondered why Americans are so clueless in regards to how this blatant discrimination and political social engineering works, this blog will help you to understand. If you are clueless yourself, you are a part of the problem.
For educating my children with affection on their level of understanding, they were brutally taken away from me, coached about perverse sexual matters that they did not understand and rape-kitted by ignorant welfare agents working a crude, political agenda. Children and Youth agencies actively destroy families throughout the U.S. using these horrific and ignorant tactics. I am a progressive using my urban, "liberal" education in a rural town where many of the residents, like my wife, live in complete Republican-inspired fear and sustained ignorance. For this, virtually every right I may have had as a parent was thoroughly violated by bureaucrats who go unpunished. This illegal intrusion into the family is so grossly unethical and scientifically inept, that they must hide these despicable tactics in absolute silence and imposed ignorance just like Victorians. For they function outside of the known law and modern science is not respected. This sustained ignorance will soon target all children for political reasons as well!
Such hysteria in regards to sexuality is nothing new to Americans. Children of Victorian times suffered extreme sexual repression to the point where many girls believed that they were mutilated because they did not have penises. They would wildly exaggerate any physical contact as sexual due to adult-inspired fear that took advantage of these children's sustained ignorance. And this ignorance was used effectively for sex discrimination against women and minorities, greatly limiting a girl's opportunities in life. Today, these same primitive myths and bigotries are making a full comeback in young children as our states are using police and social workers to enforce a draconian conservative approach to sex education which completely marginalizes the parent. If you believe that local governments can barely succeed at filling potholes, you will not want to believe what they do to children in sex cults within government. Where smug, primitive sexual taboos are so outrageously employed against small children, I challenge anyone to define these agencies in any way other than sex cults. My family's case will be fully documented for the world to see this evil business.
The "Shaking Quakers" of mid-nineteenth century Pennsylvania got their name as outsiders believed they were in the throes of sexual release due to their sexual repression. Orville Vernon Burton writes in The Age of Lincoln: "Shaker Elders feared that carnality had not been fully banished. They carefully policed individual conduct, spying through windows to catch men and women exchanging furtive glances, brushing up against each other, or fondling material objects a little too openly. In seeking to cleanse their world of sexuality, they had eroticized it fully. The more spotless they made their millennial communities, the more prominently the stains of sin stood forth." This insanity is the sexual amplification paradox.
The more human sexuality is criminalized and exaggerated, the more perverse and widespread it appears. There are powerful, subconscious reasons for this paradox, as the very politicians who advance these draconian laws are outed for sexual perversions. This paradox only works in an environment of sustained ignorance which Republicans rely upon. This ignorance requires the dumbing down of our children and relies on the most primitive of human emotions like fear, jealousy and lust and negates good science as "liberal." What Freud called "the id" is now amplified through Republican federal programs in order to engender a common Victorian understanding of sexual "abuse" used to make peasant-like subjects conform. Now basic sex education is depicted as "abusive." Sexual amplification is now routinely used against your children very effectively in order to keep them unnaturally ignorant. Sexual amplification works especially easily with young children who may be too young to know what the law means by adult intent in sexual matters and are coached to exaggerate affection or any physicality as sexual. Republican zero-tolerance laws concerning a draconian approach to sexuality take advantage of these children's imposed ignorance and are having the same effect of eroticizing everything, even our children, for purposes of shame, criminality and political power against the parents. This often drives young mothers and entire communities toward irrational sexual hysteria and fear forcing them to conform to this repressive government's underground legal system. AND THIS POLITICAL TACTIC IS WORKING and constitutes widespread CHILD ABUSE by the state.
The irony, of course, is that if children were educated in a timely fashion about ethics, sexuality and actually empowered to talk about these subjects, sexual ignorance would cease to have any mythical powers over them. They would not be raised to find sexuality either funny or perverse. They would be raised to distinguish these differences as intelligent beings, not "innocent" idiots.
My views on sex education come right out of Harvard and the HIV, AIDS disaster, but this education is also easy to manipulate out of context by corrupt, political bureaucrats and is now considered too "liberal" in this part of Appalachia. Because my children were raised empowered to speak and discuss sexual matters, they were targeted by the state for child trafficking and I was removed from their lives by state force. The state finds this education dangerous precisely because it challenges the political system that sustains this evil ignorance.
Timely sex education is not the kind of sound education your children will receive in much of middle America. As with alcohol awareness and education, your children's education will be highly limited as they will be sustained in ignorance for too long due to ill-conceived, draconian state laws. Many of them will become binge drinkers due to this state-imposed ignorance concerning alcohol. Since alcohol is shrouded in myth and mystery for most children, it's allure will attract them wrongfully once they leave the home. But we risk much more than more AIDS deaths due to sexual ignorance, we risk total degeneration and depravity of our childrens' emotional lives. I have accepted the fact that our country is polarized on this most divisive and possibly most primal of issues. But the Republican Fear Machine will not hold power forever and will be fully exposed as the false prophet that it is. You will soon hear of the horrific abuses of power done by these same bureaucrats against innocent children and families. You will also hear of the true consequences of sustaining children in ignorance: the bigotries, the learned dependence and the utter hopelessness that it instills in them.
I now know that the political extremes of radical conservatives are truly perverse and evil. The Democrats must fully address the false paradigm that portrays them as "loose" or "perverse." Republican learned ignorance and suppression of sexual knowledge and understanding is the source of their perverse power. For, without this repression, many or most children would not adopt the Republican feudalism, materialism and militarism. Many of the horror stories of sex monsters that Republicans rely upon for votes will also diminish as the true context to many of these stories are revealed. Many of these horror stories are culled from over 300 million individuals and belie the fact that they are used for political social engineering, are rare or simply taken out of context. Many of these sex monsters who hurt children are just another loop in a cyclical, generational ignorance where sexual intolerance backfires. The answer is to stop the cycle of shame, ignorance and fear. Start by empowering children and parents, not criminalizing them.
The horror stories that play repeatedly in the media, especially common in Bedford County, incite a sexual amplification function that serves a political mission which ultimately destroys any concept of privacy or proportionality. The hysteria caused by these horror stories often does far more harm and political manipulation of a disproportionately greater number of invisible families trying to live within this politically-inspired hysteria.
Democrats must address the corruption of sexual repression within this government if they are to take over the presidency and bring back civil rights. They must demand a deeper investigation into the Justice Department and Republican sex programs used for illegal and political social engineering. This administration's understanding of "child trafficking" is repleat with Orwellian double-speak where the real victims of these programs are political adversaries of Republicans. This is the true story behind the attorney firings at the Justice Department.Democrats must address sexual repression as the true disaster to our culture and our children that it is. Republicans falsely equate sexual oppression with attempts by parents to educate and protect their children from sexually repressive practices. This invasion of privacy and intrusion into the American family violate basic parental rights and many federal laws. That this intrusion is now employed so heinously against young families is an horrific result of this ignorance, to build the lie that sex education by parents is lewd if it's deemed "liberal" and not the duty of every parent that it truly is. The truth of this issue has always been with us, since parental sex education has always been a part of our culture and our history, not the current trafficking of false orphans. Modern Republicans in their new feudalistic justice systems are now repressing our children's knowledge and creating outrageous social ills, like child trafficking, which must be exposed for its systematic roots in government policy. Since most of this repression targets the "peasants" of the new Republican feudal system, few Americans even hear of these horrible civil rights abuses to children. You will hear of these outrageous evils and will remember this blog. We now need the courage to face Republican-inspired fear directly, confront an illegal, underground legal system that employs illegal sexual inquisitions and speak our minds clearly and demand that our Constitution decide this matter.
The Roberts Court is in the unique position to be the most distinguished and revolutionary of all Supreme Courts, as , ironically, the cultural wars find a central theme in seeking sanity for our children. Sexual repression in much of America has reached an epidemic level where irrational hysteria is driving a draconian political movement. I argue that this is the most important case for the 21st century, as I prove how the failed factory school systems are so wantonly fraudulent against federal programs by programming our children in silence and ignorance. Most parents would be utterly shocked by the new methods employed to lure children into compromising "sexual" admissions that cannot be easily challenged. To do so would be nearly as unethical as the political methods now routinely employed against young families. All of these outrageous practices are nothing new for an administration that tortures (they honor no law that applies to them), but as I expose these horrific methods used against our own children, I will press for absolute termination of these practices under color of law and a full accounting of this outrageous fraud. As I function as a federal whistleblower, I am in contact with key lawmakers, families and lawyers about illegal social engineering in the United States. The American courts are at a crossroads where the cultural wars have reached critical mass, even as the Court has historically favored parents. Now these parents demand justice, and they number in the hundreds of thousands.
We now know that keeping children ignorant or banning affection or basic knowledge fosters vulnerability, contempt and distrust in these children. As they grow older, they learn to distrust adults, teachers and parents for failing them in one of the most important duties of parenting: timely sexual education. Republicans have succeeded in calling these duties "sexing up" children, much as other ignorant political movements have done. Now parents must empower their children against the government itself for imposing ignorance on children, leaving them vulnerable, intellectually stunted and politically manipulated. The parental rights movement advanced in post-war Europe was largely a reaction to the horrors of fascist regimes against these basic human rights. These horrors are well documented, but just how the average German citizen became conditioned to accept these horrors is less well understood. Europeans learned that authoritarian repression of children produced horrific results and demanded basic rights for both fathers and mothers to secure emotional and meaningful attachments with their children.
Now these basic human rights are under attack in America and can be reaffirmed by both fundamentalist jurors as well as liberals on the Court. As the states are actively abusing basic parental due process, good science and civil rights for political and financial gain, these intolerable abuses to families and illegal sexual inquisitions must be addressed for the sanity of our children. The illegal government programs drafted by political cultural engineers have already been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court and require massive damage awards to abused children and families. They lead to inevitable institutional abuse and fraud that must be reversed. If we fight the civil rights abuses of the Taliban in Asia, why not look at our own Talibanic repression here at home, at the way these childrens' lives are repressed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania?
Even as the vast amount of cultures practice naturalistic parenting and attachment theory for basic education of children, the Republican majority in the previous Congress has silently adopted a purely political intrusion into the American family that targets these parents as "liberals." The most advanced governments on earth advance such education as a parent's duty. It's hard to believe that this has become a progressive idea, but sex education under the Republicans is draconian and fully repressed, as my family's case is an obvious example. Our case is an obvious abuse of my rights as an educated parent working for the state, as my own two-year-old daughter was rape-kitted because of letters I wrote about state abuse. Such a case is just the tip of the iceberg and a total outrage against good parenting, where innocent parents and children are now political pawns manipulated through a thoroughly corrupt "legal" system. The machinations of this corruption is easy to prove, as I will do in spades. Once these children are programmed for Republican bigotries, someone like Carl Rove will arise to manipulate their conditioned fears and bigotries for votes. With this system, why focus on the smartest children or intelligent educational choices? The dumbing down of America serves a political mission which is more in the gutter than in the ivory towers but unifies an electorate through learned ignorance. This is how the sexual amplification paradox works for Republicans.
Psychoanalytic theory is the basis for much reasoning for secure and healthy relationships with both fathers and mothers through naturalistic, moral reasoning with children on their level of understanding that is standard practice in much of Europe and Asia. Children learn best from this approach, as much of the hysteria in regards to sexuality is rare in these countries. After all, children cannot be expected to understand sexual fairness or sexual differences without this fundamental education in the home. On the other hand, if children are sustained in ignorance about basic sexual understanding, they often adopt bigotries and various negative attitudes or fears on a subconscious level that stays with them throughout their lives. But as "traditional" families are being destroyed through governments that impose sexual repression, the non-traditional families are in much greater danger of this misguided ignorance.
Today, too many prosecutorial agents of state, private and local agencies are falsely portraying basic sex education in the home as criminal, denying the fact that this education is a duty in most of the world. They broadly propagate these myths in order to destroy families. These are largely authoritarian, Republican approaches to early childhood sex education and awareness that exist virtually no where else in the industrialized world but in the U.S.. Since the Republican "cultural revolution" of the 1990s through 2006, children have been routinely depicted as "offenders" for showing any basic sexual knowledge or affection as this is now depicted as "sexual harassment" or "sexual abuse" by a truly warped, ignorant and misguided political movement which imposes learned ignorance onto our youngest children. Teachers know this ignorance intuitively as "the silent treatment:" this is all a teacher is allowed to do when over-hearing the sexual ignorance of children. Teachers also know that children adopt myths and bigotries by this sustained ignorance, but are not in a position to correct this. Now, even parents are not allowed to correct this ignorance for fear of the local sex police.
This political movement is now indoctrinating children at the Head Start and Kindergarten level and criminalizing good parents through a vaguely disguised "traditional" religious imperative. They call this education "lewd," when in fact, it is vital to every society on earth throughout known human history. Why is virtually anything regarding sexuality now "lewd" to these particular Americans? Need we revisit the conditioned ignorance of the 1930s Germans as they were conditioned for disgust in wrongful matters of racial ignorance? Now even things you learned in the bathroom from your parents is targeted and mined for political purposes like a Ken Starr inquisition. Sexually repressed adults can now find it nearly impossible to even discuss this important issue for fear of political attacks against them. Hasn't science already proven that such sexual repression is dangerous and wrong? Isn't there a scientific link between nationalistic, authoritarian politics, sexual repression and countless social ills? This education is so natural and unavoidable that few parents are aware of doing it intuitively, much less prepared for government-inspired sexual hysteria that can now easily destroy their families for political reasons.
The person who finds this entire issue "repugnant," is most likely the product of a sexually repressive, authoritarian education system and he may not even know it. He may have no intellectual freedom and may not even know it. This repugnance is programmed into him, as he is not born with it. He is probably the person who is most needy in understanding the basis for this repugnance since his emotional understanding of human sexuality may be locked in at a 3rd or 4th grade level. Even if this explains why Republicans can be so selfish and thoughtless, don't ask a liberal to raise his children this way. Few Americans understand that "emotional understanding" functions largely on a subconscious level and is distinctively different from conscious understanding. They may understand this from their own naturalistic upbringing or may be conditioned in ignorance to find basic sex education repulsive. This understanding can be fully or partially repressed through authoritarian force.
Even though this person may be ideal for military service, being conditioned for conformity, this person is not well adjusted for significant social and personal bonds. Psychoanalysts have understood this for over 100 years, and routinely explore an adult patients childhood to understand his unique disposition, when his education has been repressed which often indicates harmful sexual repression imposed wrongly by authority figures. This is so common that most Americans enjoy fun with it in sitcoms about Psychologists. It's too easy to enjoy the anti-repressive, subversive humor of Monty Python or Saturday Night Live and not realize that for many people in this country, sexual repression is dead serious. He may "freak out" in adult relationships or when his child experiences normal sexual development that he himself has been repressed by not experiencing, turn to alcohol or drugs, turn to abuse or other anti-social behavior as a response to learned ignorance. Instead, he will most likely live his entire life in denial of the unconscious repression that drives him and ignore the science that can help him. Most of these problems could have been avoided had he been educated about the fundamentals of intimacy, sexuality and ethics in a timely fashion, by compassionate, educated and most of all, affectionate parents.
One fact that the state hides in case after case: those sex monsters portrayed in the media were not raised by affectionate parents and were failed by state systems that suspended them in sexual ignorance. This is the most blatantly under-reported fact in all sexual predatory hype.
Most hospitals, universities and pediatricians advocate naturalistic parenting like breast feeding and sex education, though today's parents can have their children stolen for naturalistic parenting by fraudulent state agencies. Fundamentalists want to ban breast feeding in public, ban nudity and sex education in the home, as well as allow the states to impose draconian civil rights abuses against parents. The statistics on these families are carefully guarded state secrets, but these families are everywhere on Internet groups and blogs. These families have the same stories, over and over, how they are largely silent due to the wrongful imposition of primitive shame by their government. This is how bi-polar our government has become under "family values Republicans."
Just as many authoritarian Republicans bemoan how overwhelmingly "liberal" our universities are, I can only thank God that these few institutions still exist to advance truth over power. Collective learned ignorance is a powerful unifying force for Republicans, but it serves an ideological, fanciful mindset that cannot be sustained when confronted by hard facts. Those who abuse power will not address good science in terms that are accountable, as science demands, and will, instead, employ politics with children and decide who can have children based upon this politics. Their sexually repressed upbringing, in fact, is the source of learned ignorance which requires a very limited, simplistic worldview and what is widely seen as political apathy throughout the culture. Authoritarians can rule through deception, but they rarely govern effectively, and certainly not in democracies. Authoritarian systems raise children to respect authority and not the truth and not themselves. Learned ignorance does not serve children, it serves fools.
This is how sexual repression works: destruction of parental bonding, often due to misguided sexual fears, creates antisocial behavior and repression in society. Children do not learn to respect themselves, as they are forced through an authoritarian system where even parents are optional. Children are conditioned to assume negative sexual stereotypes and myths in their most vulnerable, early years, or else this government will traffic in these children. Cultural conservatives have successfully depicted parental bonding as "sexual" in case after case as a means to indoctrinate children and spread fear. This indoctrination is a disaster for our children. We are told that one million children suffer from "bi-polar disorder" in America, as an effort to sell drugs. Our children are sustained in a false sexual morality based, not upon ethical and timely education or good science, but upon learned ignorance which retards their emotional and intellectual development throughout their lives. More disturbing than this, this learned ignorance is not applied merely by parents out of fear, but by government agencies on a political and cultural mission. For children are now removed from good homes based entirely on irrational and unsubstantiated fears propagated by government policy and money from federal programs.
Even Ronald Reagan's Surgeon General Dr. Koop tried to debunk this most despicable manner of child rearing, only to be demonized by conservatives. Unlike conservative politics, the "liberal" science of psychoanalytic studies is fully accountable and this science indicates a broad sexual repression in our society that is fundamentally disastrous. This science explains much of how we got where we are as a country, why the Pentagon budget has doubled after the fall of the Soviet Union and why child trafficking has exploded in this conservative environment and much more. Americans "trust" their political leaders as many Europeans never would, because they are conditioned to accept ignorance. This is why so many Americans are blind to the obviously illegal child trafficking which occurs all around them, trusting ignorantly that 9-to-5, flunky state bureaucrats know better than parents themselves. What a monumental disaster! To understand this disaster, all that is required is an open mind and an understanding that the Supreme Court has already made this sexual repression illegal for a reason: government agents historically get this delicate, private family matter wrong in case after case. The Court knew that parents know intuitively how to raise children, not this inept government.
Imagine having your mouth taped with duct-tape for 14 years. You cannot smile, you must eat with a straw. You cannot associate a smile with any emotion. In fact, your entire face would be conditioned to conform to the constraints of this outrageous abuse. Now at 14 the tape is removed and you are told that the mouth is really a normal part of your life and you should enjoy it. You are "educated" about the functions of the mouth. You will be able to eat and smile normally, but may not know how. Your mouth has been wrongly repressed in your developmental years and now the necessary emotional understanding of its true function does not exist in your subconscious mind. Therefore, you may not over-eat as many Americans do, but you may never smile naturally either. This repression of sexual knowledge is just as destructive. Our sexually repressive government is now so draconian and ignorant of a parent's role in basic sex education, that our entire country pays an horrific price for this political intrusion into the family by institutional hacks.
Even as domestic violence is higher on many military bases than in most American rural communities, the frequency of child trafficking at these bases is virtually non-existent. The frequency of child trafficking in civilian America, on the other hand, is much higher than most Americans realize. There is a reason for this and this reason is fully entrenched in our local and state governments and is completely unconstitutional. The fact is that child trafficking is a political process that targets "liberals" and other minorities who do not "conform." Parents are told of "risk" to children of domestic violence. But those parents in the military have little to fear from local sex police, since their children are protected by their status as "conformers." Sociologists can now accurately discover protected "conformers" throughout our society that indicates a clear, political bias that violates equal protection laws.
In ruling after ruling the Supreme Court has said that non-conforming parents must be allowed these most fundamental of rights, but the opposite trend is now occurring throughout the U.S.. This trend is largely "silent" for a reason. These practices are outrageously illegal and unconstitutional, even against international laws on human rights.
Why was Ken Starr allowed to spend $50 million taxpayer dollars to investigate an old business deal of a sitting president only to find out what most Europeans already know? Most political leaders are driven by subconscious sex drives and liberal leaders tend to be less sexually repressed than conservative leaders. What we also know about history is that those despots who are the most sexually repressed are also the most dangerous to all humankind. For this knowledge, Freud was exceedingly wise to leave Nazi Germany in the 1930s, as he would have been one of those "intellectuals" who disappeared. The Nazis employed sexual repression to such an effective degree that genocide was made politically possible by a largely "Christian" generation fully repressed by the cult of authoritarian nationalists. One of the first indicators of fascism is the disappearance of psychoanalysts, for they are the canary in the mine for sexual repression. And today, psychoanalysts, sociologists and pediatricians are fully engaged in making this case against sexually repressive, authoritarian Republicans. We are risking a total disaster with these barbaric policies, and it is high time to wake up.
As our children learned of oral sex from Ken Starr and the evening news, we as parents were justifiably terrified of explaining this to children because they can actually be taken away from us for this knowledge. A black male in Georgia is given a 10 year prison sentence for oral sex. He was 17, she was 15, older than Romeo and Juliet. There is no outrage over this sentencing among conservatives, they seem to see themselves as miraculously conceived, like snow-babies. This learned ignorance seems absurd on its face but most parents are aware of this theft of children, even if only subconsciously. This administration now spends much more than Ken Starr ever dreamed investigating "liberal" or "nonconforming" parents and the outcome is horrific. But just as a sexually repressed populace finds nothing alarming in our country's impending financial and moral bankruptcy, we are likewise bankrupting our children emotionally and don't even know it. We live in conditioned learned ignorance which science now understands can make our children fatter and dumber. What's worse, sexual repression is fully entrenched and will tear apart the fabric of our families.
With Ken Starr we found out that Bill Clinton most likely has sexual repression issues. Clinton was "outed" as such in front of the entire world, and he missed a very valuable opportunity to turn this issue against the Republicans. For Republicans have far more to fear from this issue, since they are far more sexually repressed and in deeper denial of it. Also we discovered that whatever relationship Bill had with Hillary is probably none of our damn business. For this, Ken Starr is a Republican hero? Europeans could see the writing on the wall: that the U.S. was entering a very dangerous era where learned ignorance was taking its hold. Why weren't more Americans outraged by this quasi-religious sexual inquisition? Why were we silent about the most fundamental matters of war and peace? Why are "blended" or "non-traditional" families so hard to maintain in America? Does anyone actually care? Can't we see the obvious truth that sexually repressive bigotries imposed in childhood and the irrational fears that come with them are programmed into our children and ourselves and only parents can stop this madness? Learned ignorance is not acceptable. The truth is, the political successes of Ken Starr are now institutionalized illegally in order to carry out broad sexual inquisitions and unconstitutional social engineering against hundreds of thousands of American families. Ken Starr could not help himself in forming a sexual inquisition: he was made that way.
Americans are blind to sexual repression even after 100 years of solid evidence against this practice, and it is high time to wake them up. This ignorance serves a political interest and sustains an illegal, unconstitutional and unethical industry by failing to enforce basic parental civil rights. This imposed ignorance can and does cause a multitude of anti-social disorders as these children mature, including the absurdities and excesses found today in their own government. Children feel "conned" by this learned ignorance and these children are fundamentally right: failure to educate children due to governmental fear imposed by unethical prosecutors, police and local "sex" agencies is setting them up for exploitation, shame and confusion concerning human sexuality. After all, these children do not have the bigotries of these adults, nor are they blind to obvious sexual bigotries as conditioned adults are blind and it is high time that we make sure that they do not adopt these bigotries. This is precisely why sex education should be done in a timely fashion with children at all stages of their development, even if government is functioning to repress them for political reasons.
You say that this must be wrong, that illegal child trafficking in American cannot possibly be happening or at least it must be very rare. But how would the average citizen really know this? This administration investigates and enforces absolutely ZERO civil rights violations in the United States involving actual child trafficking by state and local officials. The Civil Rights division in the Justice Department is completely blind to this industry within government itself, in fact, they more often support it. Instead, various myths are propagated to placate a political base that lives in continual denial about child trafficking in America. Data bases are built to criminalize parents and children themselves. As in Jena, LA, children across the U.S. are routinely trafficked inside our prison systems "as adults." But this same administration sees "serious sex offenders" virtually everywhere outside of government, over 500,000 by last count (top psychologist publications estimate the number at 50,000) many of these children, as an attempt to justify "zero tolerance" laws and a draconian approach to human sexuality and education, especially in "non-Republican homes." This horrific myth is fundamentally wrong on two counts: first, these men are largely straw men of a far-right propaganda machine working false predatory myths inside of government institutions, and second, sexual repression, as promoted vigorously by this government, is ironically supporting and inflaming this ignorance much as the Catholic church has done. But like the Catholic church, good science is ignored in repressive institutions until the damages are enormous. Illegal child trafficking by the state is the result and is rampant and "silent" because information on it is fully repressed, sustaining an enormous silent industry that exists largely to defraud federal programs and traffic "false orphans" created by this industry.
This enormous industry that permits child trafficking in America cannot be sustained once existing federal laws and Supreme Court decisions are finally enforced. Their illegal tactics of separating children from good families will be fully exposed once the myths of human sexuality are debunked by good science. In fact, many of these private companies cannot exist if parents are truly informed and in charge of rearing their own children as federal law requires. We must demand that child trafficking be stopped by enforcing basic parental civil rights and we now have an overwhelming number of parents who say enough is enough.
Many conservatives are wrongfully dependent upon this sustained ignorance because their institutions require it and this sustained ignorance is how they were raised. They do not have the open mind as required by good science, history and the Supreme Court itself. The states have allowed an enormous industry to flourish due to the illegal contempt for parental rights that this Court has demanded in case after case. As the most repressed victims are often women and girls, this government will promote broad myths about their inherent vulnerabilities based upon their sex. However, these vulnerabilities often negate fundamental equality and education that builds confidence and independence in these women. As these women and girls are among the most sexually repressed, they become the most dependent and the least independent.
Are we a society based upon reason or religion? It seems incredible that after 100 years of solid science we need to re-address this issue, but we no longer should keep children ignorant through there developing years, and good science is telling us why. This is central to parental rights and the hysteria caused by sex education in much of America. There is a much underplayed reality that sexism against men and fathers has been running much of this debate and we need a critical adjustment to this wrongful sexism and bigotry by the federal courts and lawmakers. Men are not inherently more dangerous because they have penises. "Offenders" are treated to broad and illegal discrimination, cruel and unusual punishments, many after they have paid their debt to society and many others accused but never convicted of anything. This bigotry against parents is working its way through all government agencies as a "silent agenda" against countless families. The states are in complete contempt of standing U.S. Supreme Court decisions as well as numerous federal laws that specifically outlaw such abuses under color of law. As the Supreme Court has routinely sided with Parental Rights, the states and countless private agencies are doing the opposite inflicting governmental intrusion into the family that is grossly unconstitutional. It's high time this Court takes action against these horrific civil rights violations against families.
Any lawyer or law firm will not understand this debate in one or two paragraphs as an abstract. I go into great detail with my family's case and how Pennsylvania agencies are uniquely fraudulent, but this is a much broader constitutional crisis. This crisis involves suspending children in ignorance for much of their youth, causing them to believe that adults are conning them on the most fundamentally important human condition: sexuality. These children are likewise being repressed by government force at a critical time in their intellectual development where a host of bigotries, biases and wrongful attitudes toward society occur due to sustained ignorance in their formative years. What's worse, the parents of these children who must function as the early-warning "doctors" and psychiatric screeners for sexual repression, sexual abuse and for the perceived explosion of bipolar disorder in children are being criminalized.
Likewise, we now have over 100 years of science concerning the true character and activity of normal children which fundamentally contradicts the state's myths about childhood sexuality. As this horrific ignorance virtually does not exist in Sweden, child trafficking virtually does not exist, nor are many of the intellectual shortcomings known to Americans present. In fact, democracy itself is robust in Sweden with over 80% of its citizens voting. Compare such a country to Iraq, which has sustained authoritarian control for more than a generation, and you will see a clear distinction between sexually repressive, authoritarian Iraq and sexually liberated Sweden. Through careful psychoanalytic methods, sexual repression can be shown to be very bad for democracy on many levels and can actually be shown to predict democratic tendencies or the lack thereof. It is clear that state agencies now actively promote ignorance in America through obvious anti-democratic discrimination. And we want to lead a democratic world?
I was targeted for this very discrimination as my children were horrifically violated sexually and mentally by the state. My biggest complaint was that the children I had been working with in public schools and treatment centers were over-medicated to the point of stupidity, and that sexual harassment was so widespread as a result of drugs and unhealthy sexual ignorance. It was so obvious to me that these children were on the wrong track and wrongfully manipulated and will ultimately become the criminals this government claims to "rehabilitate" in prisons but, in fact, has actually created through imposed sexual ignorance. Parents who make such complaints against a completely obvious fraud are targeted for draconian state punishments---most of which violate basic civil rights. My own two-year-old daughter was rape-kitted because of my written complaints as a whistleblower, in complete violation of federal law. These punishments are designed to sustain a truly sick status quo and many are designed to function completely outside of government scrutiny. Likewise, parents are marginalized "as the enemy" away from educating their own children in direct violation to standing Supreme Court decisions and children are coached by bureaucrats to make false accusations which are completely unethical and violate basic parental rights. Since these states and agencies have been in contempt of Supreme Court decisions, they have actually fought the monsters of their own creation: sexual abuse cases that were completely avoidable had the states educated children correctly, or, more importantly, allowed parents to educate in a safe, nondraconian environment.
You will learn how fear and intimidation is used against these families by a fundamentally illegal and dishonest government at the state and local level, as well as many private conspirators advancing illegal programs for enormous profit. The astonishing truth is that most of these government agents disregard basic, sound scientific approaches to childhood development, such as naturalistic education by parents. Parents are actively removed from these families, by state force, so that these obscene profits can take place. And these cases are obvious, in case after case, where conspirators against families and drug companies receive money that would have easily sustained these families in full health without drugs and without massive undo harm that comes with child trafficking.
That is why this blog exists. Sexual repression, as it is applied by illegal institutions, now demands our full attention as billions of dollars and countless lives are at stake. This problem is so massive, that it represents the largest civil case in history. Even the Catholic church is liable for sexual repressive negligence on a massive scale. Sexual repression must be understood in terms of a quantum leap or revolution of legal thought (as if it were a new science), as it affects so many citizens silently. So many adults are ignorant of its ramifications on society and want to continue the ignorance onto the next generation. Drug companies like Janssen LP are spending hundreds of millions of dollars promoting bipolar medication for children, as this marketing is designed to promote the idea of a "mass epidemic" of behavioral disorders in children, much of it due to sexual behavior or false accusations of "abuse" by CPS agents. The system is so lopsided against parents that unsuspecting children are easily manipulated away from good families through systematic deception practices, family members are easily terrorized by exploiting well-known defense mechanisms in parents, as these horrific deceptions are easily reproduced by any good therapist if he or she were so inclined to be so unethical.
Dr. David Fassler, a University of Vermont psychiatry professor, says research suggests that close to half of children thought to be bi-polar are being misdiagnosed in order to sell psychiatric medications. Sexual repressive activities by government is causing much of this obvious racketeering and many of these "symptoms" of abuse are bogus marketing ploys and directly support this over-medication of unnecessary drugs to our children. This is a horrifying proposition, but is scientifically provable in case after case where children are being illegally trafficked away from their biological parents through pure deception without any regard to due process.
But this is an enormous problem, as sexual repression is the lead paint in our schools, retarding our childrens' emotional and intellectual growth and demanding our full attention. It also serves the profit centers of drug companies. It is a total myth that children are "innocent" in ignorance and should be suspended in this "innocence." This is only true in the actual pre-sexual stages of development, not in the conservative's "ideal" view. Children actually begin early stages of sexual development between 5 and 7 when they seek basic information and should not be held in ignorance. By sustaining children within the mystique of shameful sexuality, our government violates these children in a way that is historical and scientifically abhorrent. This Victorian philosophy has made a full comeback in our bureaucracies and in our schools and is manifest everywhere in our society as a total failure to our children. Children are emotionally and intellectually retarded by this ignorance, and sex education is the only answer.
This blog exists to show that good science is winning the debate for timely sex education for all stages of childhood development. Such education will put an end to many social ills associated with keeping children intellectually and emotionally repressed. Even so, sexual repression is so powerful that a mob mentality will try to overrun the debate. This government supports the mob mentality through pure dysfunction regarding basic civil rights. This is fundamental to authoritative Republicanism: as former Republican John Dean says in his new book Broken Government: "Republicans seek federal power because it can help them achieve their agenda, and it also helps them in their careers. Few are driven to assist their fellow citizens, or to serve their country. It is power that attracts them; it is a tropism for authoritarian personalities, like the moth to the candle. Where power is concerned, Republicans consistently confirm Lord Acton's aphorism that absolute power corrupts absolutely." Sexual repression has selfishness, secrecy and a perverse drive for power as its hallmark. This is why so much draconian abuse and government dysfunction is now targeting our families in an environment of pure silence.
We must fight this government's failure to enforce basic parental civil rights! Above all, these agencies must show that they are honest and accountable under federal law!
Most experts know that it's best to allow parents to teach children about sexual boundaries through common "naturalistic" methods such as bathroom time, etc. Most parents know that this is normal since it is so often unavoidable. Children are naturally programmed to learn in this manner at early stages of their development, as proven in many psychological and anthropological studies. This is not rocket science. But these agencies are very adept at inflaming "sexual" connotations to this education, especially in non-traditional families, that it becomes purely fraudulent and serves a political mission. This illegal bias is often easy to expose through existing court transcripts. They actually teach small children about sexually explicit concepts behind closed doors. Parents have a duty to employ naturalistic education with children in early stages of development for the health and emotional, intellectual well being of children. Now parents have a duty to protect their children from the bureaucrats who will destroy them. This parental sex education is fully historical and necessary.
Every Pediatrician knows this! Most advanced societies encourage "naturalistic" parenting as a duty. But now extremists are now using "sexual" innuendo to destroy these parental bonds and this time-honored method of basic sexual education that has served children for countless generations is now warped into a new imperative for political destruction of minority families. Are we to criminalize Pediatricians and good science as this critical education is now being criminalized? If parents are not to be the early educators of basic hygiene and basic sexual understanding, who exactly is to take on this role, government?(!)
The irony, of course, is that by keeping young children ignorant about sexuality, they are far more likely to be exploited later in life in a way that conservatives abhor. Timely sex education precedes puberty for a reason: this is the time where critical value-judgments in children are being made. This is why these children need to be empowered by parents.
Today, the extremists on the far right are exploiting this most common and sacred duty of parents while their children are so young and vulnerable. They actively destroy families through false sexual taboos against parents and prescribe unnecessary medication in its place. They will enter our schools and manipulate six and seven-year-old children on sexually explicit matters that these children do not understand in order to prosecute parents. The horrific strife that this causes children conveniently leads to "required" medication that just happens to come from large drug companies who proliferate a virtual army of lobbyists. I have seen this massive fraud firsthand and most parents in Bedford County are at least subconsciously aware that it goes on. But much of the existing government is designed to keep these activities silent and away from public scrutiny. Parents are therefore repressing critical sexual knowledge in children as a result of conservative intimidation in public schools. We don't even know what this draconian repression might do to our kids, since it has never been studied in its current draconian form. It has only been in the past few generations that it was even possible not to be a naturalist parent!
These extremists are now criminalizing good parents for nudity in the home and being "naturalists." These extremists in government are dumbing down our children at a critical time of their development by inflaming sexual hysteria and myths in innocent families. Those who see pedophiles everywhere are truly sick and work a sick agenda which destroys children and families and must not be allowed to rule our government. These conservatives actually think that "nudists" go to "colonies" for "sexual" reasons, not knowing anything about the sexual revolution or how it really addresses basic human rights issues like liberation from militant power systems.
I am not a nudist, but have seen these draconian attacks against these enlightened people, many of whom were targeted for the draft during the Vietnam War. These nudists are intellectually adept at understanding how sexual repression is used by government to criminalize the powerless and make them conformists. They know that it is now possible to raise children in complete sexual ignorance well into their teens and this serves only to corrupt them with warped ideas of sexuality and make them conform. Instead of learning about healthy sexual choices and sexual fairness, these children are basically learning about sex in the streets as the schools intentionally fail them. These children are much more likely to be teen runaways, engage in unsafe sex and become teenage parents because meaningful sex education comes too late for them. But this ignorance leads to many types of sexual bigotries as a result of learned ignorance that supports radical, far-right political movements. That is why so many top psychologists associate sexually repressive practices within government with fascist movements, as there is broad historical evidence to support this.There is a direct link. These programs actually began with early 20th Century American "eugenics" movements and in Nazi Germany. These are historical facts. To understand this relationship between these antiquated social programs and military recruitment requires some degree of imagination, but this is a scientifically accurate, provable thesis which is totally historical and I address in this blog. This is only one of many outrages against our children by this inept government.
Taking a photograph of a child in a bathtub used to be common practice in our country during peace times, now it is a crime and "child pornography" just because some idiot in government says it is or one or two sick people might view it this way. We must not allow the sickest in society to rule our families or our most basic of freedoms and these conservative extremists are the ones who are truly sick. They want to repress our childrens' understanding of basic human sexuality in their most critical stages of development. The children of enlightened naturalists are among the most well-adjusted children in our society, not the children of hard-core conservatives. These people have no compassion because that is how they were raised, judgmental, cold and ignorant. We can now prove this through good science, not through government-inspired hysteria!
I am appealing to those with the intelligence to reason this issue in constitutional, ethical and scientific terms, not through the prism of their own sexually repressive sickness. That should unite both conservatives and liberals alike. It is high time to have this debate!
Psychoanalysis is winning this debate and is becoming a qualitative art and precise, quantitative science that will crush the feeble superstitions and bigotries of the far right. We can now show the ill effects of sexual repression on individual lives with great accuracy. Children are among the most abused and can be tested. If a child is completely ignorant about human sexuality by the third grade, we have utterly failed that child, as many of that child's social views are in their final stages of development. In fact, we now know that sexual development and knowledge is closely related to overall intellectual development. Children educated properly about the human condition are much more likely to succeed in other studies because this burden of ignorance is lifted off of them and the stigma of dishonest sexual repression designed to "sustain them in ignorance" does not confound, corrupt and anger them. Children should learn early in life that sexual repression in any form is learned ignorance and is harmful and that it is not done to them by good, competent parents! They will then naturally seek a mate with similar traits of sexual honesty.
Conservatives do not even see this ignorance as a bad thing, thinking ignorance is bliss, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Those children who are repressed in this knowledge will be intellectually stunted, even into adult life where they are more likely to make critically disasterous choices about sex. If we lock in a child's ignorance about sexuality, we effectively lock in any number of anti-social maladies which are well documented in psychoanalytic studies.
Child trafficking in America is the worst form of sexual repression, creating a huge, illegal industry, much of it based on promoting ignorance and cold parenting. But this horrid practice is fully quantitative, in that, these bureaucrats fully document their crimes.
Those who actively traffic in children almost universally suffer from sexual repressive disorders and can be diagnosed accurately. They will even go so far as inadvertently revealing their sexual disorders in public court hearings and on public transcripts. It is high time we turn the Orwellian devices of shame on the gatekeepers themselves. Show how sexual amplification techniques work on small children and have it banned from government practice. This fraud must be fully confronted.
My family's plight by a corrupt local government is indeed the tip of a massive iceberg. Our innocent, small children represent a gnomon casting a precise and broad shadow across our entire culture. My family's case will expose the pure evil and utter corruption of the system itself. This is not a debate about the pros or cons of religion, quite the opposite. If you believe in God, you must find that God is very angry that we have rejected good science in order to fail one of the ten commandments: honoring parents. When we put "business" ahead of these sacred bonds, we have gone off track. When we fail the parent-child bond, when affection is outlawed, all physicality reduced to crass sexual terms, our society becomes untenable and we enter that ultimate catch-22 where sex education cannot occur, as it can be construed as "abuse" by unethical prosecutors. And the failure to educate our children drives them to become Abu Ghraib prison guards when they mature and must enter a sexually warped, militaristic and limited future.
Why were we blind to Abu Ghraib sex atrocities? Are we really that blind about how sexual repression affects our children? Why would we turn a blind eye to our own government's use of torture, when this has never been part of our understanding of "human rights" since Washington was president? Is our treatment of prisoners not more telling of our own cultural and ethical failures? When I say that the coming year in American politics will be the most corrupt in U.S. history, I am not merely being overtly political. I am suggesting that these dirty tricks will occur due to one of the most sexually repressed, sexually blind administrations in history as their final acting out event. These dirty tricks are now historical and actually predictable in sexually repressed, Republican administrations.
When children act out in ignorance, we are to educate them and not punish them. This education can be awkward and certainly not easy, but it is the duty of the parent to do so. Otherwise, this acting out process will continue well into adulthood. Perhaps that is why Dick Cheney should have been given timely sex education as a child instead of the full reigns of governmental power as a sexually repressed adult.
Given this current administration's obsession with secrecy, it is critical that we understand why our childrens' cases are held in the utmost secrecy. The need for absolute secrecy is one of the hallmarks of sexual repression for it consumates the unseemly marriage of fear and power. John F. Kennedy once said, "The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society; and we as people are inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings." But our children are being trafficked in total secrecy, through secret courts and secret, backroom proceedings due to the overwhelmingly criminal and unconstitutional practices of these state agencies. They must keep such criminality secret or risk an historic uprising by parents who must try to raise their children in this toxic, political environment.
Children go through critical stages of sexual learning that our culture simply ignores or reacts to hysterically. There is an entire industry dedicated to enforcing this societal negligence and hysteria. As these childrens' learning about sex become stunted or repressed, a host of maladies occurs including shame, social coldness and judgmental personalities, bigotry and a throng of other "demons." These demons are very real results of sexual repression in these children. The analogy of being "ice cold" is very true of sexually repressed individuals as well as entire communities. If you allow these people to win, you are inviting the iceman to take your kids. Our government actively promotes such coldness and these social maladies, as ironically, society will eventually punish these repressed children as adults. Why should a parent be forced to inflict this sexual repression and intellectual ignorance onto his children? Isn't such a parent negligent for keeping his child ignorant in a dangerous and confusing world? Nothing is more taboo than this subject precisely because nothing is more important to existing power systems. Sexual repression is fully institutionalized for a reason, as our childrens' education wrongfully neglects them in the most fundamentally important time of their development.
We are in the darkest days of sexual repression, as future generations will look on us as we look upon the Salem witch trials. But more importantly, these modern, barbaric programs that promote false orphans and child trafficking must and will be reversed. These programs amount to child theft by the most ignorant agents of government. Many of these programs are grossly libelous against those innocent parties who actually know that it's fundamentally wrong to raise children in ignorance. Who will take the lead?
If you already worry about the way your teenager can swing wildly from one viewpoint to another, you probably don't want to hear this.
“Kids can believe in abstinence, but also intend to have sex,” said N. Tatiana Masters, a social scientist at the University of Washington and author of a new study on teens' contradictory attitudes about abstinence and sex.
Story continues below ↓ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- advertisement
The research, published in the current issue of Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, shows that adolescents and teens often hold seemingly irreconcilable ideas about having sex, confounding the abstinence-only sex education message supported by over a billion dollars of federal funding.
The finding adds to a growing body of evidence eroding confidence in abstinence-only sex education.
Roughly $1.5 billion in federal grants to state education authorities have been distributed to finance abstinence-only curricula since the Clinton administration. But some states, like California, Wisconsin and Ohio, have stopped accepting the grants because the money is tied to a mandated abstinence-only message that studies have shown to be largely ineffective.
The problem with that message, Masters said, is not that adolescents ignore it. In her survey of 365 young people ages 12 to 15, she found that many had a positive view of abstinence, and those who did had less chance of having sex during the following 12 months.
But there was a catch. So-called “sex intention” powerfully modified “abstinence intention.”
In a range from 1 to 3, with 3 being the highest intention to abstain or to have sex, teens who scored very low on their sex intentions (1s) were not likely to have sex regardless of their abstinence intentions. But among teens with high scores (3s) on their sex intentions, those who also held the highest abstinence intentions were actually most likely to have sex.
"Increasing a kids' abstinence intentions has little impact on the bottom line," Masters said. But if a teen with a high sex intention obtains higher abstinence intentions, "he may become, we think, confused or conflicted and those heightened abstinence intentions may make him more likely to have sex in a kind of boomerang effect."
Masters isn't sure why this is, but speculates that the conflict might cause kids to feel out of control and less able to make rational decisions.
Three new papers have been published at 9-11 Research, an excellent site for credible, well-sourced 9/11 research and analysis. Posted below is a bit of introduction, but please follow the links to the full articles, with documentation, graphics, illustrations and reference footnotes.
April 3, 2009 911blogger.com From Dr. Steven Jones
A back-scattered electron (BSE) image featured in the newly published paper.
“Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe” by Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley and Bradley R. Larsen
The paper ends with this sentence: “Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.”
In short, the paper explodes the official story that “no evidence” exists for explosive/pyrotechnic materials in the WTC buildings.
What is high-tech explosive/pyrotechnic material in large quantities doing in the WTC dust? Who made tons of this stuff and why? Why have government investigators refused to look for explosive residues in the WTC aftermath?
These are central questions raised by this scientific study.
The peer-review on this paper was grueling, with pages of comments by referees. The tough questions the reviewers raised led to months of further experiments. These studies added much to the paper, including observation and photographs of iron-aluminum rich spheres produced as the material is ignited in a Differential Scanning Calorimeter (see Figures 20, 25 and 26).
The nine authors undertook an in-depth study of unusual red-gray chips found in the dust generated during the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001. The article states: “The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 ?C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.” The images and data plots deserve careful attention.
Some observations about the production of this paper:
1. First author is Professor Niels Harrit of Copenhagen University in Denmark, an Associate Professor of Chemistry. He is an expert in nano-chemistry; current research activities and his photo can be found here: http://cmm.nbi.ku.dk/ Molecular Structures on Short and Ultra Short Timescales A Centre under the Danish National Research Foundation
The Centre for Molecular Movies was inaugurated 29th November 2005, at the Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen. The Centre is made possible through a five year grant from the Danish National Research Foundation (see e.g. www.dg.dk). We aim to obtain real time “pictures” of how atoms are moving while processes are taking place in molecules and solid materials, using ultrashort pulses of laser light and X-rays. The goal is to understand and in turn influence, at the atomic level, the structural transformations associated with such processes.
The Centre combines expertise form Risø National Laboratory, University of Copenhagen, and the Technical University of Denmark in structural investigation of matter by synchrotron X-ray based techniques, femtosecond laser spectroscopy, theoretical insight in femtosecond processes, and the ability to tailor materials, and design sample systems for optimal experimental conditions.”
We understand that the Dean of Prof. Harrit’s college, Niels O Andersen, appears as the first name on the Editorial Advisory Board of the Bentham Science journal where the paper was published.
2. Second author is Dr. Jeffrey Farrer of BYU. http://www.physics.byu.edu/images/people/farrer.jpg
3. Dr. Farrer is featured in an article on page 11 of the BYU Frontiers magazine, Spring 2005: “Dr. Jeffrey Farrer, lab director for TEM” (TEM stands for Transmission Electron Microscopy). The article notes: “The electron microscopes in the TEM lab combine to give BYU capabilities that are virtually unique… rivaling anything built worldwide.” The article is entitled: “Rare and Powerful Microscopes Unlock Nano Secrets,” which is certainly true as regards the discoveries of the present paper.
4. Kudos to BYU for permitting Drs. Farrer and Jones and physics student Daniel Farnsworth to do the research described in the paper and for conducting internal reviews of the paper. Dr. Farrer was formerly first author on this paper. But after internal review of the paper, BYU administrators evidently disallowed him from being first author on ANY paper related to 9/11 research (this appears to be their perogative, but perhaps they will explain). Nevertheless, the paper was approved for publication with Dr. Farrer’s name and affiliation listed and we congratulate BYU for this. We stand by Dr. Farrer and congratulate his careful scientific research represented in this paper.
5. Perhaps now there will finally be a review of the SCIENCE explored by Profs. Harrit and Jones and by Drs. Farrer and Legge and their colleagues, as repeatedly requested by these scientists. We challenge ANY university or established laboratory group to perform such a review. This paper will be a good place to start, along with two other peer-reviewed papers in established journals involving several of the same authors:
Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction
Authors: Steven E. Jones, Frank M. Legge, Kevin R. Ryan, Anthony F. Szamboti, James R. Gourley. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, pp.35-40, Vol 2 http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ/2008/00000002/00000...
Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials Authors: Kevin R. Ryan, James R. Gourley, and Steven E. Jones The Environmentalist, August, 2008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10669-008-9182-4
6. James Hoffman has written three essays further explaining the implications and results of the paper. Thank you, Jim, for this work! http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/index.html
Now read the paper for yourself, and let your voice regarding these discoveries be heard!
http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/openaccess2.htm then click on “Active Thermitic Materials Discovered…”
Direct page link: (D/L PDF at source...) http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/000000...
Visibility 9-11 Welcomes Kevin Ryan and Dr. Steven E. Jones
These two important episodes of Visibility 9-11 welcomes back to the program, Kevin Ryan and Physicist Dr. Steven E. Jones.
Kevin is a chemist who is formerly of Underwriter Laboratories. Kevin became a 9-11 whistleblower when he was fired for writing his now infamous 2004 letter to Frank Gayle at the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST). Kevin has been very prolific in his research since getting fired by UL and has either authored or co-authored many important papers relating to 9-11 since 2004.
Dr. Jones is a retired physics professor and first emerged in late 2005 with his important paper, Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center Buildings Completely Collapse?, and has continued to do groundbreaking research into the "collapses" of all three high rise buildings on September 11th, 2001.
Kevin and Dr. Jones both sit as co-editors at the Journal of 9-11 Studies and Dr. Jones is the founder of Scholars for 9-11 Truth and Justice. Both have been stalwarts in the scientific and scholarly area of the 9-11 Truth Movement.
Our talks today with Kevin and Dr. Jones features an in-depth discussion on a new paper which has been formally published and peer reviewed by The Open Chemical Physics Journal titled Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe. In this revolutionary new research paper, discoveries made in the World Trade Center dust, particularly the red/gray bi-layered chips, are examined in great detail and include evidence of the thermite fingerprint at every juncture.
The research paper ends with this sentence, which pulls no punches when it comes to what the authors believe these red/gray chips to be:
"Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material."
Kevin Ryan, one of the co-authors of the research paper says,
"My colleagues and I have a new mainstream peer-reviewed paper published today, entitled "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust From the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe". Basically it shows that high tech explosive/pyrotechnic materials are scattered throughout the WTC dust. How can this be?"
Dr. Steven E. Jones another co-author of the paper writes:
"In short, the paper explodes the official story that “no evidence” exists for explosive/pyrotechnic materials in the WTC buildings." The red/gray chips are the "loaded gun" of 9-11.
Download these important episodes of Visibility 9-11 and here and here.
Find links to the research paper, these episodes, and watch for other planned interviews on this topic at our Visibility 9-11 Special Report, The Thermite Fingerprint; The Loaded Gun.
Robert Lukehart in coordination with Steven Jones published the latest disclosures.
Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime April 3, 2009
In what should send a frightening chill down the spine of every blogger, writer, journalist and First Amendment advocate in the United States, Phoenix police raided the home of a blogger who has been highly critical of the department.
Jeff Pataky, who runs Bad Phoenix Cops, said the officers confiscated three computers, routers, modems, hard drives, memory cards and everything necessary to continue blogging.
The 41-year-old software engineer said they also confiscated numerous personal files and documents relating to a pending lawsuit he has against the department alleging harassment - which he says makes it obvious the raid was an act of retaliation.
Maricopa County Judge Gary Donahoe signed the search warrant that allowed at least ten cops to raid his home in North Phoenix on March 12 while handcuffing his female roommate for three hours as they tore the place apart.
Pataky, who was out of town on a business trip during the raid, also believes police were retaliating against him for the content of his blog, much of it which comes from inside sources within the department.
“They broke into my safe and took the backups of my backups,” he said in a phone interview with Photography is Not a Crime on Wednesday.
“I can’t even file my taxes because all my business plans are gone. They took everything.”
The search warrant lists “petty theft” and “computer tampering with the intent to harass” as probable causes. He has yet to see an actual affidavit that lists in detail the probable cause and is skeptical that one even exists.
“They say everything has been sealed,” he said.
The conflict between Pataky and the Phoenix Police Department began two years ago during “a nasty divorce” after moving out of the house he had shared with his wife. His said she was not taking the divorce too well and began filing false allegations against him accusing him of stalking and harassing her.
Many of the reports she filed accused him of doing things when he was out of town, he said.
So he began filing complaints with everybody from Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon down to Phoenix Police Chief Jack Harris to no avail. He was eventually indicted for harassing his ex-wife.
A month before the trial, he and a few friends launched the website as a rant against the police department. When he went to trial in May 2008, his charges were immediately dismissed because of lack of evidence, he said.
“We were going to shut down the website after that but then all of a sudden all these good cops started hitting the site and sending us tips,” he said.
He said they would also deliver all kinds of internal documents from within the department exposing everything from a cop with multiple DUIs to another cop whose son was a child molester and was trying to get on the force (and was eventually arrested).
“We have about 50 to 100 retired and active cops who provide us information,” he said.
Police apparently believe one of the tipsters is an officer named David Barnes, who fell out of favor with the department in 2007 when he was a detective and went public with claims of mismanaged evidence at the city crime lab.
Police also raided Barnes’ home and according to Pataky’s inside sources, plan to raid the homes of more cops.
Police have been extremely vague about the nature of the raids, according to the arizona republic.
Police officials said Wednesday that a Phoenix detective prompted the investigation after complaining about harassment, though they declined further comment…
Phoenix Assistant Chief Andy Anderson said the harassment case is unique because of the connection to an unaccredited grassroots Web site. He said the blog is one part of the case, though he did not provide specifics of the ongoing investigation.
“This isn’t about the blog,” Anderson said. “That’s just where the investigation led.”
The allegation of “petty theft” against Pataky stem from photos he posted on his blog of police name plates that appear to have been taken from within the department. He said he actually made the plates himself.
The allegation of “computer tampering with the intent to harass” obviously has to do with his no holds barred criticism of the department.
Pataky, who has since purchased a new laptop, is taking the raid in stride and has added it to the allegations in his pending lawsuit.
And he has not let it stop him from blogging.
“They thought they were going to scare us into a corner but they just made us stronger.”
Both the government and the mainstream media have since tried to portray the 9/11 truth movement as led by people who can be dismissed as 'conspiracy theorists' able to find an outlet for their ideas only on the Internet. Books now available, with essays by intellectuals from Europe and North America, show this caricature to be untrue. Coming from different intellectual disciplines as well as from different parts of the world, these authors are united in the conviction that the official story about 9/11 is a huge deception manufactured to extend imperial control at home and abroad. See the PeaceProject.com Website for top publications.
Mind Control has been developed as the fourth branch of government, as child abduction, brainwashing and trafficking is a major underground industry in America. President Eisenhower tried to warn us about this "spiritual attack" in 1959. Now as a federal whistleblower, I expose Nazi Mind Control in America and how it works. I graduated with the "elite" mind programmers at Harvard. Nazification programs developed by the CIA are now used by Child Services. Children touched by "Child Services" grow into darkness. American youth are alienated, radicalized and disillusioned for good reason. I expose some of our government's most secret and horrific crimes against children. For this, my dear family was stolen, brainwashed and lost in a web of government fraud and corruption. Keeping children ignorant about sex, drugs and usury make them highly vulnerable to Government and Corporate Mind Control. We petition the Supreme Court and Congress to prepare Articles of Treason against our real enemies. For my dear daughter and family, I am always fighting for you!
